Attitudes of autistic adults toward genetic testing for autism.

IF 1.9 4区 医学 Q3 GENETICS & HEREDITY Journal of Genetic Counseling Pub Date : 2024-05-25 DOI:10.1002/jgc4.1918
Tielle Gallion, Zachary J Williams, Maria Niarchou, Laura Duncan, Gillian Hooker, Kelly A Taylor
{"title":"Attitudes of autistic adults toward genetic testing for autism.","authors":"Tielle Gallion, Zachary J Williams, Maria Niarchou, Laura Duncan, Gillian Hooker, Kelly A Taylor","doi":"10.1002/jgc4.1918","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Genetic testing for autism has been a controversial topic within the autistic community. Opinions regarding the benefits, risks, and limitations of genetic testing often differ between autistic people, researchers, and healthcare providers. The present study sought to understand the beliefs, attitudes, and intentions to pursue genetic testing of autistic adults and compare perspectives of autistic people who have had genetic testing with those who have not. An international sample of 173 autistic adults (19 [11%] who had previously undergone autism-related genetic testing) completed an online survey with questions assessing beliefs, attitudes, and intentions to pursue genetic testing. Beliefs and attitudes about genetic testing varied widely across the sample. Autistic individuals who had received prior genetic testing had much more positive beliefs about autism-related genetic testing (d = 0.87, 95% CI [0.37, 1.36]) and attitudes toward genetic testing (d = 1.14, 95% CI [0.66, 1.61]) compared to those who had not received such testing, although there were no meaningful differences between those same groups regarding beliefs about genetic testing unrelated to autism (d = 0.02, 95% CI [-0.45, 0.49], p = 0.93). Intention to genetically test oneself or one's (hypothetical) children was also significantly predicted by autism-specific beliefs, attitudes, and prior genetic testing status. A large majority of the sample (78.6%) also agreed that autistic individuals would benefit from contact with a genetic counselor in certain situations. These findings suggest that the autistic community does not have a singular view of genetic testing, and for those Autistic individuals who are interested in pursuing genetic testing for themselves or a family member, genetic counselors have the potential to play a key role in clinical care.</p>","PeriodicalId":54829,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Genetic Counseling","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Genetic Counseling","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/jgc4.1918","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GENETICS & HEREDITY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Genetic testing for autism has been a controversial topic within the autistic community. Opinions regarding the benefits, risks, and limitations of genetic testing often differ between autistic people, researchers, and healthcare providers. The present study sought to understand the beliefs, attitudes, and intentions to pursue genetic testing of autistic adults and compare perspectives of autistic people who have had genetic testing with those who have not. An international sample of 173 autistic adults (19 [11%] who had previously undergone autism-related genetic testing) completed an online survey with questions assessing beliefs, attitudes, and intentions to pursue genetic testing. Beliefs and attitudes about genetic testing varied widely across the sample. Autistic individuals who had received prior genetic testing had much more positive beliefs about autism-related genetic testing (d = 0.87, 95% CI [0.37, 1.36]) and attitudes toward genetic testing (d = 1.14, 95% CI [0.66, 1.61]) compared to those who had not received such testing, although there were no meaningful differences between those same groups regarding beliefs about genetic testing unrelated to autism (d = 0.02, 95% CI [-0.45, 0.49], p = 0.93). Intention to genetically test oneself or one's (hypothetical) children was also significantly predicted by autism-specific beliefs, attitudes, and prior genetic testing status. A large majority of the sample (78.6%) also agreed that autistic individuals would benefit from contact with a genetic counselor in certain situations. These findings suggest that the autistic community does not have a singular view of genetic testing, and for those Autistic individuals who are interested in pursuing genetic testing for themselves or a family member, genetic counselors have the potential to play a key role in clinical care.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
自闭症成人对自闭症基因检测的态度。
自闭症基因检测一直是自闭症群体中颇具争议的话题。自闭症患者、研究人员和医疗服务提供者对基因检测的益处、风险和局限性往往看法不一。本研究试图了解成年自闭症患者进行基因检测的信念、态度和意向,并比较接受过基因检测和未接受过基因检测的自闭症患者的观点。173名成年自闭症患者(其中19人[11%]曾接受过与自闭症相关的基因检测)完成了一项在线调查,调查问题包括对基因检测的信念、态度和意向的评估。不同样本对基因检测的信念和态度差异很大。与未接受过基因检测的自闭症患者相比,曾接受过基因检测的自闭症患者对自闭症相关基因检测的信念(d = 0.87,95% CI [0.37,1.36])和对基因检测的态度(d = 1.14,95% CI [0.66,1.61])要积极得多,但在对与自闭症无关的基因检测的信念方面,这些群体之间没有明显差异(d = 0.02,95% CI [-0.45,0.49],p = 0.93)。自闭症特定信念、态度和先前的基因检测状况也对自己或(假设的)子女进行基因检测的意向有显著的预测作用。绝大多数样本(78.6%)也同意,自闭症患者在某些情况下与遗传咨询师接触会有好处。这些研究结果表明,自闭症群体对基因检测的看法并不单一,对于那些有兴趣为自己或家人进行基因检测的自闭症患者来说,基因顾问有可能在临床护理中发挥关键作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Genetic Counseling
Journal of Genetic Counseling GENETICS & HEREDITY-
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
26.30%
发文量
113
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Genetic Counseling (JOGC), published for the National Society of Genetic Counselors, is a timely, international forum addressing all aspects of the discipline and practice of genetic counseling. The journal focuses on the critical questions and problems that arise at the interface between rapidly advancing technological developments and the concerns of individuals and communities at genetic risk. The publication provides genetic counselors, other clinicians and health educators, laboratory geneticists, bioethicists, legal scholars, social scientists, and other researchers with a premier resource on genetic counseling topics in national, international, and cross-national contexts.
期刊最新文献
The current landscape of clinical exome and genome reanalysis in the U.S. A cross-sectional survey-based exploration of diversity in the admissions committees and student cohorts of genetic counseling programs over time. An analysis of direct-to-consumer genetic testing portals and their communication of health risk and test limitations. Patient perceptions of genetic counselors' role and emotional support needs in adults with Parkinson's disease Clinical genetic counselors' use of people‐ and identity‐first language in regard to patients' identification with disability
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1