Inter- and intraspecific stomatal morphological traits vary in response to topographic habitat changes

IF 2.2 3区 环境科学与生态学 Q2 ECOLOGY Journal of Vegetation Science Pub Date : 2024-05-23 DOI:10.1111/jvs.13266
Hang Zhao, Weilin Zhu, Mengjun Qu, Jianming Wang, Shuai Shao, Xun Lei, Jingwen Li
{"title":"Inter- and intraspecific stomatal morphological traits vary in response to topographic habitat changes","authors":"Hang Zhao,&nbsp;Weilin Zhu,&nbsp;Mengjun Qu,&nbsp;Jianming Wang,&nbsp;Shuai Shao,&nbsp;Xun Lei,&nbsp;Jingwen Li","doi":"10.1111/jvs.13266","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Questions</h3>\n \n <p>Stomata can reflect the plant's adaptation to environmental changes. However, the variation patterns of stomatal traits across different habitats and their relationships with environmental drivers are still poorly understood. Here, we assessed the extent of interspecific and intraspecific variation in stomatal traits in two typical riparian forests, and investigated how stomatal traits adapt to habitat change as well as trait–environment relationships.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Location</h3>\n \n <p>The Irtysh River Basin in China.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>We measured the stomatal density (SD), stomatal size (SS), and stomatal relative area (SRA) of dominant plant species from two riparian forests: (1) a riparian forest in the valley and (2) a riparian forest in the pediment plain. We analyzed the stomatal trait variation patterns of dominant plant species in different habitats. We then quantified the magnitude of intraspecific and interspecific stomatal trait variability and evaluated the relationships between stomatal traits and environmental factors.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>We found that SD and SRA were significantly higher in pediment plain forests than in valley forests, whereas SS was not significantly different between these habitats. The SD and SRA of trees in pediment plain forests were significantly higher than those in valley forests, whereas there were no significant differences in understory plants between habitats. The interspecific variation in each stomatal trait was significantly higher than the intraspecific variation. Stomatal traits were more related to the soil environment than to climatic factors.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>Response strategies of stomatal traits to habitat changes differed between species and functional groups, and trait–environment relationships depended on the habitat type of the riparian forest. Our analysis of stomata trait variation implies adaptive strategies in species of natural riparian forest. Insights into trait–environment relationships could be used to predict carbon and water cycling, and vegetation changes in riparian forests of arid regions, especially in the context of climate change.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":49965,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Vegetation Science","volume":"35 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Vegetation Science","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jvs.13266","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Questions

Stomata can reflect the plant's adaptation to environmental changes. However, the variation patterns of stomatal traits across different habitats and their relationships with environmental drivers are still poorly understood. Here, we assessed the extent of interspecific and intraspecific variation in stomatal traits in two typical riparian forests, and investigated how stomatal traits adapt to habitat change as well as trait–environment relationships.

Location

The Irtysh River Basin in China.

Methods

We measured the stomatal density (SD), stomatal size (SS), and stomatal relative area (SRA) of dominant plant species from two riparian forests: (1) a riparian forest in the valley and (2) a riparian forest in the pediment plain. We analyzed the stomatal trait variation patterns of dominant plant species in different habitats. We then quantified the magnitude of intraspecific and interspecific stomatal trait variability and evaluated the relationships between stomatal traits and environmental factors.

Results

We found that SD and SRA were significantly higher in pediment plain forests than in valley forests, whereas SS was not significantly different between these habitats. The SD and SRA of trees in pediment plain forests were significantly higher than those in valley forests, whereas there were no significant differences in understory plants between habitats. The interspecific variation in each stomatal trait was significantly higher than the intraspecific variation. Stomatal traits were more related to the soil environment than to climatic factors.

Conclusions

Response strategies of stomatal traits to habitat changes differed between species and functional groups, and trait–environment relationships depended on the habitat type of the riparian forest. Our analysis of stomata trait variation implies adaptive strategies in species of natural riparian forest. Insights into trait–environment relationships could be used to predict carbon and water cycling, and vegetation changes in riparian forests of arid regions, especially in the context of climate change.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
种间和种内气孔形态特征随地形生境变化而变化
问题 气孔可以反映植物对环境变化的适应性。然而,人们对气孔性状在不同生境中的变异模式及其与环境驱动因素的关系仍然知之甚少。在此,我们评估了两种典型河岸林气孔性状的种间和种内变异程度,并研究了气孔性状如何适应生境变化以及性状与环境的关系。 地点 中国额尔齐斯河流域。 方法 我们测量了两片河岸林(1)河谷河岸林和(2)山麓平原河岸林中优势植物物种的气孔密度(SD)、气孔大小(SS)和气孔相对面积(SRA)。我们分析了不同生境中优势植物物种的气孔性状变异模式。然后,我们量化了种内和种间气孔性状变异的程度,并评估了气孔性状与环境因素之间的关系。 结果 我们发现,山麓平原森林的SD和SRA显著高于山谷森林,而SS在这些生境之间没有显著差异。山麓平原森林树木的SD和SRA明显高于山谷森林,而林下植物的SD和SRA在不同生境之间没有明显差异。各气孔性状的种间变异明显高于种内变异。气孔性状与土壤环境的关系大于与气候因素的关系。 结论 不同物种和功能群的气孔性状对生境变化的响应策略不同,性状与环境的关系取决于河岸森林的生境类型。我们对气孔性状变异的分析意味着自然河岸森林物种的适应策略。洞察性状与环境的关系可用于预测干旱地区河岸森林的碳和水循环以及植被变化,尤其是在气候变化的背景下。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Vegetation Science
Journal of Vegetation Science 环境科学-林学
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
3.60%
发文量
60
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Vegetation Science publishes papers on all aspects of plant community ecology, with particular emphasis on papers that develop new concepts or methods, test theory, identify general patterns, or that are otherwise likely to interest a broad international readership. Papers may focus on any aspect of vegetation science, e.g. community structure (including community assembly and plant functional types), biodiversity (including species richness and composition), spatial patterns (including plant geography and landscape ecology), temporal changes (including demography, community dynamics and palaeoecology) and processes (including ecophysiology), provided the focus is on increasing our understanding of plant communities. The Journal publishes papers on the ecology of a single species only if it plays a key role in structuring plant communities. Papers that apply ecological concepts, theories and methods to the vegetation management, conservation and restoration, and papers on vegetation survey should be directed to our associate journal, Applied Vegetation Science journal.
期刊最新文献
Role of Plant Specialists in Fine-Scale Diversity–Area Relationships (DARs) in Southern European Atlantic Coastal Dunes Willow above, changes below: Seedless tree invader impacts riparian seed bank in the Patagonian ecotone Repeat photography reveals long-term climate change impacts on sub-Antarctic tundra vegetation Mammalian herbivory alters structure, composition and edaphic conditions of a grey-dune community Short-term vegetation shifts in an alpine grassland under current and simulated climate change
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1