P.149 Saskatchewan spine pathway classification is associated with post-operative outcome and improved quality-adjusted life years following lumbosacral fusion

B. Ridha, E. Liu, A. Persad, DR Fourney
{"title":"P.149 Saskatchewan spine pathway classification is associated with post-operative outcome and improved quality-adjusted life years following lumbosacral fusion","authors":"B. Ridha, E. Liu, A. Persad, DR Fourney","doi":"10.1017/cjn.2024.248","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Low back pain (LBP) is a common cause of disability and decreased quality of life. The Saskatchewan Spine Pathway classification (SSPc) is a method for triaging patients who are candidates for surgery. Methods: Consecutive patients who underwent lumbosacral instrumented fusion for degenerative spinal pathology from Jan 1, 2012, to Sept 20, 2018, by a single surgeon at our institution were retrospectively reviewed. Patients were stratified by SSPc into 4 groups based on pain pattern. Demographic and clinical data were collected. Outcomes were compared between cohorts both for absolute values and achieving MCID. Results: 169 consecutive patients were included in our study. After stratifying by SSPc grouping, there were 61 SSPc I patients, 45 SSPc III patients, and 63 SSPc IV patients. Patients in all groups had clinical improvement following surgery. Patients classified as SSPc III had superior outcomes in ODI, EQ-5D and EQ-VAS, and were more likely to achieve the MCID for ED-5D. Multivariate analysis demonstrated that SSPc grouping is an independent predictor of final VAS back, ODI, EQ-5D, and EQ-VAS as well as achieving the MCID for EQ-5D. Conclusions: The SSPc classification is associated with outcomes following lumbosacral fusion. In particular, patients with SSPc pattern 3 had better outcomes and improved QALY.","PeriodicalId":9571,"journal":{"name":"Canadian Journal of Neurological Sciences / Journal Canadien des Sciences Neurologiques","volume":"74 12","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Canadian Journal of Neurological Sciences / Journal Canadien des Sciences Neurologiques","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/cjn.2024.248","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Low back pain (LBP) is a common cause of disability and decreased quality of life. The Saskatchewan Spine Pathway classification (SSPc) is a method for triaging patients who are candidates for surgery. Methods: Consecutive patients who underwent lumbosacral instrumented fusion for degenerative spinal pathology from Jan 1, 2012, to Sept 20, 2018, by a single surgeon at our institution were retrospectively reviewed. Patients were stratified by SSPc into 4 groups based on pain pattern. Demographic and clinical data were collected. Outcomes were compared between cohorts both for absolute values and achieving MCID. Results: 169 consecutive patients were included in our study. After stratifying by SSPc grouping, there were 61 SSPc I patients, 45 SSPc III patients, and 63 SSPc IV patients. Patients in all groups had clinical improvement following surgery. Patients classified as SSPc III had superior outcomes in ODI, EQ-5D and EQ-VAS, and were more likely to achieve the MCID for ED-5D. Multivariate analysis demonstrated that SSPc grouping is an independent predictor of final VAS back, ODI, EQ-5D, and EQ-VAS as well as achieving the MCID for EQ-5D. Conclusions: The SSPc classification is associated with outcomes following lumbosacral fusion. In particular, patients with SSPc pattern 3 had better outcomes and improved QALY.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
P.149 萨斯喀彻温省脊柱路径分类与腰骶部融合术后疗效和提高质量调整生命年有关
背景:腰背痛(LBP)是导致残疾和生活质量下降的常见原因。萨斯喀彻温脊柱路径分类法(SSPc)是一种对适合手术治疗的患者进行分流的方法。方法:回顾性审查了 2012 年 1 月 1 日至 2018 年 9 月 20 日期间,由我院一名外科医生接受腰骶部器械融合术治疗脊柱退行性病变的连续患者。根据疼痛模式将患者按 SSPc 分为 4 组。收集了人口统计学和临床数据。比较了各组间的绝对值和达到 MCID 的结果。结果我们的研究共纳入了 169 名连续患者。按 SSPc 分组后,共有 61 名 SSPc I 患者、45 名 SSPc III 患者和 63 名 SSPc IV 患者。各组患者术后临床症状均有所改善。被归为 SSPc III 的患者在 ODI、EQ-5D 和 EQ-VAS 方面的疗效更佳,更有可能达到 ED-5D 的 MCID。多变量分析表明,SSPc 分组是最终 VAS 回归、ODI、EQ-5D 和 EQ-VAS 以及达到 EQ-5D MCID 的独立预测因素。结论SSPc 分级与腰骶部融合术后的疗效有关。尤其是 SSPc 模式 3 患者的疗效更好,QALY 也更高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
B.2 Time from symptom onset and number of health care encounters prior to diagnosis of cerebral venous thrombosis D.6 Neurological care and outcomes of pregnant patients with epilepsy in a Canadian tertiary care center (2014-2020) F.4 Anatomical assessment and comparative analysis of ventricular access points in pterional approach: a cadaveric study P.077 Reducing artifact during in bi-directional brain interfacing P.006 Barriers and risk factors for emergency room visits vs smartphone app use for migraine in Canada and the United States
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1