Proximal femoral varus osteotomy for Legg–Calvé–Perthes disease: Do age and lateral pillar classifications influence short-to-mid-term clinical and radiological outcomes?

IF 2.2 3区 医学 Q2 ORTHOPEDICS Orthopaedics & Traumatology-Surgery & Research Pub Date : 2025-11-01 Epub Date: 2024-05-22 DOI:10.1016/j.otsr.2024.103909
Nima Hoseini-Zare , Peyman Mirghaderi , Brice Ilharreborde , Kiarash Roustai-Geraylow , Alireza Moharrami , Taghi Baghdadi , Seyed Hadi Kalantar , Mohammad Hossein Nabian
{"title":"Proximal femoral varus osteotomy for Legg–Calvé–Perthes disease: Do age and lateral pillar classifications influence short-to-mid-term clinical and radiological outcomes?","authors":"Nima Hoseini-Zare ,&nbsp;Peyman Mirghaderi ,&nbsp;Brice Ilharreborde ,&nbsp;Kiarash Roustai-Geraylow ,&nbsp;Alireza Moharrami ,&nbsp;Taghi Baghdadi ,&nbsp;Seyed Hadi Kalantar ,&nbsp;Mohammad Hossein Nabian","doi":"10.1016/j.otsr.2024.103909","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div><span>Proximal femoral varus osteotomy (FVO) is one of the most used treatment methods with acceptable outcomes for Legg–Calvé–Perthes disease (LCPD). We aimed to investigate the influence of age at disease onset and the Lateral Pillar classification on clinical and radiological outcomes of FVO surgery LCPD patients between 6–12</span> <!-->years of age.</div></div><div><h3>Hypothesis</h3><div>Proximal FVO surgery in the early fragmentation phase of LCPD patients led to acceptable clinical and radiographic outcomes in a 3-year follow-up, regardless of preoperative age and Herring type.</div></div><div><h3>Material and methods</h3><div><span><span>Fifty patients with LCPD (Herring groups B, B/C, and C) who underwent FVO were retrospectively reviewed. We evaluated radiological [center-edge angle, extrusion index, epiphyseal index, acetabular index, articulo-trochanteric distance (ATD)] and clinical [hip abduction range of motion (ROM), Trendelenburg sign, pain, and </span>Harris hip score (HHS)] outcomes with a follow-up of 37.3</span> <!-->±<!--> <!-->10.5<!--> <!-->months (range: 24–180<!--> <!-->months). Finally, the overall treatment outcome was assessed using the Stulberg classification.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The ROC curve analysis did not reveal any significant relationship between age and clinical or radiological outcomes, and there was no predictable age cut-off for surgical outcomes (<em>p</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.13). No significant difference was found in Stulberg classification at the follow-up between patients with type B, B/C, and C of the lateral pillar (<em>p</em> <!-->&gt;<!--> <!-->0.05).</div></div><div><h3>Discussion</h3><div>Our results demonstrated that open-wedge proximal FVO surgery in the early fragmentation phase of LCPD patients led to acceptable clinical and radiographic outcomes in a 3-year follow-up. Each sample of our study was very small and a lot of variables were measured, making this result not adequately strong enough to draw a robust conclusion. However, FVO surgery remains a possible suggestion for patients in the early fragmentation phase, and age and lateral pillar type may not be limiting factors.</div></div><div><h3>Level of evidence</h3><div>IV; therapeutic retrospective cohort.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":54664,"journal":{"name":"Orthopaedics & Traumatology-Surgery & Research","volume":"111 7","pages":"Article 103909"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Orthopaedics & Traumatology-Surgery & Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1877056824001531","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/5/22 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

Proximal femoral varus osteotomy (FVO) is one of the most used treatment methods with acceptable outcomes for Legg–Calvé–Perthes disease (LCPD). We aimed to investigate the influence of age at disease onset and the Lateral Pillar classification on clinical and radiological outcomes of FVO surgery LCPD patients between 6–12 years of age.

