Factors that Influence Healthcare Professionals' Intentions towards Biosimilars.

Innovations in pharmacy Pub Date : 2024-03-18 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.24926/iip.v15i1.5922
Mohammed Al Qahtani, Ahmed Al-Jedai, Albert Wertheimer
{"title":"Factors that Influence Healthcare Professionals' Intentions towards Biosimilars.","authors":"Mohammed Al Qahtani, Ahmed Al-Jedai, Albert Wertheimer","doi":"10.24926/iip.v15i1.5922","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><i>Background</i>: Physicians often prescribe original biologic products to patients who have not used them before and are reluctant to switch to biosimilars. Biosimilars are highly similar versions of already-approved biologics, but healthcare professionals typically hesitate to transition patients from the original products to biosimilars. This study aims to investigate the factors that influence U.S. healthcare professionals' intentions to use biosimilars. <i>Methods</i>: A cross-sectional study was conducted. 510 participants were eligible healthcare professionals (279 physicians and 231 pharmacists). The theory of planned behavior (TPB) is used to identify which factors affect healthcare professionals' intentions. Descriptive statistics, chi-square, and the logistic regression model tested the TPB constructs as predictors of intentions toward biosimilars. <i>Results</i>: Among 279 physicians, most were aged 61 and above, with high (n = 142) and low (n = 137) intentions. Male physicians constituted 71% of the population. Attending physicians (66.3%) showed consistent perceptions towards biosimilars, primarily in the private sector (76.3%). Pharmacists (n = 231), a higher percentage of females demonstrated higher intentions compared to males (35.5% vs. 28.1%); the majority were community pharmacists. Associations between years of practice and intentions were significant. Positive correlations existed between beliefs and intentions, except for normative beliefs. <i>Conclusions</i>: This study revealed diverse attitudes among healthcare professionals towards biosimilars in the USA. Pharmacists and physicians, especially those with limited experience, require ongoing education on biosimilar manufacturing pathways. This education supports the appropriate use of biosimilars and helps standardize federal and state legislation.</p>","PeriodicalId":501014,"journal":{"name":"Innovations in pharmacy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11107969/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Innovations in pharmacy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24926/iip.v15i1.5922","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Physicians often prescribe original biologic products to patients who have not used them before and are reluctant to switch to biosimilars. Biosimilars are highly similar versions of already-approved biologics, but healthcare professionals typically hesitate to transition patients from the original products to biosimilars. This study aims to investigate the factors that influence U.S. healthcare professionals' intentions to use biosimilars. Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted. 510 participants were eligible healthcare professionals (279 physicians and 231 pharmacists). The theory of planned behavior (TPB) is used to identify which factors affect healthcare professionals' intentions. Descriptive statistics, chi-square, and the logistic regression model tested the TPB constructs as predictors of intentions toward biosimilars. Results: Among 279 physicians, most were aged 61 and above, with high (n = 142) and low (n = 137) intentions. Male physicians constituted 71% of the population. Attending physicians (66.3%) showed consistent perceptions towards biosimilars, primarily in the private sector (76.3%). Pharmacists (n = 231), a higher percentage of females demonstrated higher intentions compared to males (35.5% vs. 28.1%); the majority were community pharmacists. Associations between years of practice and intentions were significant. Positive correlations existed between beliefs and intentions, except for normative beliefs. Conclusions: This study revealed diverse attitudes among healthcare professionals towards biosimilars in the USA. Pharmacists and physicians, especially those with limited experience, require ongoing education on biosimilar manufacturing pathways. This education supports the appropriate use of biosimilars and helps standardize federal and state legislation.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
影响医疗保健专业人员对生物仿制药意向的因素。
背景:医生通常会给从未使用过原研生物制剂产品的患者开处方,而患者又不愿意改用生物仿制药。生物仿制药是已获批准的生物制剂的高度相似版本,但医疗保健专业人员在将患者从原研产品转为生物仿制药时通常会犹豫不决。本研究旨在调查影响美国医疗保健专业人员使用生物仿制药意愿的因素。研究方法进行了一项横断面研究。510 名参与者均为符合条件的医疗保健专业人士(279 名医生和 231 名药剂师)。采用计划行为理论(TPB)来确定哪些因素会影响医疗保健专业人员的意向。描述性统计、卡方差和逻辑回归模型检验了作为生物仿制药意向预测因素的 TPB 构建。结果显示在 279 名医生中,大多数年龄在 61 岁及以上,有高意向(142 人)和低意向(137 人)。男性医生占总人数的 71%。主治医生(66.3%)对生物仿制药的看法一致,主要是在私营部门(76.3%)。药剂师(n = 231)中,女性的意愿高于男性(35.5% 对 28.1%);大多数药剂师是社区药剂师。执业年限与意愿之间存在显著关联。除规范性信念外,其他信念与意愿之间存在正相关。结论这项研究揭示了美国医疗保健专业人员对生物仿制药的不同态度。药剂师和医生,尤其是经验有限的药剂师和医生,需要不断接受有关生物仿制药生产途径的教育。这种教育有助于合理使用生物仿制药,并有助于规范联邦和各州的立法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Modifying Pharmacy Enrollments by Employment Realities. Pharmacy Interns' Perception of Climate Change and Its Impact on Health. Somatization in Polypharmacy: Hiding in Plain Sight. The Risk of Venous Thromboembolism Events Resulting in Hospitalization following Exposure to Antipsychotic Medication in Pre-Disposed Adult Patients. Using a Preceptor Development Series in Writing and Publication to Improve Residency Research Manuscripts.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1