Update of the competence-based catalog of learning objectives in nuclear medicine for the study of human medicine in Germany.

Nuklearmedizin. Nuclear medicine Pub Date : 2024-10-01 Epub Date: 2024-05-22 DOI:10.1055/a-2319-7549
Stefanie Heidemanns, Stephanie Trautmann, Daniela Weidt, Dirk Hellwig
{"title":"Update of the competence-based catalog of learning objectives in nuclear medicine for the study of human medicine in Germany.","authors":"Stefanie Heidemanns, Stephanie Trautmann, Daniela Weidt, Dirk Hellwig","doi":"10.1055/a-2319-7549","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>To update the subject-specific, competence-based catalog of learning objectives for medical studies in Germany published by the German Society of Nuclear Medicine (DGN) in 2018, prioritizing relevant learning objectives.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Based on the previous catalog, the writing group compiled nuclear medicine topics and formulated competence-based learning objectives, including medical developments, device innovations and new radiopharmaceutical approvals. These were presented for prioritization to the 180 habilitated DGN members as an expert group in a Delphi process. The first round of voting assessed firstly the topics in terms of necessity or dispensability, and secondly the detailed learning objectives of the topics were assessed for their relevance to academic teaching in nuclear medicine. The results of the first survey were used to draft a catalog of learning objectives with final approval by the expert group in a second survey. The time available for teaching nuclear medicine was also recorded.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The writing group developed 240 competence-based learning objectives from 41 topics. After a first Delphi round, 73 detailed competence-based learning objectives from 15 topics were compiled. The mean teaching time was 8.4 h for lectures, 3.7 h for seminars and 3.6 h for practical courses. In a second Delphi round, the agreement of the expert group was at least 95% for the selected topics and at least 90% for the detailed learning objectives.</p><p><strong>Summary: </strong>The catalog of subject-specific learning objectives, updated by expert consensus, provides basic knowledge, skills and competences related to the most relevant diagnostic and therapeutic procedures in nuclear medicine, taking into account both long-established topics and recently introduced innovations.</p>","PeriodicalId":94161,"journal":{"name":"Nuklearmedizin. Nuclear medicine","volume":" ","pages":"311-317"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nuklearmedizin. Nuclear medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2319-7549","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/5/22 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aim: To update the subject-specific, competence-based catalog of learning objectives for medical studies in Germany published by the German Society of Nuclear Medicine (DGN) in 2018, prioritizing relevant learning objectives.

Methods: Based on the previous catalog, the writing group compiled nuclear medicine topics and formulated competence-based learning objectives, including medical developments, device innovations and new radiopharmaceutical approvals. These were presented for prioritization to the 180 habilitated DGN members as an expert group in a Delphi process. The first round of voting assessed firstly the topics in terms of necessity or dispensability, and secondly the detailed learning objectives of the topics were assessed for their relevance to academic teaching in nuclear medicine. The results of the first survey were used to draft a catalog of learning objectives with final approval by the expert group in a second survey. The time available for teaching nuclear medicine was also recorded.

Results: The writing group developed 240 competence-based learning objectives from 41 topics. After a first Delphi round, 73 detailed competence-based learning objectives from 15 topics were compiled. The mean teaching time was 8.4 h for lectures, 3.7 h for seminars and 3.6 h for practical courses. In a second Delphi round, the agreement of the expert group was at least 95% for the selected topics and at least 90% for the detailed learning objectives.

Summary: The catalog of subject-specific learning objectives, updated by expert consensus, provides basic knowledge, skills and competences related to the most relevant diagnostic and therapeutic procedures in nuclear medicine, taking into account both long-established topics and recently introduced innovations.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
更新以能力为基础的德国人类医学核医学学习目标目录。
目的:更新德国核医学会(DGN)2018年发布的德国医学研究学习目标的特定主题、基于能力的目录,优先考虑相关的学习目标.方法:更新德国核医学会(DGN)2018年发布的德国医学研究学习目标的特定主题、基于能力的目录:方法:编写小组在先前目录的基础上,汇编了核医学主题,并制定了基于能力的学习目标,包括医学发展、设备创新和新放射性药物批准。这些目标以德尔菲法的形式提交给 180 名经过培训的 DGN 成员作为专家组,以确定优先次序。第一轮投票首先从必要性或可有可无的角度对专题进行评估,其次评估专题的详细学习目标与核医学学术教学的相关性。第一次调查的结果被用于起草学习目标目录,并由专家组在第二次调查中最终批准。此外,还记录了可用于核医学教学的时间:结果:编写小组从 41 个主题中制定了 240 个基于能力的学习目标。结果:编写小组从 41 个专题中制定了 240 个以能力为基础的学习目标,经过第一轮德尔菲法,从 15 个专题中汇编了 73 个详细的以能力为基础的学习目标。讲课的平均教学时间为 8.4 小时,研讨会为 3.7 小时,实践课程为 3.6 小时。在第二轮德尔菲讨论中,专家组对所选主题的同意率至少达到 95%,对详细学习目标的同意率至少达到 90%。总结:经专家共识更新的特定主题学习目标目录提供了与核医学最相关的诊断和治疗程序有关的基本知识、技能和能力,同时考虑到了历史悠久的主题和最近引入的创新。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
A Case of Thoracic SMARCA4-Deficient Undifferentiated Tumor on 18F-FDG PET/CT. Different molecular imaging methods for localization and diagnosis of a mesenchymal tumor causing osteomalacia. Comparison of whole-body 18F-FDG-PET/CT with 18F-FDG-PET/CT limited to skull base to upper abdomen for primary staging of lung cancer - a retrospective explorative analysis. Superimposing kidneys in [99mTc]MAG-3 and [99mTc]DMSA-scintigraphy in a tricky case of an extensive, displacing growing retroperitoneal liposarcoma. Peculiar Pattern of Response Following [225Ac]Ac-PSMA Therapy: A Case Report with 'PSA Pseudoregression' Response Pattern.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1