[Interventional therapy of pulmonary embolism - update].

Deutsche medizinische Wochenschrift (1946) Pub Date : 2024-06-01 Epub Date: 2024-05-23 DOI:10.1055/a-2133-8319
Wulf D Ito
{"title":"[Interventional therapy of pulmonary embolism - update].","authors":"Wulf D Ito","doi":"10.1055/a-2133-8319","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Several catheter-based systems have been developed for interventional recanalization of pulmonary embolism. These include local ultrasound assisted thrombolysis (EKOS), in-toto-thrombectomy via retriever and aspiration system (FlowTriever) and the Indigo mechanical aspiration system. Safety and efficacy in the removal of thrombus have been demonstrated for all systems. Interventional recanalization strategies for high- and intermediate-high risk pulmonary embolism are potentially more effective in the removal of thrombus and restoration of right heart function than systemic thrombolysis with a lower risk of major bleeding complications. Preliminary data from registries and observational studies are very promising whereas the evidence for systemic thrombolysis treatment in high and intermediate-high risk pulmonary embolism is low. Randomized controlled clinical trials are currently performed comparing catheter based interventional therapies to systemic thrombolysis for the treatment of intermediate-high risk pulmonary embolisms. Primary outcome measurements include mortality, hemodynamic collapse, and major bleedings. Results are expected in 2025. The introduction of interventional therapies for pulmonary embolism was accompanied by an increased awareness of the complexity of pulmonary embolism management. The need for specialized interdisciplinary pulmonary embolism response teams (PERT-teams) and a well-structured approach including a PDCA cycle was recognized.</p>","PeriodicalId":93975,"journal":{"name":"Deutsche medizinische Wochenschrift (1946)","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Deutsche medizinische Wochenschrift (1946)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2133-8319","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/5/23 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Several catheter-based systems have been developed for interventional recanalization of pulmonary embolism. These include local ultrasound assisted thrombolysis (EKOS), in-toto-thrombectomy via retriever and aspiration system (FlowTriever) and the Indigo mechanical aspiration system. Safety and efficacy in the removal of thrombus have been demonstrated for all systems. Interventional recanalization strategies for high- and intermediate-high risk pulmonary embolism are potentially more effective in the removal of thrombus and restoration of right heart function than systemic thrombolysis with a lower risk of major bleeding complications. Preliminary data from registries and observational studies are very promising whereas the evidence for systemic thrombolysis treatment in high and intermediate-high risk pulmonary embolism is low. Randomized controlled clinical trials are currently performed comparing catheter based interventional therapies to systemic thrombolysis for the treatment of intermediate-high risk pulmonary embolisms. Primary outcome measurements include mortality, hemodynamic collapse, and major bleedings. Results are expected in 2025. The introduction of interventional therapies for pulmonary embolism was accompanied by an increased awareness of the complexity of pulmonary embolism management. The need for specialized interdisciplinary pulmonary embolism response teams (PERT-teams) and a well-structured approach including a PDCA cycle was recognized.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
[肺栓塞的介入治疗--最新进展]。
目前已开发出几种基于导管的肺栓塞介入再通系统。这些系统包括局部超声辅助溶栓系统(EKOS)、通过回流器和抽吸系统(FlowTriever)进行的血栓切除术以及 Indigo 机械抽吸系统。所有系统在清除血栓方面的安全性和有效性均已得到证实。与全身溶栓相比,高危和中高危肺栓塞的介入再通策略在清除血栓和恢复右心功能方面可能更有效,而且大出血并发症的风险更低。登记册和观察性研究的初步数据非常有前景,而系统性溶栓治疗高危和中高危肺栓塞的证据却很少。目前正在进行随机对照临床试验,比较导管介入疗法和全身溶栓疗法对中高风险肺栓塞的治疗效果。主要结果包括死亡率、血流动力学衰竭和大出血。预计将于 2025 年得出结果。在引入肺栓塞介入疗法的同时,人们对肺栓塞治疗的复杂性也有了进一步认识。人们认识到,有必要建立专门的跨学科肺栓塞应对团队(PERT-team),并采用包括 PDCA 循环在内的结构合理的方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
[Shortfalls of new data 2017-2020 in the German transplant registry]. [Small intestinal bacterial overgrowth (SIBO) - Therapy, nutrition, microbiome]. [65 year-old patient with chest pain and dyspnea following an intercontinental flight]. [Food allergies: A diagnostic challenge of increasing importance]. [IgE- and non-IgE-mediated food allergies - an overview].
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1