Medical care services interplay between individual and Medicaid managed care markets in expansion versus non‐expansion states

IF 1.1 Q3 BUSINESS, FINANCE Risk Management and Insurance Review Pub Date : 2024-05-23 DOI:10.1111/rmir.12278
Bo Shi, Etti G. Baranoff, T. Sager
{"title":"Medical care services interplay between individual and Medicaid managed care markets in expansion versus non‐expansion states","authors":"Bo Shi, Etti G. Baranoff, T. Sager","doi":"10.1111/rmir.12278","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We study enrollment, medical service utilization, and incurred expenses of individual comprehensive and Medicaid managed care plans in states with or without Medicaid expansion adopted at the Affordable Care Act (ACA) early stage 2014–2016. To make healthcare services more accessible, 27 states expanded Medicaid eligibility to cover nearly‐poor non‐elderly adults who have had incomes between 100% and 138% of federal poverty level in 2014. In non‐expansion states, early enrollees in this income cohort had to choose individual market plans rather than Medicaid. Early enrollees' enrollment choices and their health status have had a great impact on the individual market premiums and Medicaid spending. We examined health insurers' annual regulatory filings with the National Association of Insurance Commissioners for 2013–2016 and found that: First, individual comprehensive insurance enrollment grew much faster in states not expanding Medicaid eligibility. Second, after incorporating early enrollees, per member per month (PMPM) medical service utilization and expenses of individual comprehensive insurance grew much faster in non‐expansion states. Third, among major types of medical utilization and expense measures, PMPM hospital inpatient days and PMPM prescription drug expenses increased substantially since 2014. Finally, Medicaid beneficiaries generated more PMPM medical utilization and expenses in expansion states.","PeriodicalId":35338,"journal":{"name":"Risk Management and Insurance Review","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Risk Management and Insurance Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/rmir.12278","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BUSINESS, FINANCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

We study enrollment, medical service utilization, and incurred expenses of individual comprehensive and Medicaid managed care plans in states with or without Medicaid expansion adopted at the Affordable Care Act (ACA) early stage 2014–2016. To make healthcare services more accessible, 27 states expanded Medicaid eligibility to cover nearly‐poor non‐elderly adults who have had incomes between 100% and 138% of federal poverty level in 2014. In non‐expansion states, early enrollees in this income cohort had to choose individual market plans rather than Medicaid. Early enrollees' enrollment choices and their health status have had a great impact on the individual market premiums and Medicaid spending. We examined health insurers' annual regulatory filings with the National Association of Insurance Commissioners for 2013–2016 and found that: First, individual comprehensive insurance enrollment grew much faster in states not expanding Medicaid eligibility. Second, after incorporating early enrollees, per member per month (PMPM) medical service utilization and expenses of individual comprehensive insurance grew much faster in non‐expansion states. Third, among major types of medical utilization and expense measures, PMPM hospital inpatient days and PMPM prescription drug expenses increased substantially since 2014. Finally, Medicaid beneficiaries generated more PMPM medical utilization and expenses in expansion states.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
扩展州与非扩展州个人和医疗补助管理性护理市场之间医疗护理服务的相互作用
我们研究了在 2014-2016 年《平价医疗法案》(ACA)早期阶段通过或未通过医疗补助扩展的州的个人综合计划和医疗补助管理性护理计划的注册人数、医疗服务利用率和发生的费用。为了使人们更容易获得医疗保健服务,27 个州在 2014 年扩大了医疗补助资格,以覆盖收入在联邦贫困线 100%至 138% 之间的近乎贫困的非老年成年人。在未扩大范围的州,这一收入群体的早期参保者必须选择个人市场计划,而不是医疗补助计划。早期参保者的参保选择及其健康状况对个人市场保费和医疗补助支出有很大影响。我们研究了医疗保险公司在 2013-2016 年期间向全国保险专员协会提交的年度监管文件,发现了以下几点:首先,在未扩大医疗补助资格的州,个人综合保险参保人数增长更快。其次,在纳入早期参保者后,个人综合保险的月人均医疗服务利用率和支出在未扩大的州增长得更快。第三,自 2014 年以来,在主要类型的医疗利用率和费用衡量指标中,PMPM 住院天数和 PMPM 处方药费用大幅增加。最后,在扩展州,医疗补助受益人产生了更多的 PMPM 医疗使用和费用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Risk Management and Insurance Review
Risk Management and Insurance Review Economics, Econometrics and Finance-Finance
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
28
期刊介绍: Risk Management and Insurance Review publishes respected, accessible, and high-quality applied research, and well-reasoned opinion and discussion in the field of risk and insurance. The Review"s "Feature Articles" section includes original research involving applications and applied techniques. The "Perspectives" section contains articles providing new insights on the research literature, business practice, and public policy. The "Educational Insights" section provides a repository of high-caliber model lectures in risk and insurance, along with articles discussing and evaluating instructional techniques.
期刊最新文献
Determinants and value of corporate social responsibility management: Empirical evidence from the insurance industry Unaffordable, untrustworthy, or unnecessary? Reasons for foregoing building, home contents, and comprehensive car insurance in disaster‐prone Australia The impact of brokers on ACA marketplace growth Introduction: The ACA marketplace experience Medical care services interplay between individual and Medicaid managed care markets in expansion versus non‐expansion states
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1