Evaluation of hospital-onset bacteraemia and fungaemia in the USA as a potential healthcare quality measure: a cross-sectional study.

IF 5.6 1区 医学 Q1 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES BMJ Quality & Safety Pub Date : 2024-07-22 DOI:10.1136/bmjqs-2023-016831
Surbhi Leekha, Gwen L Robinson, Jesse T Jacob, Scott Fridkin, Andi Shane, Anna Sick-Samuels, Aaron M Milstone, Rajeshwari Nair, Eli Perencevich, Mireia Puig-Asensio, Takaaki Kobayashi, Jeanmarie Mayer, Julia Lewis, Susan Bleasdale, Eric Wenzler, Alfredo J Mena Lora, Jonathan Baghdadi, Gregory M Schrank, Eli Wilber, Amalia A Aldredge, Joseph Sharp, Kelly E Dyer, Lea Kendrick, Viraj Ambalam, Scott Borgetti, Anna Carmack, Alexis Gushiken, Ashka Patel, Sujan Reddy, Clayton H Brown, Raymund B Dantes, Anthony D Harris
{"title":"Evaluation of hospital-onset bacteraemia and fungaemia in the USA as a potential healthcare quality measure: a cross-sectional study.","authors":"Surbhi Leekha, Gwen L Robinson, Jesse T Jacob, Scott Fridkin, Andi Shane, Anna Sick-Samuels, Aaron M Milstone, Rajeshwari Nair, Eli Perencevich, Mireia Puig-Asensio, Takaaki Kobayashi, Jeanmarie Mayer, Julia Lewis, Susan Bleasdale, Eric Wenzler, Alfredo J Mena Lora, Jonathan Baghdadi, Gregory M Schrank, Eli Wilber, Amalia A Aldredge, Joseph Sharp, Kelly E Dyer, Lea Kendrick, Viraj Ambalam, Scott Borgetti, Anna Carmack, Alexis Gushiken, Ashka Patel, Sujan Reddy, Clayton H Brown, Raymund B Dantes, Anthony D Harris","doi":"10.1136/bmjqs-2023-016831","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Hospital-onset bacteraemia and fungaemia (HOB) is being explored as a surveillance and quality metric. The objectives of the current study were to determine sources and preventability of HOB in hospitalised patients in the USA and to identify factors associated with perceived preventability.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a cross-sectional study of HOB events at 10 academic and three community hospitals using structured chart review. HOB was defined as a blood culture on or after hospital day 4 with growth of one or more bacterial or fungal organisms. HOB events were stratified by commensal and non-commensal organisms. Medical resident physicians, infectious disease fellows or infection preventionists reviewed charts to determine HOB source, and infectious disease physicians with training in infection prevention/hospital epidemiology rated preventability from 1 to 6 (1=definitely preventable to 6=definitely not preventable) using a structured guide. Ratings of 1-3 were collectively considered 'potentially preventable' and 4-6 'potentially not preventable'.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 1789 HOB events with non-commensal organisms, gastrointestinal (including neutropenic translocation) (35%) and endovascular (32%) were the most common sources. Overall, 636/1789 (36%) non-commensal and 238/320 (74%) commensal HOB events were rated potentially preventable. In logistic regression analysis among non-commensal HOB events, events attributed to intravascular catheter-related infection, indwelling urinary catheter-related infection and surgical site infection had higher odds of being rated preventable while events with neutropenia, immunosuppression, gastrointestinal sources, polymicrobial cultures and previous positive blood culture in the same admission had lower odds of being rated preventable, compared with events without those attributes. Of 636 potentially preventable non-commensal HOB events, 47% were endovascular in origin, followed by gastrointestinal, respiratory and urinary sources; approximately 40% of those events would not be captured through existing healthcare-associated infection surveillance.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Factors identified as associated with higher or lower preventability should be used to guide inclusion, exclusion and risk adjustment for an HOB-related quality metric.</p>","PeriodicalId":9077,"journal":{"name":"BMJ Quality & Safety","volume":" ","pages":"487-498"},"PeriodicalIF":5.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11287649/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMJ Quality & Safety","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjqs-2023-016831","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Hospital-onset bacteraemia and fungaemia (HOB) is being explored as a surveillance and quality metric. The objectives of the current study were to determine sources and preventability of HOB in hospitalised patients in the USA and to identify factors associated with perceived preventability.

