Bodie L. Cotter, J. Norsworthy, Thomas R. Butts, Trenton L. Roberts, Andy Mauromoustakos
{"title":"Flood Timing and Flood Loss Impact on Effectiveness of Florpyrauxifen-benzyl Coated on Urea in Rice","authors":"Bodie L. Cotter, J. Norsworthy, Thomas R. Butts, Trenton L. Roberts, Andy Mauromoustakos","doi":"10.1017/wet.2024.27","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Florpyrauxifen-benzyl applications generated complaints and concerns around rice injury and off-target movement to soybean after the commercial launch in 2018. A precise application method for florpyrauxifen-benzyl was imperative for its continued use. Experiments were conducted in 2020 and 2021 to evaluate rice weed control as influenced by preflood application interval and flood loss following florpyrauxifen-benzyl at 30 g ai ha-1 applied as a spray or coated on urea. In the preflood application experiment, coating florpyrauxifen-benzyl on urea and applying it the day of flood establishment, 5, and 10 d prior to flooding (DPTF) resulted in lower yellow nutsedge, broadleaf signalgrass, and barnyardgrass control than when the herbicide was spray at 3 and 5 wk after final treatment (WAFT). Coating florpyrauxifen-benzyl on urea only provided 61 to 63% yellow nutsedge control at 3 and 5 WAFT, which was 35 to 37 percentage points lower than when spray applied at 5 or 10 DPTF. Likewise, rice yields following applications of florpyrauxifen-benzyl coated on urea were 1200 kg ha-1 less than yields following spray applications. Florpyrauxifen-benzyl coated on urea and clomazone provided lower levels of weed control than spraying the herbicide, suggesting an explanation for the yield losses. The timing of flood loss experiment suggested that when florpyrauxifen-benzyl coated on urea at 30 g ai ha-1 was applied preflood and flood was relinquished at 2 hours, 24 hours, and 7 d after flood establishment, hemp sesbania and yellow nutsedge control were not affected. However, loss of floodwater 2 hours after flood establishment resulted in lower barnyardgrass control than when the flood was lost 24 hours and 7 d after flooding. Generally, the period between a herbicide application and flooding completion should be minimized to aid in weed control. These results indicate the importance of maintaining a flood for weed control and nutrient management.","PeriodicalId":1,"journal":{"name":"Accounts of Chemical Research","volume":"16 11","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":17.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Accounts of Chemical Research","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/wet.2024.27","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Florpyrauxifen-benzyl applications generated complaints and concerns around rice injury and off-target movement to soybean after the commercial launch in 2018. A precise application method for florpyrauxifen-benzyl was imperative for its continued use. Experiments were conducted in 2020 and 2021 to evaluate rice weed control as influenced by preflood application interval and flood loss following florpyrauxifen-benzyl at 30 g ai ha-1 applied as a spray or coated on urea. In the preflood application experiment, coating florpyrauxifen-benzyl on urea and applying it the day of flood establishment, 5, and 10 d prior to flooding (DPTF) resulted in lower yellow nutsedge, broadleaf signalgrass, and barnyardgrass control than when the herbicide was spray at 3 and 5 wk after final treatment (WAFT). Coating florpyrauxifen-benzyl on urea only provided 61 to 63% yellow nutsedge control at 3 and 5 WAFT, which was 35 to 37 percentage points lower than when spray applied at 5 or 10 DPTF. Likewise, rice yields following applications of florpyrauxifen-benzyl coated on urea were 1200 kg ha-1 less than yields following spray applications. Florpyrauxifen-benzyl coated on urea and clomazone provided lower levels of weed control than spraying the herbicide, suggesting an explanation for the yield losses. The timing of flood loss experiment suggested that when florpyrauxifen-benzyl coated on urea at 30 g ai ha-1 was applied preflood and flood was relinquished at 2 hours, 24 hours, and 7 d after flood establishment, hemp sesbania and yellow nutsedge control were not affected. However, loss of floodwater 2 hours after flood establishment resulted in lower barnyardgrass control than when the flood was lost 24 hours and 7 d after flooding. Generally, the period between a herbicide application and flooding completion should be minimized to aid in weed control. These results indicate the importance of maintaining a flood for weed control and nutrient management.
期刊介绍:
Accounts of Chemical Research presents short, concise and critical articles offering easy-to-read overviews of basic research and applications in all areas of chemistry and biochemistry. These short reviews focus on research from the author’s own laboratory and are designed to teach the reader about a research project. In addition, Accounts of Chemical Research publishes commentaries that give an informed opinion on a current research problem. Special Issues online are devoted to a single topic of unusual activity and significance.
Accounts of Chemical Research replaces the traditional article abstract with an article "Conspectus." These entries synopsize the research affording the reader a closer look at the content and significance of an article. Through this provision of a more detailed description of the article contents, the Conspectus enhances the article's discoverability by search engines and the exposure for the research.