Redistribution and selfishness

IF 1.1 1区 哲学 0 PHILOSOPHY ANALYSIS Pub Date : 2024-05-24 DOI:10.1093/analys/anae001
Harry R Lloyd
{"title":"Redistribution and selfishness","authors":"Harry R Lloyd","doi":"10.1093/analys/anae001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n One of the disadvantages of redistributive taxation is that it reduces people’s financial incentives to increase national wealth and benefit others by engaging in productive activities. It is natural to suppose that the severity of this disadvantage will be proportional to the socially prevailing level of human selfishness. Thus several advocates of redistribution (G.A. Cohen, Ha-Joon Chang among others) have argued that this disadvantage of redistribution need not be as severe as critics often suggest, because human beings need not be so selfish. My aim in this paper is to argue that, even in a society entirely composed of unselfish and impartially beneficent individuals, redistributive taxation would still discourage activities that contribute to national wealth, because differing individuals have different views about what counts as benefiting themselves and others. I also relate my discussion to G.A. Cohen’s influential ‘camping trip’ argument for socialism (from Why Not Socialism?).","PeriodicalId":47773,"journal":{"name":"ANALYSIS","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ANALYSIS","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/analys/anae001","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"PHILOSOPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

One of the disadvantages of redistributive taxation is that it reduces people’s financial incentives to increase national wealth and benefit others by engaging in productive activities. It is natural to suppose that the severity of this disadvantage will be proportional to the socially prevailing level of human selfishness. Thus several advocates of redistribution (G.A. Cohen, Ha-Joon Chang among others) have argued that this disadvantage of redistribution need not be as severe as critics often suggest, because human beings need not be so selfish. My aim in this paper is to argue that, even in a society entirely composed of unselfish and impartially beneficent individuals, redistributive taxation would still discourage activities that contribute to national wealth, because differing individuals have different views about what counts as benefiting themselves and others. I also relate my discussion to G.A. Cohen’s influential ‘camping trip’ argument for socialism (from Why Not Socialism?).
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
再分配与自私自利
再分配税收的弊端之一是,它削弱了人们通过从事生产活动来增加国家财富和造福他人的经济动力。人们自然会认为,这种弊端的严重程度与社会上普遍存在的人类自私程度成正比。因此,一些再分配的倡导者(G.A. Cohen、Ha-Joon Chang 等人)认为,再分配的弊端并不像批评者经常说的那样严重,因为人类不需要那么自私。我在本文中的目的是要论证,即使在一个完全由大公无私、不偏不倚的个人组成的社会中,再分配税收仍然会阻碍那些为国家财富做出贡献的活动,因为不同的个人对于什么是有利于自己和他人的活动有着不同的看法。我还将我的讨论与科恩(G.A. Cohen)对社会主义颇具影响力的 "野营之旅 "论点联系起来(摘自《为什么不是社会主义?
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
ANALYSIS
ANALYSIS PHILOSOPHY-
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
12.50%
发文量
68
期刊介绍: Analysis is the most established and esteemed forum in which to publish short discussions of topics in philosophy. Articles published in Analysis lend themselves to the presentation of cogent but brief arguments for substantive conclusions, and often give rise to discussions which continue over several interchanges. A wide range of topics are covered including: philosophical logic and philosophy of language, metaphysics, epistemology, philosophy of mind, and moral philosophy.
期刊最新文献
A puzzle about weak belief On the dilemma for partial subjunctive supposition Fragility and strength Alan Author strikes again: more on confirming conjunctions of disconfirmed hypotheses Correction to: Primitive conditional probabilities, subset relations and comparative regularity
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1