From Pen to Pixel

IF 2.3 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH CALICO Journal Pub Date : 2024-05-24 DOI:10.1558/cj.27104
Ramsey Cardwell, Ben Naismith, Jill Burstein, Steven Nydick, Sarah Goodwin, Anthony Verardi
{"title":"From Pen to Pixel","authors":"Ramsey Cardwell, Ben Naismith, Jill Burstein, Steven Nydick, Sarah Goodwin, Anthony Verardi","doi":"10.1558/cj.27104","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The use of digital technologies in higher education is continually increasing, leading to changes in language use and presumably altering the language skills needed for academic studies. However, scores from high-stakes English language proficiency (ELP) tests used in postsecondary admissions only ensure the prerequisite level of traditional English skills (reading, writing, listening, and speaking). Such tests generally do not directly assess technology-mediated language skills (e.g., using online dictionaries and communicating via text message) that likely facilitate successful degree completion for international students. We present results from a needs analysis survey to re-evaluate the English-medium postsecondary linguistic landscape (i.e., update the target language use domain description), to inform ELP admissions tests. We specifically investigate international student (n = 379) and disciplinary instructor (n = 427) perceptions of the importance and frequency of technology-mediated language skills. Results show that student and instructor responses differ on certain technology-mediated skills, such as typing on a smartphone, underscoring the need to consider diverse perspectives in domain analysis research. Findings may inform how digital ELP admissions tests are developed, and how English for academic purposes curricula are designed, in order to better align test/classroom tasks with the academic language skills postsecondary students need.","PeriodicalId":46819,"journal":{"name":"CALICO Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"CALICO Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1558/cj.27104","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The use of digital technologies in higher education is continually increasing, leading to changes in language use and presumably altering the language skills needed for academic studies. However, scores from high-stakes English language proficiency (ELP) tests used in postsecondary admissions only ensure the prerequisite level of traditional English skills (reading, writing, listening, and speaking). Such tests generally do not directly assess technology-mediated language skills (e.g., using online dictionaries and communicating via text message) that likely facilitate successful degree completion for international students. We present results from a needs analysis survey to re-evaluate the English-medium postsecondary linguistic landscape (i.e., update the target language use domain description), to inform ELP admissions tests. We specifically investigate international student (n = 379) and disciplinary instructor (n = 427) perceptions of the importance and frequency of technology-mediated language skills. Results show that student and instructor responses differ on certain technology-mediated skills, such as typing on a smartphone, underscoring the need to consider diverse perspectives in domain analysis research. Findings may inform how digital ELP admissions tests are developed, and how English for academic purposes curricula are designed, in order to better align test/classroom tasks with the academic language skills postsecondary students need.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
从笔到像素
数字技术在高等教育中的使用不断增加,导致语言使用的变化,并可能改变学术研究所需的语言技能。然而,中学后招生中使用的高风险英语语言能力(ELP)测试成绩只能确保传统英语技能(读、写、听、说)的必备水平。此类测试一般不直接评估以技术为媒介的语言技能(如使用在线词典和通过短信进行交流),而这些技能很可能有助于留学生顺利完成学位课程。我们介绍了一项需求分析调查的结果,该调查旨在重新评估以英语为媒介的中学后语言环境(即更新目标语言使用领域的描述),为英语语言教学法入学测试提供参考。我们特别调查了留学生(n = 379)和学科教师(n = 427)对以技术为媒介的语言技能的重要性和频率的看法。结果表明,学生和教师对某些以技术为媒介的技能(如在智能手机上打字)的反应有所不同,这强调了在领域分析研究中考虑不同观点的必要性。研究结果可为如何开发数字化英语语言教学法入学测试以及如何设计学术英语课程提供参考,以便更好地将测试/课堂任务与中学后学生所需的学术语言技能结合起来。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CALICO Journal
CALICO Journal EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
10.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
From Pen to Pixel Rocket Spanish Concgrams and Writing Quality in Test Compositions Structure and Engagement in Teacher–Student Chats in ESL Writing Hey Google, Let’s Write
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1