A reflection on neolithization in the plains of Behshahr and Neka in Eastern Mazandaran, Iran

Pub Date : 2024-05-25 DOI:10.1016/j.ara.2024.100522
Seyyed Kamal Asadi Ojaei , Rahmat Abbasnejad Seresti , Christopher P. Thornton , Roger Matthews
{"title":"A reflection on neolithization in the plains of Behshahr and Neka in Eastern Mazandaran, Iran","authors":"Seyyed Kamal Asadi Ojaei ,&nbsp;Rahmat Abbasnejad Seresti ,&nbsp;Christopher P. Thornton ,&nbsp;Roger Matthews","doi":"10.1016/j.ara.2024.100522","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>About 70 years ago, C. S. Coon reported the sudden presence of domesticated animal species following a gap between the Mesolithic/Epi-Paleolithic and the Pre-Pottery Neolithic (PPN), based on data from excavations of the Hotu and Kamarband (Belt) Caves in the southeastern littoral of the Caspian Sea. Then, the first scientific step towards Neolithization studies in the region was taken by proposing a hypothesis that emphasized the import of Neolithic culture and domestication packages from the eastern wing of the Fertile Crescent, within the framework of diffusion theory. More recently, another hypothesis has been proposed that Neolithization in eastern Mazandaran is due to endogenous factors. These hypotheses were proposed despite serious weaknesses in both field studies and analyses. Lack of reliable evidence of domesticated species, inconsistency of paleo-climatology chronologies and data with archaeological periods, lack of subsistence and settlement data, problems of Mesolithic/Epi-Paleolithic to Neolithic chronology, and weaknesses in processing and analyses of archaeological data, are some of the problems in Neolithization studies in the region. The present paper intends to provide a proper analysis of the Neolithization studies in this region, and proposes the theory of low-level food production as a key component.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":0,"journal":{"name":"","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-05-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352226724000230","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

About 70 years ago, C. S. Coon reported the sudden presence of domesticated animal species following a gap between the Mesolithic/Epi-Paleolithic and the Pre-Pottery Neolithic (PPN), based on data from excavations of the Hotu and Kamarband (Belt) Caves in the southeastern littoral of the Caspian Sea. Then, the first scientific step towards Neolithization studies in the region was taken by proposing a hypothesis that emphasized the import of Neolithic culture and domestication packages from the eastern wing of the Fertile Crescent, within the framework of diffusion theory. More recently, another hypothesis has been proposed that Neolithization in eastern Mazandaran is due to endogenous factors. These hypotheses were proposed despite serious weaknesses in both field studies and analyses. Lack of reliable evidence of domesticated species, inconsistency of paleo-climatology chronologies and data with archaeological periods, lack of subsistence and settlement data, problems of Mesolithic/Epi-Paleolithic to Neolithic chronology, and weaknesses in processing and analyses of archaeological data, are some of the problems in Neolithization studies in the region. The present paper intends to provide a proper analysis of the Neolithization studies in this region, and proposes the theory of low-level food production as a key component.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
对伊朗东马赞达兰地区贝赫沙赫尔和内卡平原新石器化的思考
大约 70 年前,库恩(C. S. Coon)根据里海东南沿岸 Hotu 和 Kamarband(带状)洞穴的发掘数据,报告了在中石器时代/前旧石器时代和陶器前新石器时代(PPN)之间的空白时期突然出现的驯化动物物种。随后,在扩散理论的框架内,提出了强调从新月沃土东翼传入新石器时代文化和驯化包的假说,从而迈出了该地区新石器时代研究的科学第一步。最近,又有人提出了另一种假说,即马赞达兰东部的新石器时代是由内生因素造成的。尽管实地研究和分析都存在严重不足,但这些假说还是被提出来了。缺乏驯化物种的可靠证据、古气候年表和数据与考古时期不一致、缺乏生存和定居数据、中石器时代/前旧石器时代到新石器时代的年表问题以及考古数据处理和分析方面的不足,都是该地区新石器时代研究中存在的一些问题。本文旨在对该地区的新石器时代研究进行适当的分析,并提出了作为关键组成部分的低水平粮食生产理论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1