Understanding the landscape of software modelling assistants for MDSE tools: A systematic mapping

IF 3.8 2区 计算机科学 Q2 COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS Information and Software Technology Pub Date : 2024-05-21 DOI:10.1016/j.infsof.2024.107492
David Mosquera , Marcela Ruiz , Oscar Pastor , Jürgen Spielberger
{"title":"Understanding the landscape of software modelling assistants for MDSE tools: A systematic mapping","authors":"David Mosquera ,&nbsp;Marcela Ruiz ,&nbsp;Oscar Pastor ,&nbsp;Jürgen Spielberger","doi":"10.1016/j.infsof.2024.107492","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Context</h3><p>Model Driven Software Engineering (MDSE) and low-code/no-code software development tools promise to increase quality and productivity by modelling instead of coding software. One of the major advantages of modelling software is the increased possibility of involving diverse stakeholders since it removes the barrier of being IT experts to actively participate in software production processes. From an academic and industry point of view, the main question remains: What has been proposed to assist humans in software modelling tasks?</p></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><p>In this paper, we systematically elucidate the state of the art in assistants for software modelling and their use in MDSE and low-code/no-code tools.</p></div><div><h3>Method</h3><p>We conducted a systematic mapping to review the state of the art and answer the following research questions: i) how is software modelling assisted? ii) what goals and limitations do existing modelling assistance proposals report? iii) which evaluation metrics and target users do existing modelling assistance proposals consider? For this purpose, we selected 58 proposals from 3.176 screened records and reviewed 17 MDSE and low-code/no-code tools from main market players published by the Gartner Magic Quadrant.</p></div><div><h3>Result</h3><p>We clustered existing proposals regarding their modelling assistance strategies, goals, limitations, evaluation metrics, and target users, both in research and practice.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>We found that both academic and industry proposals recognise the value of assisting software modelling. However, documentation about MDSE assistants’ limitations, evaluation metrics, and target users is scarce or non-existent. With the advent of artificial intelligence, we expect more assistants for MDSE and low-code/no-code software development will emerge, making imperative the need for well-founded frameworks for designing modelling assistants focused on addressing target users’ needs and advancing the state of the art.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":54983,"journal":{"name":"Information and Software Technology","volume":"173 ","pages":"Article 107492"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0950584924000971/pdfft?md5=6da25ebb0cb2c28f672df388b54839e1&pid=1-s2.0-S0950584924000971-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Information and Software Technology","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0950584924000971","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Context

Model Driven Software Engineering (MDSE) and low-code/no-code software development tools promise to increase quality and productivity by modelling instead of coding software. One of the major advantages of modelling software is the increased possibility of involving diverse stakeholders since it removes the barrier of being IT experts to actively participate in software production processes. From an academic and industry point of view, the main question remains: What has been proposed to assist humans in software modelling tasks?

Objective

In this paper, we systematically elucidate the state of the art in assistants for software modelling and their use in MDSE and low-code/no-code tools.

Method

We conducted a systematic mapping to review the state of the art and answer the following research questions: i) how is software modelling assisted? ii) what goals and limitations do existing modelling assistance proposals report? iii) which evaluation metrics and target users do existing modelling assistance proposals consider? For this purpose, we selected 58 proposals from 3.176 screened records and reviewed 17 MDSE and low-code/no-code tools from main market players published by the Gartner Magic Quadrant.

Result

We clustered existing proposals regarding their modelling assistance strategies, goals, limitations, evaluation metrics, and target users, both in research and practice.

Conclusions

We found that both academic and industry proposals recognise the value of assisting software modelling. However, documentation about MDSE assistants’ limitations, evaluation metrics, and target users is scarce or non-existent. With the advent of artificial intelligence, we expect more assistants for MDSE and low-code/no-code software development will emerge, making imperative the need for well-founded frameworks for designing modelling assistants focused on addressing target users’ needs and advancing the state of the art.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
了解用于 MDSE 工具的软件建模辅助工具的情况:系统制图
背景建模驱动软件工程(MDSE)和低代码/无代码软件开发工具承诺通过建模而不是编码软件来提高质量和生产率。建模软件的主要优势之一是增加了不同利益相关者参与的可能性,因为它消除了信息技术专家积极参与软件生产过程的障碍。从学术界和工业界的角度来看,主要问题依然存在:在本文中,我们系统地阐明了软件建模辅助工具的发展现状,以及它们在 MDSE 和低代码/无代码工具中的应用。为此,我们从 3.176 条筛选记录中选取了 58 项提案,并查阅了 Gartner Magic Quadrant 公布的主要市场参与者的 17 种 MDSE 和低代码/无代码工具。结果我们对现有提案进行了分类,涉及其建模辅助策略、目标、局限性、评估指标和目标用户,包括研究和实践两方面。然而,有关 MDSE 辅助工具的局限性、评估指标和目标用户的文献却很少或根本不存在。随着人工智能时代的到来,我们预计将会出现更多用于 MDSE 和低代码/无代码软件开发的辅助工具,这使得设计建模辅助工具的框架必须有充分的依据,以满足目标用户的需求并推进技术发展。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Information and Software Technology
Information and Software Technology 工程技术-计算机:软件工程
CiteScore
9.10
自引率
7.70%
发文量
164
审稿时长
9.6 weeks
期刊介绍: Information and Software Technology is the international archival journal focusing on research and experience that contributes to the improvement of software development practices. The journal''s scope includes methods and techniques to better engineer software and manage its development. Articles submitted for review should have a clear component of software engineering or address ways to improve the engineering and management of software development. Areas covered by the journal include: • Software management, quality and metrics, • Software processes, • Software architecture, modelling, specification, design and programming • Functional and non-functional software requirements • Software testing and verification & validation • Empirical studies of all aspects of engineering and managing software development Short Communications is a new section dedicated to short papers addressing new ideas, controversial opinions, "Negative" results and much more. Read the Guide for authors for more information. The journal encourages and welcomes submissions of systematic literature studies (reviews and maps) within the scope of the journal. Information and Software Technology is the premiere outlet for systematic literature studies in software engineering.
期刊最新文献
Editorial Board Markov model based coverage testing of deep learning software systems Improving operational decision-making through decision mining - utilizing method engineering for the creation of a decision mining method A software product line approach for developing hybrid software systems Systematic mapping study on requirements engineering for regulatory compliance of software systems
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1