Prediction of Optimum Dosage of Coagulant in Water Treatment Plant: A Comparative Study between Artificial Neural Network and Random Forest

Nitin T. Sawalkar, Sagar W. Jadhav, Alpita A. Pawar
{"title":"Prediction of Optimum Dosage of Coagulant in Water Treatment Plant: A Comparative Study between Artificial Neural Network and Random Forest","authors":"Nitin T. Sawalkar, Sagar W. Jadhav, Alpita A. Pawar","doi":"10.47392/irjaeh.2024.0194","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Raw water, sourced directly from natural water bodies, is unsuitable for direct consumption due to the presence of various impurities. Therefore, it undergoes treatment at a Water Treatment Plant (WTP) before being supplied to the public. Preliminary treatment involves the removal of floating matter, through screening, while heavier particles settle out by gravity, fine particles remain in suspension, causing turbidity. Effective removal of these suspended particles requires coagulation to form flocs and facilitate the settling. Determining the optimal coagulant dosage is crucial, as both underdoing and overdosing of coagulant can lead to ineffective treatment and increased costs. Conventionally optimum dosage of coagulant is determined by performing jar test. This study focuses on predicting the optimum coagulant dosage using two soft computing techniques: Artificial Neural Network (ANN) and Random Forest (RF). The Input parameters for model development include turbidity, pH, temperature, and alkalinity of raw water from the Parvati Water Treatment Plant, Pune. In this study Four models were developed, namely Model A (Turbidity), Model B (pH, Alkalinity, Temperature, Turbidity), Model C (pH, Alkalinity, Temperature), and Model D (Alkalinity and Turbidity). These models were trained using ANN and RF. Predictions of optimum coagulant doses were made for the testing dataset, and model accuracy was evaluated using Scatter plots, Root Mean Squared Error (RMSE) and Coefficient of Correlation (R). Results indicate that RMSE values of ANN Models are comparatively lower than RF. Comparing among Models A, B, C, and D, Model B and Model D exhibit better performance, with lower RMSE values.","PeriodicalId":517766,"journal":{"name":"International Research Journal on Advanced Engineering Hub (IRJAEH)","volume":"28 13","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Research Journal on Advanced Engineering Hub (IRJAEH)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.47392/irjaeh.2024.0194","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Raw water, sourced directly from natural water bodies, is unsuitable for direct consumption due to the presence of various impurities. Therefore, it undergoes treatment at a Water Treatment Plant (WTP) before being supplied to the public. Preliminary treatment involves the removal of floating matter, through screening, while heavier particles settle out by gravity, fine particles remain in suspension, causing turbidity. Effective removal of these suspended particles requires coagulation to form flocs and facilitate the settling. Determining the optimal coagulant dosage is crucial, as both underdoing and overdosing of coagulant can lead to ineffective treatment and increased costs. Conventionally optimum dosage of coagulant is determined by performing jar test. This study focuses on predicting the optimum coagulant dosage using two soft computing techniques: Artificial Neural Network (ANN) and Random Forest (RF). The Input parameters for model development include turbidity, pH, temperature, and alkalinity of raw water from the Parvati Water Treatment Plant, Pune. In this study Four models were developed, namely Model A (Turbidity), Model B (pH, Alkalinity, Temperature, Turbidity), Model C (pH, Alkalinity, Temperature), and Model D (Alkalinity and Turbidity). These models were trained using ANN and RF. Predictions of optimum coagulant doses were made for the testing dataset, and model accuracy was evaluated using Scatter plots, Root Mean Squared Error (RMSE) and Coefficient of Correlation (R). Results indicate that RMSE values of ANN Models are comparatively lower than RF. Comparing among Models A, B, C, and D, Model B and Model D exhibit better performance, with lower RMSE values.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
水处理厂混凝剂最佳用量的预测:人工神经网络与随机森林的比较研究
原水直接取自天然水体,由于含有各种杂质,不适合直接饮用。因此,在向公众供水之前,需要在水处理厂(WTP)进行处理。初步处理包括通过筛选去除漂浮物,较重的颗粒会在重力作用下沉降,而细小的颗粒则会悬浮在水中,造成浑浊。要有效去除这些悬浮颗粒,就需要进行混凝处理,以形成絮凝体,促进沉降。确定最佳的混凝剂用量至关重要,因为混凝剂用量不足或过量都会导致处理效果不佳和成本增加。通常情况下,混凝剂的最佳用量是通过进行罐子试验来确定的。本研究的重点是使用两种软计算技术预测混凝剂的最佳用量:人工神经网络(ANN)和随机森林(RF)。模型开发的输入参数包括浦那 Parvati 水处理厂原水的浊度、pH 值、温度和碱度。本研究开发了四个模型,即模型 A(浊度)、模型 B(pH 值、碱度、温度、浊度)、模型 C(pH 值、碱度、温度)和模型 D(碱度和浊度)。这些模型均使用 ANN 和 RF 进行了训练。对测试数据集的最佳混凝剂剂量进行了预测,并使用散点图、均方根误差(RMSE)和相关系数(R)对模型的准确性进行了评估。结果表明,ANN 模型的 RMSE 值相对低于 RF。与模型 A、B、C 和 D 相比,模型 B 和模型 D 的性能更好,RMSE 值更低。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Dynamic Load Balancing in Cloud Computing: Improving Efficiency and Performance in Real Life Applications Optimizing Renewable Energy Integration in Green Building Projects: Addressing Barriers and Enhancing Energy Performance Drone Technology in Construction Industry Addressing Workplace Harassment and Discrimination: Strategies for Creating Inclusive Environments in Construction Engineering Smart Plant Health Control System
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1