Start with muscle mass or muscle strength in diagnosis and management of sarcopenia? A systematic review of guidance documents.

IF 1.3 4区 医学 Q4 NUTRITION & DIETETICS Asia Pacific journal of clinical nutrition Pub Date : 2024-06-01 DOI:10.6133/apjcn.202406_33(2).0011
Yu Zhang, Jia-Yu Guo, Fang Wang, Chun-Wei Li, Kang Yu
{"title":"Start with muscle mass or muscle strength in diagnosis and management of sarcopenia? A systematic review of guidance documents.","authors":"Yu Zhang, Jia-Yu Guo, Fang Wang, Chun-Wei Li, Kang Yu","doi":"10.6133/apjcn.202406_33(2).0011","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>Sarcopenia has garnered extensive attention in clinical practice since its high prevalence and significant impact on clinical outcomes. Multiple organizations have published guidance documents on sarcopenia, offering evidence-based recommendations for clinical practice and/or research. We aimed to appraise the methodological quality of the included documents and synthesize available recommendations for the screening, diagnosis, and intervention of sarcopenia.</p><p><strong>Methods and study design: </strong>We conducted a search on PubMed, Embase, Scopus, Cochrane Library, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, guideline database, and guideline organizations and professional societies websites for clinical practices, consensus statements and position papers in terms of sarcopenia, muscle atrophy or muscle loss published before April 17, 2023. The AGREE II instrument was used by three independent reviewers to assess the methodological quality of these documents.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Thirty-six guidance documents published between 2010 and 2023 were included. Seven documents fulfilled ≥ 50% of all the AGREE II domains. Seven underwent a Delphi process and six graded the strength of the recommendations. The process of screening (n=21), early diagnosis of sarcopenia (n=12), diagnosis of sarcopenia and severe sarcopenia (n=10), and management (n=21) were increasingly recommended. SARC-F (n=14) was the most recommended screening tool, and the assessment of muscle function was considered the first step in diagnosing sarcopenia. The management strategy for both age-related and disease-related sarcopenia mainly focused on exercise and nutrition intervention.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The guidance documents have provided referential recommendations that have great guiding significance. But the inconsistency in recommendations and variation in methodological rigour suggests that high-quality evidence is lacking yet.</p>","PeriodicalId":8486,"journal":{"name":"Asia Pacific journal of clinical nutrition","volume":"33 2","pages":"247-271"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11170015/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asia Pacific journal of clinical nutrition","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.6133/apjcn.202406_33(2).0011","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"NUTRITION & DIETETICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and objectives: Sarcopenia has garnered extensive attention in clinical practice since its high prevalence and significant impact on clinical outcomes. Multiple organizations have published guidance documents on sarcopenia, offering evidence-based recommendations for clinical practice and/or research. We aimed to appraise the methodological quality of the included documents and synthesize available recommendations for the screening, diagnosis, and intervention of sarcopenia.

Methods and study design: We conducted a search on PubMed, Embase, Scopus, Cochrane Library, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, guideline database, and guideline organizations and professional societies websites for clinical practices, consensus statements and position papers in terms of sarcopenia, muscle atrophy or muscle loss published before April 17, 2023. The AGREE II instrument was used by three independent reviewers to assess the methodological quality of these documents.

Results: Thirty-six guidance documents published between 2010 and 2023 were included. Seven documents fulfilled ≥ 50% of all the AGREE II domains. Seven underwent a Delphi process and six graded the strength of the recommendations. The process of screening (n=21), early diagnosis of sarcopenia (n=12), diagnosis of sarcopenia and severe sarcopenia (n=10), and management (n=21) were increasingly recommended. SARC-F (n=14) was the most recommended screening tool, and the assessment of muscle function was considered the first step in diagnosing sarcopenia. The management strategy for both age-related and disease-related sarcopenia mainly focused on exercise and nutrition intervention.

Conclusions: The guidance documents have provided referential recommendations that have great guiding significance. But the inconsistency in recommendations and variation in methodological rigour suggests that high-quality evidence is lacking yet.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在诊断和管理肌肉疏松症时,从肌肉质量还是肌肉力量入手?指导文件的系统回顾。
背景与目的:肌肉疏松症发病率高,对临床结果有重大影响,因此在临床实践中受到广泛关注。多个组织已发布了有关肌肉疏松症的指导文件,为临床实践和/或研究提供了循证建议。我们旨在评估所收录文件的方法学质量,并综合现有的建议,以筛查、诊断和干预肌肉疏松症:我们在 PubMed、Embase、Scopus、Cochrane 图书馆、中国国家知识基础设施、指南数据库、指南组织和专业学会网站上检索了 2023 年 4 月 17 日之前发表的有关肌肉疏松症、肌肉萎缩或肌肉损失的临床实践、共识声明和立场文件。三位独立评审员使用 AGREE II 工具评估这些文件的方法质量:结果:共纳入了 36 份 2010 年至 2023 年间发布的指导文件。有七份文件符合 AGREE II 所有领域的要求≥50%。七份文件进行了德尔菲程序,六份文件对建议的强度进行了分级。筛查(21 人)、早期诊断肌肉疏松症(12 人)、诊断肌肉疏松症和严重肌肉疏松症(10 人)以及管理(21 人)的过程越来越受到推荐。SARC-F(14 人)是最受推荐的筛查工具,肌肉功能评估被认为是诊断肌肉疏松症的第一步。与年龄相关和与疾病相关的肌肉疏松症的管理策略主要集中在运动和营养干预上:指导文件提供了具有重要指导意义的参考建议。结论:指导文件提供的参考建议具有重要的指导意义,但建议的不一致性和方法的严谨性差异表明目前还缺乏高质量的证据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
7.70%
发文量
58
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The aims of the Asia Pacific Journal of Clinical Nutrition (APJCN) are to publish high quality clinical nutrition relevant research findings which can build the capacity of clinical nutritionists in the region and enhance the practice of human nutrition and related disciplines for health promotion and disease prevention. APJCN will publish original research reports, reviews, short communications and case reports. News, book reviews and other items will also be included. The acceptance criteria for all papers are the quality and originality of the research and its significance to our readership. Except where otherwise stated, manuscripts are peer-reviewed by at least two anonymous reviewers and the Editor. The Editorial Board reserves the right to refuse any material for publication and advises that authors should retain copies of submitted manuscripts and correspondence as material cannot be returned. Final acceptance or rejection rests with the Editorial Board
期刊最新文献
Nutritional therapy among adult patients with severe burns: A retrospective observational study. Resting energy expenditure in patients with liver cirrhosis: Indirect calorimetry vs. predictive equations. Risk or associated factors of wasting among under-five children in Bangladesh: A systematic review. The impact of tea consumption on the risk of depression: A Mendelian randomization and Bayesian weighting algorithm study. A nomogram for predicting nutritional risk before gastric cancer surgery.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1