Aromatherapy for the prevention of postoperative nausea and vomiting: A systematic review and meta-analysis

IF 17.7 1区 化学 Q1 CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Accounts of Chemical Research Pub Date : 2024-05-24 DOI:10.4103/tcmj.tcmj_240_23
Jian-Ying Wang, Hsueh-Yang Huang, Wan-O Chu, Tzu-Rong Peng, Ming-Chia Lee, Shih-Ming Chen, Jen-Ai Lee
{"title":"Aromatherapy for the prevention of postoperative nausea and vomiting: A systematic review and meta-analysis","authors":"Jian-Ying Wang, Hsueh-Yang Huang, Wan-O Chu, Tzu-Rong Peng, Ming-Chia Lee, Shih-Ming Chen, Jen-Ai Lee","doi":"10.4103/tcmj.tcmj_240_23","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT\n \n \n \n Postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) are common complications following surgical procedures. While drug-based treatments are standard, there is increasing interest in nonpharmacological alternatives, such as aromatherapy, due to potential benefits and minimal side effects. This study aimed to assess the effectiveness of aromatherapy in preventing PONV.\n \n \n \n A comprehensive systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted using PubMed, Cochrane Library, EMBASE, and CINAHL databases for studies published up to May 2023. The included studies were randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and nonrandomized studies of interventions that examined the impact of aromatherapy on PONV. The risk of bias was assessed, and the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluations (GRADE) approach was employed to evaluate the certainty of the evidence.\n \n \n \n Eleven studies were selected for review, with eight RCTs included in the meta-analysis. Aromatherapy effectively reduced postoperative nausea severity (standardized mean difference [SMD]: −0.93, 95% confidence interval [CI]: −1.64 to −0.22; P = 0.010), but the reduction in vomiting episodes was not statistically significant (SMD: −0.81, 95% CI: −1.98-0.37; P = 0.180). Subgroup analysis indicated that ginger essence, lavender, and peppermint oils were particularly effective in managing postoperative nausea. However, due to significant statistical heterogeneity and potential biases in the studies, the results should be interpreted with caution. The certainty of the evidence, as evaluated by the GRADE approach, was low.\n \n \n \n Preliminary evidence supports the potential benefit of aromatherapy in reducing the severity of postoperative nausea. However, given the low certainty of current evidence, more rigorous and standardized research is needed. The safety, affordability, and potential benefits to patient comfort make aromatherapy a promising area for further research in postoperative care.\n","PeriodicalId":1,"journal":{"name":"Accounts of Chemical Research","volume":"7 11","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":17.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Accounts of Chemical Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/tcmj.tcmj_240_23","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ABSTRACT Postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) are common complications following surgical procedures. While drug-based treatments are standard, there is increasing interest in nonpharmacological alternatives, such as aromatherapy, due to potential benefits and minimal side effects. This study aimed to assess the effectiveness of aromatherapy in preventing PONV. A comprehensive systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted using PubMed, Cochrane Library, EMBASE, and CINAHL databases for studies published up to May 2023. The included studies were randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and nonrandomized studies of interventions that examined the impact of aromatherapy on PONV. The risk of bias was assessed, and the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluations (GRADE) approach was employed to evaluate the certainty of the evidence. Eleven studies were selected for review, with eight RCTs included in the meta-analysis. Aromatherapy effectively reduced postoperative nausea severity (standardized mean difference [SMD]: −0.93, 95% confidence interval [CI]: −1.64 to −0.22; P = 0.010), but the reduction in vomiting episodes was not statistically significant (SMD: −0.81, 95% CI: −1.98-0.37; P = 0.180). Subgroup analysis indicated that ginger essence, lavender, and peppermint oils were particularly effective in managing postoperative nausea. However, due to significant statistical heterogeneity and potential biases in the studies, the results should be interpreted with caution. The certainty of the evidence, as evaluated by the GRADE approach, was low. Preliminary evidence supports the potential benefit of aromatherapy in reducing the severity of postoperative nausea. However, given the low certainty of current evidence, more rigorous and standardized research is needed. The safety, affordability, and potential benefits to patient comfort make aromatherapy a promising area for further research in postoperative care.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
预防术后恶心和呕吐的芳香疗法:系统回顾与荟萃分析
摘要 术后恶心和呕吐(PONV)是外科手术后常见的并发症。虽然以药物为基础的治疗是标准疗法,但由于芳香疗法等非药物疗法具有潜在的益处和最小的副作用,越来越多的人对其产生了兴趣。本研究旨在评估芳香疗法在预防 PONV 方面的有效性。 我们使用 PubMed、Cochrane Library、EMBASE 和 CINAHL 数据库对截至 2023 年 5 月发表的研究进行了全面的系统综述和荟萃分析。纳入的研究包括随机对照试验(RCT)和非随机干预研究,这些研究均探讨了芳香疗法对 PONV 的影响。对偏倚风险进行了评估,并采用建议、评估、发展和评价分级法(GRADE)对证据的确定性进行了评估。 共选择了 11 项研究进行审查,其中 8 项 RCT 纳入了荟萃分析。芳香疗法有效降低了术后恶心的严重程度(标准化平均差 [SMD]:-0.93,95% 置信区间 [CI]:-0.93,95% 置信区间[CI]:-1.64 至 -0.22;P = 0.010),但呕吐次数的减少并无统计学意义(SMD:-0.81,95% 置信区间[CI]:-1.98 至 0.37;P = 0.180)。亚组分析表明,生姜精油、薰衣草精油和薄荷精油对控制术后恶心特别有效。然而,由于研究中存在明显的统计异质性和潜在偏差,因此在解释结果时应谨慎。根据 GRADE 方法评估,证据的确定性较低。 初步证据支持芳香疗法在降低术后恶心严重程度方面的潜在益处。不过,鉴于目前证据的确定性较低,因此需要进行更严格和标准化的研究。芳香疗法的安全性、经济性和对患者舒适度的潜在益处使其成为术后护理中一个很有前景的进一步研究领域。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Accounts of Chemical Research
Accounts of Chemical Research 化学-化学综合
CiteScore
31.40
自引率
1.10%
发文量
312
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Accounts of Chemical Research presents short, concise and critical articles offering easy-to-read overviews of basic research and applications in all areas of chemistry and biochemistry. These short reviews focus on research from the author’s own laboratory and are designed to teach the reader about a research project. In addition, Accounts of Chemical Research publishes commentaries that give an informed opinion on a current research problem. Special Issues online are devoted to a single topic of unusual activity and significance. Accounts of Chemical Research replaces the traditional article abstract with an article "Conspectus." These entries synopsize the research affording the reader a closer look at the content and significance of an article. Through this provision of a more detailed description of the article contents, the Conspectus enhances the article's discoverability by search engines and the exposure for the research.
期刊最新文献
The Stability of Organic Field-Effect Transistors: From Materials, Devices to Circuits S-Scheme Shapes Heterojunction Photocatalysis Ni-Catalyzed Asymmetric Alkyl–Alkyl Cross-Coupling: Reaction Mode Development and Applications Microheterogeneous Electrolytes: From Chemical Composition to Spatial Architecture─A Paradigm Shift in Electrolyte and Interphase Design From Upconversion Nanoparticles to Proteins: Probing Hydration-Water Density Fluctuations by Luminescence Thermometry.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1