Core outcome Set for Cardio-oncology (COS-CO): development of a set of outcomes for the cardiovascular assessment and monitoring of cancer patients and survivors

IF 4.8 2区 医学 Q1 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS European Heart Journal - Quality of Care and Clinical Outcomes Pub Date : 2024-05-25 DOI:10.1093/ehjqcco/qcae038
B. Manderlier, B. von Kemp, K. Beeckman, B. Cosyns, K. Van den Bussche, Robyn A Clark, Jonathon Foote, Jeroen Hendriks, Sofie Gevaert, Marie Moonen, Petra Nijst, Julie De Bolle, M. Luchian, Marc Van der Hoogerstraete, Mathilde De Dobbeleer, Nancy De Laet, P. Thavendiranathan, B. Borregaard, Franck Thuny, J. Cautela, Stephane Ederhy, E. Venturini, Rudolf de Boer, Arco Teske, Yvonne Koop, Sebastian Szmit, Teresa López, Jose L Zamorano, Andrii Hema, Alexander Lyon
{"title":"Core outcome Set for Cardio-oncology (COS-CO): development of a set of outcomes for the cardiovascular assessment and monitoring of cancer patients and survivors","authors":"B. Manderlier, B. von Kemp, K. Beeckman, B. Cosyns, K. Van den Bussche, Robyn A Clark, Jonathon Foote, Jeroen Hendriks, Sofie Gevaert, Marie Moonen, Petra Nijst, Julie De Bolle, M. Luchian, Marc Van der Hoogerstraete, Mathilde De Dobbeleer, Nancy De Laet, P. Thavendiranathan, B. Borregaard, Franck Thuny, J. Cautela, Stephane Ederhy, E. Venturini, Rudolf de Boer, Arco Teske, Yvonne Koop, Sebastian Szmit, Teresa López, Jose L Zamorano, Andrii Hema, Alexander Lyon","doi":"10.1093/ehjqcco/qcae038","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n \n \n There is an increasing awareness of the evidence-based selection of outcomes to be measured in clinical trials and clinical practice. Currently, there is no core outcome set (COS) for cardio-oncology, which may hinder the (inter)national comparison of the effectiveness of research and the quality of cardio-oncology care. The aim of this study is to develop a standard and pragmatic patient-centred outcome set to assess and monitor cancer patients and survivors at risk of or with cardiovascular diseases.\n \n \n \n A list of outcome domains was generated through a review of registries and guidelines, and six patient interviews. The project team reviewed and refined the outcome domains prior to starting a two-round Delphi procedure conducted between January-June 2022. The panellists, including healthcare providers and researchers, were invited to rate the importance of the outcomes. 26 experts from 11 countries rated a list of 93 outcomes (round 1) and 63 outcomes (round 2) to gain consensus on a list of outcome measures, and of demographic factors, health status and treatment variables. The final COS includes 15 outcome measures, reflecting four core areas: life impact (n = 2), pathophysiological manifestations (n = 9), resource use/economic impact (n = 1), and mortality/survival (n = 3). Next, six demographic factors, 21 health status, three cardiovascular and nine cancer variables were included.\n \n \n \n This is the first international development of a COS for cardio-oncology. This set aims to facilitate (inter)national comparison in cardio-oncology care, using standardised parameters and meaningful patient-centred outcomes for research and quality of care assessments.\n","PeriodicalId":11869,"journal":{"name":"European Heart Journal - Quality of Care and Clinical Outcomes","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Heart Journal - Quality of Care and Clinical Outcomes","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/ehjqcco/qcae038","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

There is an increasing awareness of the evidence-based selection of outcomes to be measured in clinical trials and clinical practice. Currently, there is no core outcome set (COS) for cardio-oncology, which may hinder the (inter)national comparison of the effectiveness of research and the quality of cardio-oncology care. The aim of this study is to develop a standard and pragmatic patient-centred outcome set to assess and monitor cancer patients and survivors at risk of or with cardiovascular diseases. A list of outcome domains was generated through a review of registries and guidelines, and six patient interviews. The project team reviewed and refined the outcome domains prior to starting a two-round Delphi procedure conducted between January-June 2022. The panellists, including healthcare providers and researchers, were invited to rate the importance of the outcomes. 26 experts from 11 countries rated a list of 93 outcomes (round 1) and 63 outcomes (round 2) to gain consensus on a list of outcome measures, and of demographic factors, health status and treatment variables. The final COS includes 15 outcome measures, reflecting four core areas: life impact (n = 2), pathophysiological manifestations (n = 9), resource use/economic impact (n = 1), and mortality/survival (n = 3). Next, six demographic factors, 21 health status, three cardiovascular and nine cancer variables were included. This is the first international development of a COS for cardio-oncology. This set aims to facilitate (inter)national comparison in cardio-oncology care, using standardised parameters and meaningful patient-centred outcomes for research and quality of care assessments.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
心血管肿瘤学核心结果集(COS-CO):为癌症患者和幸存者的心血管评估和监测制定一套结果集
人们越来越意识到,在临床试验和临床实践中应以证据为基础选择测量结果。目前,还没有一套针对心外科肿瘤学的核心结果集(COS),这可能会阻碍各国对心外科肿瘤学研究的有效性和治疗质量进行比较。本研究的目的是制定一套以患者为中心的标准实用结果,用于评估和监测有心血管疾病风险或患有心血管疾病的癌症患者和幸存者。 通过对登记册和指南的审查,以及对六位患者的访谈,得出了一份结果领域清单。项目小组在 2022 年 1 月至 6 月期间进行了两轮德尔菲程序,在此之前对结果域进行了审查和完善。小组成员(包括医疗服务提供者和研究人员)受邀对结果的重要性进行评分。来自 11 个国家的 26 位专家对 93 项结果(第 1 轮)和 63 项结果(第 2 轮)进行了评分,以就结果测量指标清单以及人口统计因素、健康状况和治疗变量达成共识。最终的 COS 包括 15 项结果测量,反映了四个核心领域:生活影响(n = 2)、病理生理表现(n = 9)、资源使用/经济影响(n = 1)和死亡率/存活率(n = 3)。此外,还包括 6 个人口统计因素、21 个健康状况、3 个心血管变量和 9 个癌症变量。 这是国际上首次为心血管肿瘤学开发 COS。这套系统的目的是利用标准化的参数和以患者为中心的有意义的结果,为研究和医疗质量评估提供便利,从而促进心外科肿瘤治疗的(国家间)比较。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.40
自引率
3.80%
发文量
76
期刊介绍: European Heart Journal - Quality of Care & Clinical Outcomes is an English language, peer-reviewed journal dedicated to publishing cardiovascular outcomes research. It serves as an official journal of the European Society of Cardiology and maintains a close alliance with the European Heart Health Institute. The journal disseminates original research and topical reviews contributed by health scientists globally, with a focus on the quality of care and its impact on cardiovascular outcomes at the hospital, national, and international levels. It provides a platform for presenting the most outstanding cardiovascular outcomes research to influence cardiovascular public health policy on a global scale. Additionally, the journal aims to motivate young investigators and foster the growth of the outcomes research community.
期刊最新文献
Clinicoeconomic burden among heart failure patients with severely reduced ejection fraction after hospital admission: HF-RESTORE. Trends and risk factors analysis of aortic aneurysm mortality in China over thirty years: based on the global burden of disease 2019 data. Cost-effectiveness of a novel AI technology to quantify coronary inflammation and cardiovascular risk in patients undergoing routine Coronary Computed Tomography Angiography. Regional disparities in heart transplant mortality in the United States. Bacteremia and infective endocarditis following left-sided heart valve surgery.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1