Outcome Trajectories after Intracerebral Hemorrhage.

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q3 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Seminars in Neurology Pub Date : 2024-06-01 Epub Date: 2024-05-24 DOI:10.1055/s-0044-1787104
Lourdes Carhuapoma, Santosh Murthy, Vishank A Shah
{"title":"Outcome Trajectories after Intracerebral Hemorrhage.","authors":"Lourdes Carhuapoma, Santosh Murthy, Vishank A Shah","doi":"10.1055/s-0044-1787104","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) is the most morbid of all stroke types with a high early mortality and significant early disability burden. Traditionally, outcome assessments after ICH have mirrored those of acute ischemic stroke, with 3 months post-ICH being considered a standard time point in most clinical trials, observational studies, and clinical practice. At this time point, the majority of ICH survivors remain with moderate to severe functional disability. However, emerging data suggest that recovery after ICH occurs over a more protracted course and requires longer periods of follow-up, with more than 40% of ICH survivors with initial severe disability improving to partial or complete functional independence over 1 year. Multiple other domains of recovery impact ICH survivors including cognition, mood, and health-related quality of life, all of which remain under studied in ICH. To further complicate the picture, the most important driver of mortality after ICH is early withdrawal of life-sustaining therapies, before initiation of treatment and evaluating effects of prolonged supportive care, influenced by early pessimistic prognostication based on baseline severity factors and prognostication biases. Thus, our understanding of the true natural history of ICH recovery remains limited. This review summarizes the existing literature on outcome trajectories in functional and nonfunctional domains, describes limitations in current prognostication practices, and highlights areas of uncertainty that warrant further research.</p>","PeriodicalId":49544,"journal":{"name":"Seminars in Neurology","volume":" ","pages":"298-307"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Seminars in Neurology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0044-1787104","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/5/24 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) is the most morbid of all stroke types with a high early mortality and significant early disability burden. Traditionally, outcome assessments after ICH have mirrored those of acute ischemic stroke, with 3 months post-ICH being considered a standard time point in most clinical trials, observational studies, and clinical practice. At this time point, the majority of ICH survivors remain with moderate to severe functional disability. However, emerging data suggest that recovery after ICH occurs over a more protracted course and requires longer periods of follow-up, with more than 40% of ICH survivors with initial severe disability improving to partial or complete functional independence over 1 year. Multiple other domains of recovery impact ICH survivors including cognition, mood, and health-related quality of life, all of which remain under studied in ICH. To further complicate the picture, the most important driver of mortality after ICH is early withdrawal of life-sustaining therapies, before initiation of treatment and evaluating effects of prolonged supportive care, influenced by early pessimistic prognostication based on baseline severity factors and prognostication biases. Thus, our understanding of the true natural history of ICH recovery remains limited. This review summarizes the existing literature on outcome trajectories in functional and nonfunctional domains, describes limitations in current prognostication practices, and highlights areas of uncertainty that warrant further research.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
脑出血后的预后轨迹
自发性脑内出血(ICH)是所有卒中类型中发病率最高的一种,早期死亡率高,早期致残率高。传统上,ICH 后的预后评估与急性缺血性卒中相同,大多数临床试验、观察性研究和临床实践都将 ICH 后 3 个月作为标准时间点。此时,大多数 ICH 幸存者仍有中度至重度功能障碍。然而,新出现的数据表明,ICH 后的恢复过程更为漫长,需要更长时间的随访,最初有严重残疾的 ICH 幸存者中有 40% 以上在 1 年内恢复到部分或完全的功能独立。影响 ICH 幸存者康复的其他多个方面包括认知、情绪和与健康相关的生活质量,但所有这些方面对 ICH 的研究仍然不足。使情况更加复杂的是,导致 ICH 后死亡的最重要因素是在开始治疗和评估长期支持性护理效果之前,过早停用维持生命的疗法,这受到基于基线严重程度因素和预后偏差的早期悲观预后的影响。因此,我们对 ICH 恢复的真实自然史的了解仍然有限。本综述总结了有关功能和非功能领域结果轨迹的现有文献,描述了当前预后实践中的局限性,并强调了需要进一步研究的不确定领域。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Seminars in Neurology
Seminars in Neurology 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
3.70%
发文量
65
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Seminars in Neurology is a review journal on current trends in the evaluation, diagnosis, and treatment of neurological diseases. Areas of coverage include multiple sclerosis, central nervous system infections, muscular dystrophy, neuro-immunology, spinal disorders, strokes, epilepsy, motor neuron diseases, movement disorders, higher cortical function, neuro-genetics and neuro-ophthamology. Each issue is presented under the direction of an expert guest editor, and invited contributors focus on a single, high-interest clinical topic. Up-to-the-minute coverage of the latest information in the field makes this journal an invaluable resource for neurologists and residents.
期刊最新文献
Altered Mental Status at the Extreme: Behavioral Evaluation of Disorders of Consciousness. Altered Mental Status in Cancer. The Approach to Altered Mental Status in the Intensive Care Unit. Approach to Altered Mental Status in Pregnancy and Postpartum. Altered Mental Status in the Solid-Organ Transplant Recipient.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1