A Nordic survey on artificial intelligence in the radiography profession – Is the profession ready for a culture change?

IF 2.5 Q2 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING Radiography Pub Date : 2024-05-22 DOI:10.1016/j.radi.2024.04.020
M.R.V. Pedersen , M.W. Kusk , S. Lysdahlgaard , H. Mork-Knudsen , C. Malamateniou , J. Jensen
{"title":"A Nordic survey on artificial intelligence in the radiography profession – Is the profession ready for a culture change?","authors":"M.R.V. Pedersen ,&nbsp;M.W. Kusk ,&nbsp;S. Lysdahlgaard ,&nbsp;H. Mork-Knudsen ,&nbsp;C. Malamateniou ,&nbsp;J. Jensen","doi":"10.1016/j.radi.2024.04.020","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>The impact of artificial intelligence (AI) on the radiography profession remains uncertain. Although AI has been increasingly used in clinical radiography, the perspectives of the radiography professionals in Nordic countries have yet to be examined. The primary aim was to examine views of Nordic radiographers ‘on AI, with focus on perspectives, engagement, and knowledge of AI.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Radiographers from Denmark, Norway, Sweden, Iceland, Greenland, and the Faroe Island were invited through social media platforms to participate in an online survey from March to June 2023. The survey encompassed 29-items and included 4 sections a) demographics, b) barriers and enablers on AI, c) perspectives and experiences of AI and d) knowledge of AI in radiography. Edgars Schein's model of organizational culture was employed to analyse Nordic radiographers' perspectives on AI.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Overall, a total of 421 respondents participated in the survey. A majority were positive/somewhat positive towards AI in radiography e.g., 77.9 % (n = 342) thought that AI would have a positive effect on the profession, and 26% thought that AI would reduce the administrative workload. Most radiographers agreed or strongly agreed that clinicians may have access to AI generated reports (76.8 %, n = 297). Nevertheless, a total of 86 (20.1%) agree or somewhat agreed that AI a potential risk for radiography.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Nordic radiographers are generally positive towards AI, yet uncertainties regarding its implementation persist. The findings underscore the importance of understanding these challenges for the responsible integration of AI systems. Carefully weighing the expected influence of AI against key incentives will support a seamless integration of AI for the benefit not just of the patients, but also of the radiography profession.</p></div><div><h3>Implications for practice</h3><p>Understanding incentives factors and barriers can help address uncertainties during implementation of AI in clinical practice.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":47416,"journal":{"name":"Radiography","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S107881742400097X/pdfft?md5=4281273947ebe572f34f0f474e7c152e&pid=1-s2.0-S107881742400097X-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Radiography","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S107881742400097X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

The impact of artificial intelligence (AI) on the radiography profession remains uncertain. Although AI has been increasingly used in clinical radiography, the perspectives of the radiography professionals in Nordic countries have yet to be examined. The primary aim was to examine views of Nordic radiographers ‘on AI, with focus on perspectives, engagement, and knowledge of AI.

Methods

Radiographers from Denmark, Norway, Sweden, Iceland, Greenland, and the Faroe Island were invited through social media platforms to participate in an online survey from March to June 2023. The survey encompassed 29-items and included 4 sections a) demographics, b) barriers and enablers on AI, c) perspectives and experiences of AI and d) knowledge of AI in radiography. Edgars Schein's model of organizational culture was employed to analyse Nordic radiographers' perspectives on AI.

Results

Overall, a total of 421 respondents participated in the survey. A majority were positive/somewhat positive towards AI in radiography e.g., 77.9 % (n = 342) thought that AI would have a positive effect on the profession, and 26% thought that AI would reduce the administrative workload. Most radiographers agreed or strongly agreed that clinicians may have access to AI generated reports (76.8 %, n = 297). Nevertheless, a total of 86 (20.1%) agree or somewhat agreed that AI a potential risk for radiography.

Conclusion

Nordic radiographers are generally positive towards AI, yet uncertainties regarding its implementation persist. The findings underscore the importance of understanding these challenges for the responsible integration of AI systems. Carefully weighing the expected influence of AI against key incentives will support a seamless integration of AI for the benefit not just of the patients, but also of the radiography profession.

Implications for practice

Understanding incentives factors and barriers can help address uncertainties during implementation of AI in clinical practice.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
北欧放射学专业人工智能调查--放射学专业准备好进行文化变革了吗?
导言人工智能(AI)对放射学专业的影响仍不确定。虽然人工智能已越来越多地应用于临床放射学,但北欧国家放射学专业人员的观点仍有待研究。该研究的主要目的是考察北欧放射技师对人工智能的看法,重点关注他们对人工智能的观点、参与度和知识。方法通过社交媒体平台邀请丹麦、挪威、瑞典、冰岛、格陵兰岛和法罗群岛的放射技师参与 2023 年 3 月至 6 月的在线调查。调查包含 29 个项目,包括 4 个部分:a) 人口统计学;b) 人工智能的障碍和推动因素;c) 人工智能的观点和经验;d) 放射学中的人工智能知识。Edgars Schein 的组织文化模型被用来分析北欧放射技师对人工智能的看法。大多数人对人工智能在放射学中的应用持积极或略带积极的态度,例如,77.9%(n = 342)的人认为人工智能将对该行业产生积极影响,26%的人认为人工智能将减少行政工作量。大多数放射技师同意或非常同意临床医生可以获取人工智能生成的报告(76.8%,n = 297)。然而,共有 86 人(20.1%)同意或基本同意人工智能对放射学构成潜在风险。研究结果强调了了解这些挑战对于负责任地整合人工智能系统的重要性。仔细权衡人工智能的预期影响与关键激励因素,将有助于人工智能的无缝整合,这不仅有利于患者,也有利于放射学专业。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Radiography
Radiography RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING-
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
34.60%
发文量
169
审稿时长
63 days
期刊介绍: Radiography is an International, English language, peer-reviewed journal of diagnostic imaging and radiation therapy. Radiography is the official professional journal of the College of Radiographers and is published quarterly. Radiography aims to publish the highest quality material, both clinical and scientific, on all aspects of diagnostic imaging and radiation therapy and oncology.
期刊最新文献
CT metal artefact reduction for hip and shoulder implants using novel algorithms and machine learning: A systematic review with pairwise and network meta-analyses Clinical insights into cross-sectional imaging integration in radiography education Paediatric diagnostic reference levels for common computed tomography procedures: A systematic review “Making it work in the face of extreme adversity” - Exploring perceptions for the future of the imaging and oncology workforce using ‘soundbite’ interviews Radiographer Education and Learning in Artificial Intelligence (REAL-AI): A survey of radiographers, radiologists, and students’ knowledge of and attitude to education on AI
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1