“My attending really wants it!” Manual clinical decision support adjudicating the “better look” inpatient MRI at an academic medical center

IF 1.5 Q3 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING Current Problems in Diagnostic Radiology Pub Date : 2024-05-22 DOI:10.1067/j.cpradiol.2024.05.016
{"title":"“My attending really wants it!” Manual clinical decision support adjudicating the “better look” inpatient MRI at an academic medical center","authors":"","doi":"10.1067/j.cpradiol.2024.05.016","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>MRI utilization in the United States is relatively higher than in other parts of the world and inpatient MRI utilization is particularly difficult to manage given the lack of direct reimbursement. Body MRI studies present an opportunity to reduce inpatient MRI utilization since they are generally the least emergent. Our objective was to use a targeted questionnaire to probe the necessity of inpatient body MRI orders and present an opportunity to either cancel them or transition them to the outpatient realm</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>A 9-item questionnaire was devised asking questions about the urgency of the inpatient MRI order including the urgent management question, an inpatient procedure or whether it was recommended by a consultant. Peer-to-peer discussion walking through each of the questions was conducted by radiology housestaff with the ordering clinicians and responses recorded.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>845 recorded responses reported a lack of specific clinical question in 23.9% of orders, 68.9% were recommended by a non-radiology consulting service and 16.1% were recommended by radiology studies. 17.0% orders were felt to be outpatient appropriate and 23.3% were considered possibly appropriate for the outpatient setting. 3.9% were canceled and 4.9% were transitioned to outpatient orders.</p></div><div><h3>Discussion</h3><p>Engaging in a focused discussion about the urgency and appropriateness of an inpatient MRI body order following a list of scripted questions has the potential to reduce utilization. This approach also highlights the relatively high rate of indication uncertainty among ordering clinicians and the central role of consultants in prompting orders.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":51617,"journal":{"name":"Current Problems in Diagnostic Radiology","volume":"53 5","pages":"Pages 583-587"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Problems in Diagnostic Radiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0363018824000914","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

MRI utilization in the United States is relatively higher than in other parts of the world and inpatient MRI utilization is particularly difficult to manage given the lack of direct reimbursement. Body MRI studies present an opportunity to reduce inpatient MRI utilization since they are generally the least emergent. Our objective was to use a targeted questionnaire to probe the necessity of inpatient body MRI orders and present an opportunity to either cancel them or transition them to the outpatient realm

Methods

A 9-item questionnaire was devised asking questions about the urgency of the inpatient MRI order including the urgent management question, an inpatient procedure or whether it was recommended by a consultant. Peer-to-peer discussion walking through each of the questions was conducted by radiology housestaff with the ordering clinicians and responses recorded.

Results

845 recorded responses reported a lack of specific clinical question in 23.9% of orders, 68.9% were recommended by a non-radiology consulting service and 16.1% were recommended by radiology studies. 17.0% orders were felt to be outpatient appropriate and 23.3% were considered possibly appropriate for the outpatient setting. 3.9% were canceled and 4.9% were transitioned to outpatient orders.

Discussion

Engaging in a focused discussion about the urgency and appropriateness of an inpatient MRI body order following a list of scripted questions has the potential to reduce utilization. This approach also highlights the relatively high rate of indication uncertainty among ordering clinicians and the central role of consultants in prompting orders.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
"我的主治医生真的想要!"在一家学术医疗中心,手动临床决策支持对 "更好看 "的住院磁共振成像进行裁决。
目的:美国的核磁共振成像使用率相对高于世界其他地区,由于缺乏直接报销,住院病人的核磁共振成像使用率尤其难以管理。身体核磁共振成像检查是减少住院患者使用核磁共振成像的一个机会,因为这些检查通常最不紧急。我们的目标是使用有针对性的问卷调查来探究住院病人身体核磁共振成像订单的必要性,并提供机会取消这些订单或将其转至门诊领域 方法:我们设计了一份包含 9 个项目的问卷,询问住院病人核磁共振成像订单的紧迫性,包括紧急管理问题、住院手术或是否由顾问推荐。放射科工作人员与下医嘱的临床医生就每个问题进行了点对点讨论,并记录了回答情况:845份记录的答复显示,23.9%的医嘱缺乏具体的临床问题,68.9%的医嘱由非放射科咨询服务推荐,16.1%的医嘱由放射科研究推荐。17.0%的医嘱被认为适合门诊使用,23.3%被认为可能适合门诊使用。3.9%的医嘱被取消,4.9%的医嘱转为门诊医嘱:讨论:根据脚本问题清单就住院患者核磁共振成像体检查单的紧迫性和适当性进行集中讨论,有可能减少使用率。这种方法还凸显了下医嘱的临床医生中存在相对较高的适应症不确定性以及顾问在促使下医嘱方面的核心作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Current Problems in Diagnostic Radiology
Current Problems in Diagnostic Radiology RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING-
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
113
审稿时长
46 days
期刊介绍: Current Problems in Diagnostic Radiology covers important and controversial topics in radiology. Each issue presents important viewpoints from leading radiologists. High-quality reproductions of radiographs, CT scans, MR images, and sonograms clearly depict what is being described in each article. Also included are valuable updates relevant to other areas of practice, such as medical-legal issues or archiving systems. With new multi-topic format and image-intensive style, Current Problems in Diagnostic Radiology offers an outstanding, time-saving investigation into current topics most relevant to radiologists.
期刊最新文献
Editorial Board Table of Contents Gender equality in radiology: 3 steps worth taking Breast Imaging: what women & healthcare professionals need to know #HeForShe in radiology: A toolkit for radiologists
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1