The use of happy faces as visual stimuli improves the performance of the hybrid SSVEP+P300 brain computer interface

IF 2.3 4区 医学 Q2 BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS Journal of Neuroscience Methods Pub Date : 2024-05-21 DOI:10.1016/j.jneumeth.2024.110170
Deepak D. Kapgate
{"title":"The use of happy faces as visual stimuli improves the performance of the hybrid SSVEP+P300 brain computer interface","authors":"Deepak D. Kapgate","doi":"10.1016/j.jneumeth.2024.110170","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>This study illustrates a hybrid brain-computer interface (BCI) in which steady-state visual evoked potentials (SSVEP) and event-related potentials (P300) are evoked simultaneously. The goal of this study was to improve the performance of the current hybrid SSVEP+P300 BCI systems by incorporating a happy face into visual stimuli.</p></div><div><h3>New method</h3><p>In this study, happy and sad faces were added to a visual stimulus to induce stronger cortical signals in a hybrid SSVEP+P300 BCI. Additionally, we developed a paradigm in which SSVEP responses were triggered by non-face stimuli, whereas P300 responses were triggered by face stimuli. We tested four paradigms: happy face paradigm (HF), sad face paradigm (SF), happy face and flicker paradigm (HFF), and sad face and flicker paradigm (SFF).</p></div><div><h3>Results and conclusions</h3><p>The results demonstrated that the HFF paradigm elicited more robust cortical responses, which resulted in enhanced system accuracy and information transfer rate (ITR). The HFF paradigm has a system communication rate of 25.9 bits per second and an average accuracy of 96.1%. Compared with other paradigms, the HFF paradigm is the best choice for BCI applications because it has the highest ITR and maximum level of comfort.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":16415,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Neuroscience Methods","volume":"408 ","pages":"Article 110170"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Neuroscience Methods","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0165027024001158","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

This study illustrates a hybrid brain-computer interface (BCI) in which steady-state visual evoked potentials (SSVEP) and event-related potentials (P300) are evoked simultaneously. The goal of this study was to improve the performance of the current hybrid SSVEP+P300 BCI systems by incorporating a happy face into visual stimuli.

New method

In this study, happy and sad faces were added to a visual stimulus to induce stronger cortical signals in a hybrid SSVEP+P300 BCI. Additionally, we developed a paradigm in which SSVEP responses were triggered by non-face stimuli, whereas P300 responses were triggered by face stimuli. We tested four paradigms: happy face paradigm (HF), sad face paradigm (SF), happy face and flicker paradigm (HFF), and sad face and flicker paradigm (SFF).

Results and conclusions

The results demonstrated that the HFF paradigm elicited more robust cortical responses, which resulted in enhanced system accuracy and information transfer rate (ITR). The HFF paradigm has a system communication rate of 25.9 bits per second and an average accuracy of 96.1%. Compared with other paradigms, the HFF paradigm is the best choice for BCI applications because it has the highest ITR and maximum level of comfort.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
使用快乐的面孔作为视觉刺激可提高混合 SSVEP+P300 脑机接口的性能
背景:本研究展示了一种混合型脑机接口(BCI),其中同时诱发稳态视觉诱发电位(SSVEP)和事件相关电位(P300)。本研究的目标是通过在视觉刺激中加入快乐的脸来提高当前混合 SSVEP+P300 BCI 系统的性能:在这项研究中,我们在视觉刺激中加入了快乐和悲伤的面孔,以在混合 SSVEP+P300 BCI 中诱发更强的皮层信号。此外,我们还开发了一种范式,其中SSVEP反应由非人脸刺激触发,而P300反应则由人脸刺激触发。我们测试了四种范式:快乐脸部范式(HF)、悲伤脸部范式(SF)、快乐脸部和闪烁范式(HFF)以及悲伤脸部和闪烁范式(SFF):结果表明,HFF范式能引起更强的皮层反应,从而提高系统的准确性和信息传递率(ITR)。HFF 范式的系统通信速率为每秒 25.9 比特,平均准确率为 96.1%。与其他范式相比,HFF 范式具有最高的信息传输率和最大程度的舒适性,因此是 BCI 应用的最佳选择。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Neuroscience Methods
Journal of Neuroscience Methods 医学-神经科学
CiteScore
7.10
自引率
3.30%
发文量
226
审稿时长
52 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Neuroscience Methods publishes papers that describe new methods that are specifically for neuroscience research conducted in invertebrates, vertebrates or in man. Major methodological improvements or important refinements of established neuroscience methods are also considered for publication. The Journal''s Scope includes all aspects of contemporary neuroscience research, including anatomical, behavioural, biochemical, cellular, computational, molecular, invasive and non-invasive imaging, optogenetic, and physiological research investigations.
期刊最新文献
A Single-Stitch Technique on the Internal Carotid Artery for Establishing the MCAO Model. Exploration of the mental attention mechanisms in motor imagery-based EEG decoding. Refined affinity purification protocol for CAMs using minimal mouse brain material. TASNet: A tri-modal attentive scale robust adaptive fusion framework for progressive mild cognitive impairment classification. Neurophysiological Metrics of Surprise during Locomotor Uncertainty.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1