Personality and quality-of-life improvement after apomorphine infusion in Parkinson’s disease

M. Boussac, Estelle Harroch, Christel Barthelemy, F. Ory-Magne, Clémence Leung, Margherita Fabbri, Christophe Arbus, Christine Brefel-Courbon
{"title":"Personality and quality-of-life improvement after apomorphine infusion in Parkinson’s disease","authors":"M. Boussac, Estelle Harroch, Christel Barthelemy, F. Ory-Magne, Clémence Leung, Margherita Fabbri, Christophe Arbus, Christine Brefel-Courbon","doi":"10.1093/braincomms/fcae181","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n People with Parkinson’s disease with motor fluctuations can be treated by Continuous Subcutaneous Apomorphine Infusion (CSAI) to reduce their symptoms. Nonetheless, factors are lacking to predict patients’ quality-of-life amelioration after CSAI. This pilot study aimed to evaluate associations between personality dimensions and quality-of-life improvement after six months of CSAI.\n Thirty-nine people with Parkinson’s disease awaiting CSAI were included. Linear regression models between “Temperament and Character Inventory” personality dimensions at baseline and percentage of change in PDQ-39 (Parkinson’s Disease Questionnaire-39) scores after six months of CSAI were realized (n = 35). Temperament and Character Inventory was also compared between patients awaiting CSAI and patients awaiting deep brain stimulation of the sub-thalamic nucleus (n = 39 from the PREDI-STIM study).\n Higher Reward Dependence scores were associated with a better quality-of-life outcome after six months of CSAI, while Self-Directedness scores were associated with a better quality of life before CSAI (as opposed to Harm Avoidance, Reward Dependence, and Self-Transcendence scores associated with a worse quality of life). Moreover, people with Parkinson’s disease awaiting deep brain stimulation of the sub-thalamic nucleus had similar Temperament and Character Inventory dimensions compared to patients awaiting CSAI.\n People with Parkinson’s disease with higher Reward Dependence scores at baseline had the best quality-of-life improvement after six months of CSAI. This finding could be used to better prepare and accompany people with Parkinson’s disease during CSAI establishment. Moreover, this result could serve as an orientation factor to second-line treatments.","PeriodicalId":9318,"journal":{"name":"Brain Communications","volume":"79 24","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Brain Communications","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/braincomms/fcae181","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

People with Parkinson’s disease with motor fluctuations can be treated by Continuous Subcutaneous Apomorphine Infusion (CSAI) to reduce their symptoms. Nonetheless, factors are lacking to predict patients’ quality-of-life amelioration after CSAI. This pilot study aimed to evaluate associations between personality dimensions and quality-of-life improvement after six months of CSAI. Thirty-nine people with Parkinson’s disease awaiting CSAI were included. Linear regression models between “Temperament and Character Inventory” personality dimensions at baseline and percentage of change in PDQ-39 (Parkinson’s Disease Questionnaire-39) scores after six months of CSAI were realized (n = 35). Temperament and Character Inventory was also compared between patients awaiting CSAI and patients awaiting deep brain stimulation of the sub-thalamic nucleus (n = 39 from the PREDI-STIM study). Higher Reward Dependence scores were associated with a better quality-of-life outcome after six months of CSAI, while Self-Directedness scores were associated with a better quality of life before CSAI (as opposed to Harm Avoidance, Reward Dependence, and Self-Transcendence scores associated with a worse quality of life). Moreover, people with Parkinson’s disease awaiting deep brain stimulation of the sub-thalamic nucleus had similar Temperament and Character Inventory dimensions compared to patients awaiting CSAI. People with Parkinson’s disease with higher Reward Dependence scores at baseline had the best quality-of-life improvement after six months of CSAI. This finding could be used to better prepare and accompany people with Parkinson’s disease during CSAI establishment. Moreover, this result could serve as an orientation factor to second-line treatments.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
帕金森病患者输注阿朴吗啡后性格和生活质量的改善
帕金森病患者如果出现运动波动,可以通过持续皮下注射阿朴吗啡(CSAI)来减轻症状。然而,目前还缺乏能预测患者在 CSAI 治疗后生活质量改善情况的因素。本试验研究旨在评估人格维度与 CSAI 六个月后生活质量改善之间的关联。研究纳入了 39 名等待 CSAI 的帕金森病患者。基线时的 "气质和性格量表 "人格维度与 CSAI 六个月后 PDQ-39(帕金森病问卷-39)得分变化百分比之间的线性回归模型得以实现(n = 35)。还对等待 CSAI 的患者和等待丘脑下核深部脑刺激的患者(PREDI-STIM 研究中的 39 人)的气质和性格量表进行了比较。较高的奖赏依赖性得分与CSAI六个月后较好的生活质量结果相关,而自我导向性得分与CSAI前较好的生活质量相关(相反,避免伤害、奖赏依赖性和自我超越性得分与较差的生活质量相关)。此外,等待丘脑下核深部脑刺激的帕金森病患者与等待CSAI的患者相比,具有相似的气质和性格量表维度。基线奖励依赖评分较高的帕金森病患者在接受CSAI治疗6个月后,生活质量改善得最好。这一发现可用于帕金森病患者在 CSAI 建立期间做好更好的准备和陪伴。此外,这一结果还可作为二线治疗的导向因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Dose-dependent LSD effects on cortical/thalamic and cerebellar activity: brain oxygen level-dependent fMRI study in awake rats Statin use and risk of Parkinson’s disease among older adults in Japan: a nested case-control study using the longevity improvement and fair evidence study Altered functional connectivity of the default mode network in non-arteritic anterior ischemic optic neuropathy Leveraging sex-genetic interactions to understand brain disorders: recent advances and current gaps Propionic acid promotes neurite recovery in damaged multiple sclerosis neurons
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1