Neonatal morbidity and mortality in birth centers in the United States 2018–2021: An observational study of low-risk birthing individuals

IF 2.8 3区 医学 Q1 NURSING Birth-Issues in Perinatal Care Pub Date : 2024-05-23 DOI:10.1111/birt.12823
Lauren Hoehn-Velasco PhD, Lisa Ross DNP, R. David Phillippi PhD, Nancy A. Niemczyk PhD, Dominic Cammarano DO, Steven Calvin MD, Julia C. Phillippi PhD, Jill Alliman DNP, Susan Rutledge Stapleton DNP, Jennifer Wright MA, Stanley Fisch MD, Diana Jolles PhD
{"title":"Neonatal morbidity and mortality in birth centers in the United States 2018–2021: An observational study of low-risk birthing individuals","authors":"Lauren Hoehn-Velasco PhD,&nbsp;Lisa Ross DNP,&nbsp;R. David Phillippi PhD,&nbsp;Nancy A. Niemczyk PhD,&nbsp;Dominic Cammarano DO,&nbsp;Steven Calvin MD,&nbsp;Julia C. Phillippi PhD,&nbsp;Jill Alliman DNP,&nbsp;Susan Rutledge Stapleton DNP,&nbsp;Jennifer Wright MA,&nbsp;Stanley Fisch MD,&nbsp;Diana Jolles PhD","doi":"10.1111/birt.12823","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>Many studies reporting neonatal outcomes in birth centers include births with risk factors not acceptable for birth center care using the evidence-based CABC criteria. Accurate comparisons of outcomes by birth setting for low-risk patients are needed.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>Data from the public Natality Detailed File from 2018 to 2021 were used. Logistic regression, including adjusted and unadjusted odds ratios, compared neonatal outcomes (chorioamnionitis, Apgar scores, resuscitation, intensive care, seizures, and death) between centers and hospitals. Covariates included maternal diabetes, body mass index, age, parity, and demographic characteristics.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>The sample included 8,738,711 births (8,698,432 (99.53%) in hospitals and 40,279 (0.46%) in birth centers). There were no significant differences in neonatal deaths (aOR 1.037; 95% CI [0.515, 2.088]; <i>p</i>-value 0.918) or seizures (aOR 0.666; 95% CI [0.315, 1.411]; <i>p</i>-value 0.289). Measures of morbidity either not significantly different or less likely to occur in birth centers compared to hospitals included chorioamnionitis (aOR 0.032; 95% CI [0.020, 0.052]; <i>p</i>-value &lt; 0.001), Apgar score &lt; 4 (aOR 0.814, 95% CI [0.638, 1.039], <i>p</i>-value 0.099), Apgar score &lt; 7 (aOR 1.075, 95% CI [0.979, 1.180], <i>p</i>-value 0.130), ventilation &gt;6 h (aOR 0.349; [0.281,0.433], <i>p</i>-value &lt; 0.001), and intensive care admission (aOR 0.356; 95% CI [0.328, 0.386], <i>p</i>-value &lt; 0.001). Birth centers had higher odds of assisted neonatal ventilation for &lt;6 h as compared to hospitals (aOR 1.373; 95% CI [1.293, 1.457], <i>p</i>-value &lt; 0.001).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>Neonatal deaths and seizures were not significantly different between freestanding birth centers and hospitals. Chorioamnionitis, Apgar scores &lt; 4, and intensive care admission were less likely to occur in birth centers.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":55350,"journal":{"name":"Birth-Issues in Perinatal Care","volume":"51 3","pages":"659-666"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/birt.12823","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Birth-Issues in Perinatal Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/birt.12823","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Many studies reporting neonatal outcomes in birth centers include births with risk factors not acceptable for birth center care using the evidence-based CABC criteria. Accurate comparisons of outcomes by birth setting for low-risk patients are needed.