Methods: We conducted a cross-sectional study of HOB events at 10 academic and three community hospitals using structured chart review. HOB was defined as a blood culture on or after hospital day 4 with growth of one or more bacterial or fungal organisms. HOB events were stratified by commensal and non-commensal organisms. Medical resident physicians, infectious disease fellows or infection preventionists reviewed charts to determine HOB source, and infectious disease physicians with training in infection prevention/hospital epidemiology rated preventability from 1 to 6 (1=definitely preventable to 6=definitely not preventable) using a structured guide. Ratings of 1-3 were collectively considered 'potentially preventable' and 4-6 'potentially not preventable'.

Results: Among 1789 HOB events with non-commensal organisms, gastrointestinal (including neutropenic translocation) (35%) and endovascular (32%) were the most common sources. Overall, 636/1789 (36%) non-commensal and 238/320 (74%) commensal HOB events were rated potentially preventable. In logistic regression analysis among non-commensal HOB events, events attributed to intravascular catheter-related infection, indwelling urinary catheter-related infection and surgical site infection had higher odds of being rated preventable while events with neutropenia, immunosuppression, gastrointestinal sources, polymicrobial cultures and previous positive blood culture in the same admission had lower odds of being rated preventable, compared with events without those attributes. Of 636 potentially preventable non-commensal HOB events, 47% were endovascular in origin, followed by gastrointestinal, respiratory and urinary sources; approximately 40% of those events would not be captured through existing healthcare-associated infection surveillance.

Discussion: Factors identified as associated with higher or lower preventability should be used to guide inclusion, exclusion and risk adjustment for an HOB-related quality metric.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
将美国医院突发菌血症和真菌血症作为潜在的医疗质量衡量标准进行评估:一项横断面研究。
背景:目前正在探索将医院感染的菌血症和真菌病(HOB)作为监测和质量指标。本研究的目的是确定美国住院病人中 HAB 的来源和可预防性,并找出与可预防性相关的因素:我们通过结构化病历审查对 10 家学术医院和 3 家社区医院的 HOB 事件进行了横断面研究。HOB的定义是在住院第4天或之后的血液培养中生长出一种或多种细菌或真菌。HOB事件按共生菌和非共生菌进行分层。住院医师、传染病研究员或感染预防专家审查病历以确定 HOB 来源,接受过感染预防/医院流行病学培训的传染病医生使用结构化指南对可预防性进行 1-6 分级(1=绝对可预防,6=绝对不可预防)。1-3分被统称为 "潜在可预防",4-6分被统称为 "潜在不可预防":在 1789 例感染非同种微生物的 HOB 事件中,胃肠道(包括中性粒细胞转位)(35%)和血管内(32%)是最常见的来源。总体而言,636/1789(36%)起非共生HOB事件和238/320(74%)起共生HOB事件被评为潜在可预防事件。在对非共感性 HOB 事件进行的逻辑回归分析中,由血管内导管相关感染、留置导尿管相关感染和手术部位感染引起的事件被评为可预防的几率较高,而由中性粒细胞减少症、免疫抑制、胃肠道来源、多微生物培养和之前在同一次入院中血培养阳性引起的事件被评为可预防的几率较低。在636起潜在可预防的非同源性HOB事件中,47%源于血管内感染,其次是胃肠道感染、呼吸道感染和泌尿道感染;这些事件中约有40%不会被现有的医疗相关感染监测所捕获:讨论:已确定的可预防性较高或较低的相关因素应用于指导纳入、排除和风险调整 HOB 相关质量指标。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
BMJ Quality & Safety
BMJ Quality & Safety HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES-
CiteScore
9.80
自引率
7.40%
发文量
104
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: BMJ Quality & Safety (previously Quality & Safety in Health Care) is an international peer review publication providing research, opinions, debates and reviews for academics, clinicians and healthcare managers focused on the quality and safety of health care and the science of improvement. The journal receives approximately 1000 manuscripts a year and has an acceptance rate for original research of 12%. Time from submission to first decision averages 22 days and accepted articles are typically published online within 20 days. Its current impact factor is 3.281.
期刊最新文献
What do clinical practice guidelines say about deprescribing? A scoping review. Understanding the enablers and barriers to implementing a patient-led escalation system: a qualitative study. Assessing patient work system factors for medication management during transition of care among older adults: an observational study. Sex, drugs and rock 'n' roll: the only reasons for regulators to target individuals. Patient-activated escalation in hospital: patients and their families are ready!
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1