Maternal cell contamination in postnatal umbilical cord blood samples implies a low risk for genetic misdiagnoses.

IF 2.7 2区 医学 Q2 GENETICS & HEREDITY Prenatal Diagnosis Pub Date : 2024-10-01 Epub Date: 2024-05-23 DOI:10.1002/pd.6595
Sanne P Smeekens, Maike Leferink, Helger G Yntema, Erik-Jan Kamsteeg
{"title":"Maternal cell contamination in postnatal umbilical cord blood samples implies a low risk for genetic misdiagnoses.","authors":"Sanne P Smeekens, Maike Leferink, Helger G Yntema, Erik-Jan Kamsteeg","doi":"10.1002/pd.6595","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Maternal cell contamination (MCC) poses a risk for misdiagnosis in prenatal genetic testing, and is examined in accredited diagnostic laboratories However, the awareness of possible MCC in perinatal/postnatal genetic testing, mainly of umbilical cord blood (CB), is lower.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>We investigated the rate of MCC in DNA from both umbilical CB samples and umbilical cord samples that were sent to our diagnostic laboratory for diagnostic testing between 1995 and 2021 (n = 236).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>MCC was detected in 4% of umbilical CB samples, and in one umbilical cord sample. Particularly tests enriching for a specific variant are very sensitive for low amounts of MCC, as we emphasize here with a false positive diagnosis of myotonic dystrophy type 1 in a newborn.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Overall, with appropriate collection and use, umbilical CB and umbilical cord samples are suitable for genetic testing based on the low rates of MCC and misdiagnosis. These findings do however underline the importance of routine MCC testing in umbilical CB samples and umbilical cord samples for both requesting clinicians and diagnostic genetic laboratories.</p>","PeriodicalId":20387,"journal":{"name":"Prenatal Diagnosis","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Prenatal Diagnosis","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/pd.6595","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/5/23 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GENETICS & HEREDITY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Maternal cell contamination (MCC) poses a risk for misdiagnosis in prenatal genetic testing, and is examined in accredited diagnostic laboratories However, the awareness of possible MCC in perinatal/postnatal genetic testing, mainly of umbilical cord blood (CB), is lower.

Method: We investigated the rate of MCC in DNA from both umbilical CB samples and umbilical cord samples that were sent to our diagnostic laboratory for diagnostic testing between 1995 and 2021 (n = 236).

Results: MCC was detected in 4% of umbilical CB samples, and in one umbilical cord sample. Particularly tests enriching for a specific variant are very sensitive for low amounts of MCC, as we emphasize here with a false positive diagnosis of myotonic dystrophy type 1 in a newborn.

Conclusions: Overall, with appropriate collection and use, umbilical CB and umbilical cord samples are suitable for genetic testing based on the low rates of MCC and misdiagnosis. These findings do however underline the importance of routine MCC testing in umbilical CB samples and umbilical cord samples for both requesting clinicians and diagnostic genetic laboratories.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
产后脐带血样本中的母体细胞污染意味着基因误诊的风险很低。
目的:在产前基因检测中,母细胞污染(MCC)有可能造成误诊,并在获得认证的诊断实验室中进行检查。然而,人们对围产期/产后基因检测(主要是脐带血(CB))中可能出现的母细胞污染的认识却较低:方法:我们调查了 1995 年至 2021 年间送至本诊断实验室进行诊断检测的脐带血样本和脐带样本 DNA 中的 MCC 发生率(n = 236):结果:4%的脐带 CB 样本和一个脐带样本中检测到了 MCC。特别是富含特定变异体的检测对低量的 MCC 非常敏感,正如我们在这里强调的新生儿肌营养不良 1 型的假阳性诊断:总体而言,只要采集和使用得当,脐带 CB 样本和脐带样本都适合用于基因检测,因为它们的 MCC 和误诊率都很低。然而,这些发现确实强调了对脐带 CB 样本和脐带样本进行常规 MCC 检测对申请临床医生和基因诊断实验室的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Prenatal Diagnosis
Prenatal Diagnosis 医学-妇产科学
CiteScore
5.80
自引率
13.30%
发文量
204
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Prenatal Diagnosis welcomes submissions in all aspects of prenatal diagnosis with a particular focus on areas in which molecular biology and genetics interface with prenatal care and therapy, encompassing: all aspects of fetal imaging, including sonography and magnetic resonance imaging; prenatal cytogenetics, including molecular studies and array CGH; prenatal screening studies; fetal cells and cell-free nucleic acids in maternal blood and other fluids; preimplantation genetic diagnosis (PGD); prenatal diagnosis of single gene disorders, including metabolic disorders; fetal therapy; fetal and placental development and pathology; development and evaluation of laboratory services for prenatal diagnosis; psychosocial, legal, ethical and economic aspects of prenatal diagnosis; prenatal genetic counseling
期刊最新文献
Short- and Long-Term Outcomes of Prenatally Identified Congenital Aqueductal Stenosis by Fetal MRI. Prenatal Diagnosis of Warsaw Breakage Syndrome: Fetal Compound Heterozygous Variants in the DDX11 Gene Associated With Growth Restriction, Cerebral, and Extra-Cerebral Malformations. Aberrant Fetal Brain Sulcus Formation: A Clue to the Diagnosis of Sotos Syndrome. Application of Genetic Origin Analysis of Copy Number Variations in Non-Invasive Prenatal Testing. Contemporary Outcomes of a National Fetal Spina Bifida Surgery Service.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1