NIPT for adult-onset conditions: Australian NIPT users' views

IF 1.7 2区 哲学 Q2 ETHICS Bioethics Pub Date : 2024-05-23 DOI:10.1111/bioe.13310
India R. Marks, Katrien Devolder, Hilary Bowman-Smart, Molly Johnston, Catherine Mills
{"title":"NIPT for adult-onset conditions: Australian NIPT users' views","authors":"India R. Marks,&nbsp;Katrien Devolder,&nbsp;Hilary Bowman-Smart,&nbsp;Molly Johnston,&nbsp;Catherine Mills","doi":"10.1111/bioe.13310","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Noninvasive prenatal testing (NIPT) has become widely available in recent years. While initially used to screen for trisomies 21, 18, and 13, the test has expanded to include a range of other conditions and will likely expand further. This paper addresses the ethical issues that arise from one particularly controversial potential use of NIPT: screening for adult-onset conditions (AOCs). We report data from our quantitative survey of Australian NIPT users' views on the ethical issues raised by NIPT for AOCs. The survey ascertained support for NIPT for several traits and conditions including AOCs. Participants were then asked about their level of concern around implications of screening for AOCs for the future child and parent(s). Descriptive and comparative data analyses were conducted. In total, 109 respondents were included in data analysis. The majority of respondents expressed support for NIPT screening for preventable (70.9%) and nonpreventable AOCs (80.8%). Most respondents indicated concern around potential harmful impacts associated with NIPT for AOCs, including the psychological impact on the future child and on the parent(s). Despite this, the majority of participants thought that continuation of a pregnancy known to be predisposed to an AOC is ethically acceptable. The implications of these data are critically discussed and used to inform the normative claim that prospective parents should be given access to NIPT for AOCs. The study contributes to a body of research debating the ethical acceptability and regulation of various applications of NIPT as screening panels expand.</p>","PeriodicalId":55379,"journal":{"name":"Bioethics","volume":"38 6","pages":"566-575"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/bioe.13310","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bioethics","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/bioe.13310","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ETHICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Noninvasive prenatal testing (NIPT) has become widely available in recent years. While initially used to screen for trisomies 21, 18, and 13, the test has expanded to include a range of other conditions and will likely expand further. This paper addresses the ethical issues that arise from one particularly controversial potential use of NIPT: screening for adult-onset conditions (AOCs). We report data from our quantitative survey of Australian NIPT users' views on the ethical issues raised by NIPT for AOCs. The survey ascertained support for NIPT for several traits and conditions including AOCs. Participants were then asked about their level of concern around implications of screening for AOCs for the future child and parent(s). Descriptive and comparative data analyses were conducted. In total, 109 respondents were included in data analysis. The majority of respondents expressed support for NIPT screening for preventable (70.9%) and nonpreventable AOCs (80.8%). Most respondents indicated concern around potential harmful impacts associated with NIPT for AOCs, including the psychological impact on the future child and on the parent(s). Despite this, the majority of participants thought that continuation of a pregnancy known to be predisposed to an AOC is ethically acceptable. The implications of these data are critically discussed and used to inform the normative claim that prospective parents should be given access to NIPT for AOCs. The study contributes to a body of research debating the ethical acceptability and regulation of various applications of NIPT as screening panels expand.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
成人发病的 NIPT:澳大利亚 NIPT 用户的观点。
无创产前检测(NIPT)近年来已广泛普及。该检测最初用于筛查 21、18 和 13 三体综合征,现在已扩展到包括一系列其他病症,并有可能进一步扩展。本文探讨了 NIPT 的一个特别有争议的潜在用途所引发的伦理问题:成人发病条件(AOC)筛查。我们报告了对澳大利亚 NIPT 用户进行的定量调查数据,这些用户对针对 AOCs 的 NIPT 所引发的伦理问题发表了看法。调查确定了对包括 AOCs 在内的几种性状和疾病进行 NIPT 的支持度。然后,还询问了参与者对 AOCs 筛查对未来孩子和父母的影响的关注程度。对数据进行了描述性和比较性分析。共有 109 位受访者参与了数据分析。大多数受访者表示支持对可预防(70.9%)和不可预防(80.8%)的 AOC 进行 NIPT 筛查。大多数受访者对与 AOC NIPT 相关的潜在有害影响表示担忧,包括对未来孩子和父母的心理影响。尽管如此,大多数受访者认为,在伦理上可以接受继续妊娠,因为已知妊娠易导致 AOC。我们对这些数据的影响进行了批判性讨论,并以此为依据提出了规范性主张,即未来的父母应该有机会进行 AOC 的 NIPT 检测。随着筛查范围的扩大,NIPT 的各种应用在伦理上的可接受性和监管问题也在争论之中,本研究为这方面的研究做出了贡献。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Bioethics
Bioethics 医学-医学:伦理
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
9.10%
发文量
127
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: As medical technology continues to develop, the subject of bioethics has an ever increasing practical relevance for all those working in philosophy, medicine, law, sociology, public policy, education and related fields. Bioethics provides a forum for well-argued articles on the ethical questions raised by current issues such as: international collaborative clinical research in developing countries; public health; infectious disease; AIDS; managed care; genomics and stem cell research. These questions are considered in relation to concrete ethical, legal and policy problems, or in terms of the fundamental concepts, principles and theories used in discussions of such problems. Bioethics also features regular Background Briefings on important current debates in the field. These feature articles provide excellent material for bioethics scholars, teachers and students alike.
期刊最新文献
Cracking the code of the slow code: A taxonomy of slow code practices and their clinical and ethical implications. Moral enhancement and cheapened achievement: Psychedelics, virtual reality and AI. Misaligned hope and conviction in health care. Contraceptive digital pills and sexual and reproductive healthcare of women with mental disabilities: Problem or solution? Ethical considerations for non-procreative uterus transplantation.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1