Haoye Wang;Zhipeng Gao;Xing Hu;David Lo;John Grundy;Xinyu Wang
{"title":"Just-In-Time TODO-Missed Commits Detection","authors":"Haoye Wang;Zhipeng Gao;Xing Hu;David Lo;John Grundy;Xinyu Wang","doi":"10.1109/TSE.2024.3405005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"TODO comments play an important role in helping developers to manage their tasks and communicate with other team members. TODO comments are often introduced by developers as a type of technical debt, such as a reminder to add/remove features or a request to optimize the code implementations. These can all be considered as notifications for developers to revisit regarding the current suboptimal solutions. TODO comments often bring short-term benefits – higher productivity or shorter development cost – and indicate attention needs to be paid for the long-term software quality. Unfortunately, due to their lack of knowledge or experience and/or the time constraints, developers sometimes may forget or even not be aware of suboptimal implementations. The loss of the TODO comments for these suboptimal solutions may hurt the software quality and reliability in the long-term. Therefore it is beneficial to remind the developers of the suboptimal solutions whenever they change the code. In this work, we refer this problem to the task of detecting \n<italic>TODO-missed commits</i>\n, and we propose a novel approach named \n<sc>TDReminder</small>\n (\n<bold>T</b>\nO\n<bold>D</b>\nO comment \n<bold>Reminder</b>\n) to address the task. With the help of \n<sc>TDReminder</small>\n, developers can identify possible missing TODO commits just-in-time when submitting a commit. Our approach has two phases: offline training and online inference. We first embed code change and commit message into contextual vector representations using two neural encoders respectively. The association between these representations is learned by our model automatically. In the online inference phase, \n<sc>TDReminder</small>\n leverages the trained model to compute the likelihood of a commit being a \n<italic>TODO-missed commit</i>\n. We evaluate \n<sc>TDReminder</small>\n on datasets crawled from 10k popular Python and Java repositories in GitHub respectively. Our experimental results show that \n<sc>TDReminder</small>\n outperforms a set of benchmarks by a large margin in \n<italic>TODO-missed commits</i>\n detection. Moreover, to better help developers use \n<sc>TDReminder</small>\n in practice, we have incorporated Large Language Models (LLMs) with our approach to provide explainable recommendations. The user study shows that our tool can effectively inform developers not only “when” to add TODOs, but also “where” and “what” TODOs should be added, verifying the value of our tool in practical application.","PeriodicalId":13324,"journal":{"name":"IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering","volume":"50 11","pages":"2732-2752"},"PeriodicalIF":5.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/10538301/","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, SOFTWARE ENGINEERING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
TODO comments play an important role in helping developers to manage their tasks and communicate with other team members. TODO comments are often introduced by developers as a type of technical debt, such as a reminder to add/remove features or a request to optimize the code implementations. These can all be considered as notifications for developers to revisit regarding the current suboptimal solutions. TODO comments often bring short-term benefits – higher productivity or shorter development cost – and indicate attention needs to be paid for the long-term software quality. Unfortunately, due to their lack of knowledge or experience and/or the time constraints, developers sometimes may forget or even not be aware of suboptimal implementations. The loss of the TODO comments for these suboptimal solutions may hurt the software quality and reliability in the long-term. Therefore it is beneficial to remind the developers of the suboptimal solutions whenever they change the code. In this work, we refer this problem to the task of detecting
TODO-missed commits
, and we propose a novel approach named
TDReminder
(
T
O
D
O comment
Reminder
) to address the task. With the help of
TDReminder
, developers can identify possible missing TODO commits just-in-time when submitting a commit. Our approach has two phases: offline training and online inference. We first embed code change and commit message into contextual vector representations using two neural encoders respectively. The association between these representations is learned by our model automatically. In the online inference phase,
TDReminder
leverages the trained model to compute the likelihood of a commit being a
TODO-missed commit
. We evaluate
TDReminder
on datasets crawled from 10k popular Python and Java repositories in GitHub respectively. Our experimental results show that
TDReminder
outperforms a set of benchmarks by a large margin in
TODO-missed commits
detection. Moreover, to better help developers use
TDReminder
in practice, we have incorporated Large Language Models (LLMs) with our approach to provide explainable recommendations. The user study shows that our tool can effectively inform developers not only “when” to add TODOs, but also “where” and “what” TODOs should be added, verifying the value of our tool in practical application.
期刊介绍:
IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering seeks contributions comprising well-defined theoretical results and empirical studies with potential impacts on software construction, analysis, or management. The scope of this Transactions extends from fundamental mechanisms to the development of principles and their application in specific environments. Specific topic areas include:
a) Development and maintenance methods and models: Techniques and principles for specifying, designing, and implementing software systems, encompassing notations and process models.
b) Assessment methods: Software tests, validation, reliability models, test and diagnosis procedures, software redundancy, design for error control, and measurements and evaluation of process and product aspects.
c) Software project management: Productivity factors, cost models, schedule and organizational issues, and standards.
d) Tools and environments: Specific tools, integrated tool environments, associated architectures, databases, and parallel and distributed processing issues.
e) System issues: Hardware-software trade-offs.
f) State-of-the-art surveys: Syntheses and comprehensive reviews of the historical development within specific areas of interest.