Hypothesis

Proximal FVO surgery in the early fragmentation phase of LCPD patients led to acceptable clinical and radiographic outcomes in a 3-year follow-up, regardless of preoperative age and Herring type.

Material and methods

Fifty patients with LCPD (Herring groups B, B/C, and C) who underwent FVO were retrospectively reviewed. We evaluated radiological [center-edge angle, extrusion index, epiphyseal index, acetabular index, articulo-trochanteric distance (ATD)] and clinical [hip abduction range of motion (ROM), Trendelenburg sign, pain, and Harris hip score (HHS)] outcomes with a follow-up of 37.3 ± 10.5 months (range: 24–180 months). Finally, the overall treatment outcome was assessed using the Stulberg classification.

Results

The ROC curve analysis did not reveal any significant relationship between age and clinical or radiological outcomes, and there was no predictable age cut-off for surgical outcomes (p = 0.13). No significant difference was found in Stulberg classification at the follow-up between patients with type B, B/C, and C of the lateral pillar (p > 0.05).

Discussion

Our results demonstrated that open-wedge proximal FVO surgery in the early fragmentation phase of LCPD patients led to acceptable clinical and radiographic outcomes in a 3-year follow-up. Each sample of our study was very small and a lot of variables were measured, making this result not adequately strong enough to draw a robust conclusion. However, FVO surgery remains a possible suggestion for patients in the early fragmentation phase, and age and lateral pillar type may not be limiting factors.

Level of evidence

IV; therapeutic retrospective cohort.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
治疗 Legg-Calvé-Perthes 病的股骨近端外翻截骨术:年龄和侧柱分类对中短期临床和放射学结果有影响吗?
简介:股骨近端外翻截骨术(FVO)是治疗Legg-Calvé-Perthes病(LCPD)最常用的方法之一,疗效可接受。我们旨在研究发病年龄和侧柱分类对6-12岁LCPD患者股骨近端外翻截骨手术的临床和放射学疗效的影响:材料与方法:回顾性研究了50例接受FVO手术的LCPD患者(Herring B、B/C和C组)。我们评估了随访 37.3 ± 10.5 个月(范围:24 - 180 个月)的放射学(中心边缘角、挤压指数、骺指数、髋臼指数、关节-转子间距 (ATD))和临床(髋关节外展活动范围 (ROM)、Trendelenburg 征、疼痛和 Harris 髋关节评分 (HHS))结果。最后,采用Stulberg分类法评估了总体治疗效果:ROC曲线分析显示,年龄与临床或放射学结果之间没有明显关系,手术结果也没有可预测的年龄分界线(P=0.13)。外侧支柱B型、B/C型和C型患者随访时的Stulberg分级无明显差异(P>0.05):讨论:我们的研究结果表明,在LCPD患者的早期破碎期进行开刃近端FVO手术,可在3年随访中获得可接受的临床和影像学结果。我们研究的每个样本都非常小,测量的变量也很多,因此这一结果不足以得出有力的结论。不过,对于处于早期破碎期的患者,FVO手术仍是一个可行的建议,年龄和侧柱类型可能不是限制因素:IV级;治疗性回顾性队列。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
26.10%
发文量
329
审稿时长
12.5 weeks
期刊介绍: Orthopaedics & Traumatology: Surgery & Research (OTSR) publishes original scientific work in English related to all domains of orthopaedics. Original articles, Reviews, Technical notes and Concise follow-up of a former OTSR study are published in English in electronic form only and indexed in the main international databases.
期刊最新文献
Continuous improvement of patient experience in primary hip and knee arthroplasty through periodic satisfaction assessment: A quality improvement study in a private orthopedic hospital. Adoption and Perception of Artificial Intelligence by Corresponding Authors in Orthopaedic Research: A Global Cross-Sectional Study. Arthroscopic arthrolysis with hardware removal versus hardware removal alone after intra-articular distal radius fracture: A prospective comparative study. Evaluation of a new decision tree in acetabular fracture adapted to recent evolutions: a retrospective, monocentric observational study before/after. Computed tomography-based predictors of ulnar-sided complications after distal radius fracture fixation.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1