Methods

Data from the public Natality Detailed File from 2018 to 2021 were used. Logistic regression, including adjusted and unadjusted odds ratios, compared neonatal outcomes (chorioamnionitis, Apgar scores, resuscitation, intensive care, seizures, and death) between centers and hospitals. Covariates included maternal diabetes, body mass index, age, parity, and demographic characteristics.

Results

The sample included 8,738,711 births (8,698,432 (99.53%) in hospitals and 40,279 (0.46%) in birth centers). There were no significant differences in neonatal deaths (aOR 1.037; 95% CI [0.515, 2.088]; p-value 0.918) or seizures (aOR 0.666; 95% CI [0.315, 1.411]; p-value 0.289). Measures of morbidity either not significantly different or less likely to occur in birth centers compared to hospitals included chorioamnionitis (aOR 0.032; 95% CI [0.020, 0.052]; p-value < 0.001), Apgar score < 4 (aOR 0.814, 95% CI [0.638, 1.039], p-value 0.099), Apgar score < 7 (aOR 1.075, 95% CI [0.979, 1.180], p-value 0.130), ventilation >6 h (aOR 0.349; [0.281,0.433], p-value < 0.001), and intensive care admission (aOR 0.356; 95% CI [0.328, 0.386], p-value < 0.001). Birth centers had higher odds of assisted neonatal ventilation for <6 h as compared to hospitals (aOR 1.373; 95% CI [1.293, 1.457], p-value < 0.001).

Conclusion

Neonatal deaths and seizures were not significantly different between freestanding birth centers and hospitals. Chorioamnionitis, Apgar scores < 4, and intensive care admission were less likely to occur in birth centers.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
2018-2021 年美国分娩中心的新生儿发病率和死亡率:对低风险分娩者的观察研究。
背景:许多报道分娩中心新生儿预后的研究都包括了一些具有风险因素的新生儿,这些风险因素根据循证 CABC 标准不属于分娩中心护理的范围。需要对低风险患者在不同出生环境下的预后进行准确比较:方法:使用来自 2018 年至 2021 年公共出生详细档案的数据。逻辑回归(包括调整和未调整的几率比)比较了不同中心和医院的新生儿结局(绒毛膜羊膜炎、Apgar评分、复苏、重症监护、癫痫发作和死亡)。协变量包括产妇糖尿病、体重指数、年龄、胎次和人口统计学特征:样本包括 8,738,711 例新生儿(8,698,432 例(99.53%)在医院出生,40,279 例(0.46%)在分娩中心出生)。新生儿死亡(aOR 1.037;95% CI [0.515,2.088];p 值 0.918)或惊厥(aOR 0.666;95% CI [0.315,1.411];p 值 0.289)没有明显差异。与医院相比,分娩中心的发病率无明显差异或较低,包括绒毛膜羊膜炎(aOR 0.032;95% CI [0.020,0.052];p-value 6 h(aOR 0.349;[0.281,0.433],p-value 结论:独立接生中心和医院的新生儿死亡和癫痫发作没有明显差异。绒毛膜羊膜炎,阿普加评分
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Birth-Issues in Perinatal Care
Birth-Issues in Perinatal Care 医学-妇产科学
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
4.00%
发文量
90
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Birth: Issues in Perinatal Care is a multidisciplinary, refereed journal devoted to issues and practices in the care of childbearing women, infants, and families. It is written by and for professionals in maternal and neonatal health, nurses, midwives, physicians, public health workers, doulas, social scientists, childbirth educators, lactation counselors, epidemiologists, and other health caregivers and policymakers in perinatal care.
期刊最新文献
Issue Information A History of Cesarean Birth as a Risk Factor for Postpartum Hemorrhage Even After Successful Planned Vaginal Birth. Pregnant Women's Care Needs During Early Labor-A Scoping Review. Sociodemographic and Health-Related Risk Factors Associated With Planned and Emergency Cesarean Births in Mexico. Validating the Quality Maternal and Newborn Care Framework Index: A Global Tool for Quality-of-Care Evaluations.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1