Crowdsourcing the Impact of Illustration in Cleft Surgery Education.

IF 1.1 4区 医学 Q2 Dentistry Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Journal Pub Date : 2024-05-22 DOI:10.1177/10556656241257101
Meagan Wu, Elizabeth B Card, Jonathan H Sussman, Dillan F Villavisanis, Benjamin B Massenburg, Jinggang J Ng, Dominic J Romeo, Jordan W Swanson, Jesse A Taylor, David W Low
{"title":"Crowdsourcing the Impact of Illustration in Cleft Surgery Education.","authors":"Meagan Wu, Elizabeth B Card, Jonathan H Sussman, Dillan F Villavisanis, Benjamin B Massenburg, Jinggang J Ng, Dominic J Romeo, Jordan W Swanson, Jesse A Taylor, David W Low","doi":"10.1177/10556656241257101","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aimed to (1) assess layperson preferences for how surgical information is presented; (2) evaluate how the format of visual information relates to layperson comfort with undergoing surgery, perceptions of surgeon character traits, and beliefs about artistic skill impacting plastic surgery practice; and (3) identify sociodemographic characteristics associated with these outcomes.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>A survey was developed in which one of five standardized sets of information depicting a unilateral cleft lip repair was presented as (1) text alone, (2) quick sketches, (3) simple drawings, (4) detailed illustrations, or (5) photographs.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Online crowdsourcing platform.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>Raters aged 18 years and older from the United States.</p><p><strong>Interventions: </strong>None.</p><p><strong>Main outcome measure(s): </strong>After viewing the surgical information, participants answered three sets of Likert scale questions. Ratings were averaged to produce three composite scores assessing (1) comfort with undergoing surgery (2) perceptions of surgeon character traits, and (3) beliefs about plastic surgery and artistry.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Four hundred seventy-nine participants were included. Surgeon character traits score was highest among participants who viewed detailed illustrations at 4.46 ± 0.59, followed by photographs at 4.43 ± 0.54, text alone at 4.28 ± 0.59, simple drawings at 4.17 ± 0.67, and quick sketches at 4.17 ± 0.71 (<i>p </i>= 0.0014). Participants who viewed detailed illustrations rated surgical comfort score and plastic surgery and artistry score highest, although differences did not achieve statistical significance.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Viewing detailed cleft lip repair illustrations was significantly associated with positive perceptions of surgeon character traits. Our data help to contextualize methods of communication and education valued by the public when seeking cleft care.</p>","PeriodicalId":49220,"journal":{"name":"Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10556656241257101","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Dentistry","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: This study aimed to (1) assess layperson preferences for how surgical information is presented; (2) evaluate how the format of visual information relates to layperson comfort with undergoing surgery, perceptions of surgeon character traits, and beliefs about artistic skill impacting plastic surgery practice; and (3) identify sociodemographic characteristics associated with these outcomes.

Design: A survey was developed in which one of five standardized sets of information depicting a unilateral cleft lip repair was presented as (1) text alone, (2) quick sketches, (3) simple drawings, (4) detailed illustrations, or (5) photographs.

Setting: Online crowdsourcing platform.

Participants: Raters aged 18 years and older from the United States.

Interventions: None.

Main outcome measure(s): After viewing the surgical information, participants answered three sets of Likert scale questions. Ratings were averaged to produce three composite scores assessing (1) comfort with undergoing surgery (2) perceptions of surgeon character traits, and (3) beliefs about plastic surgery and artistry.

Results: Four hundred seventy-nine participants were included. Surgeon character traits score was highest among participants who viewed detailed illustrations at 4.46 ± 0.59, followed by photographs at 4.43 ± 0.54, text alone at 4.28 ± 0.59, simple drawings at 4.17 ± 0.67, and quick sketches at 4.17 ± 0.71 (p = 0.0014). Participants who viewed detailed illustrations rated surgical comfort score and plastic surgery and artistry score highest, although differences did not achieve statistical significance.

Conclusions: Viewing detailed cleft lip repair illustrations was significantly associated with positive perceptions of surgeon character traits. Our data help to contextualize methods of communication and education valued by the public when seeking cleft care.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
众包插图在裂隙手术教育中的影响。
研究目的本研究旨在:(1) 评估非专业人士对手术信息呈现方式的偏好;(2) 评估视觉信息的形式与非专业人士接受手术的舒适度、对外科医生性格特征的看法以及对影响整形外科实践的艺术技能的信念之间的关系;(3) 确定与这些结果相关的社会人口特征:设计:设计了一项调查,在五套描述单侧唇裂修复的标准化信息中,以(1)纯文字、(2)快速草图、(3)简笔画、(4)详细插图或(5)照片的形式呈现:在线众包平台:干预措施:无:主要结果测量观看手术信息后,参与者回答三组李克特量表问题。评分取平均值,得出三个综合分数,分别评估(1)接受手术的舒适度(2)对外科医生性格特征的看法,以及(3)对整形手术和艺术性的信念:结果:共纳入 479 名参与者。外科医生性格特征得分在观看详细插图的参与者中最高,为(4.46 ± 0.59)分,其次是照片(4.43 ± 0.54)分、纯文字(4.28 ± 0.59)分、简笔画(4.17 ± 0.67)分和速写(4.17 ± 0.71)分(p = 0.0014)。观看详细插图的参与者对手术舒适度评分和整形外科及艺术性评分最高,但差异未达到统计学意义:结论:观看详细的唇裂修复插图与对外科医生性格特征的积极看法有显著相关性。我们的数据有助于了解公众在寻求唇裂治疗时所重视的沟通和教育方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Journal
Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Journal DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE-SURGERY
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
36.40%
发文量
0
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Journal (CPCJ) is the premiere peer-reviewed, interdisciplinary, international journal dedicated to current research on etiology, prevention, diagnosis, and treatment in all areas pertaining to craniofacial anomalies. CPCJ reports on basic science and clinical research aimed at better elucidating the pathogenesis, pathology, and optimal methods of treatment of cleft and craniofacial anomalies. The journal strives to foster communication and cooperation among professionals from all specialties.
期刊最新文献
Standardization of Videorecorded Speech Samples for Children with Cleft Palate: Methods to Facilitate High-Quality Speech Outcomes Data Collection. Influence of Cleft Lip and Palate on Children's Recorder, Flute, and Clarinet Performance. Bridging Gaps in Health Literacy for Cleft Lip and Palate: Correspondence. Imaging Yield and Surgical Outcomes of Nasal, Medial Brow, Forehead, and Scalp Dermoid Cysts. Patient-Reported Esthetic Outcomes Following Secondary Rhinoplasty in Adult Patients with a Cleft lip and Palate.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1