Sociopolitical Genealogy of Populist Conspiracy Theories in the Context of Hyperpolitics

IF 0.8 Q3 ETHNIC STUDIES Genealogy Pub Date : 2024-05-23 DOI:10.3390/genealogy8020066
Alessio Esposito
{"title":"Sociopolitical Genealogy of Populist Conspiracy Theories in the Context of Hyperpolitics","authors":"Alessio Esposito","doi":"10.3390/genealogy8020066","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The wide circulation of conspiracy narratives and their frequent intertwining with populist rhetoric is both an element of concern and a topic of intense scientific and philosophical debate. The depth of the link between conspiracy theories and populism represents a crucial issue whose comprehension can facilitate understanding their specific nature and the factors behind their diffusion in public communication. To this end, it is necessary to cultivate an interdisciplinary approach and great critical attention, eschewing monocausal explanations. This paper addresses the question of the essentially political nature of conspiracism, confronting the recent epistemological debate that, by putting the positivist paradigm aside, has sought to explore and understand the socio-cultural roots of conspiracy rhetoric, with its sceptical, antagonistic and hermetic traits. By integrating the reflections of epistemologists such as Cassam or Harris with the considerations of political scientists such as Taggart and with Schmitt’s radical reflections on politics, it is perhaps possible to reintegrate the different approaches to populist conspiracism into an overall social genealogical perspective, thanks also to recent demographic elaborations. Thus, we could ascribe the spread of conspiracism to the prevalence in societies of a hyperpolitical discursive regime, i.e., founded on the principle of opposition, without the possibility of compromise, between different groups and interests. At the basis of such Manichaeism, it is plausible to place in the first place the growing inequalities and related social disintegration, which hinder the circulation of trust and recognition between individuals and groups, thus ending up undermining democracy at its roots, as a political system that legitimises and thus peacefully regulates conflict.","PeriodicalId":73139,"journal":{"name":"Genealogy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Genealogy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/genealogy8020066","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ETHNIC STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The wide circulation of conspiracy narratives and their frequent intertwining with populist rhetoric is both an element of concern and a topic of intense scientific and philosophical debate. The depth of the link between conspiracy theories and populism represents a crucial issue whose comprehension can facilitate understanding their specific nature and the factors behind their diffusion in public communication. To this end, it is necessary to cultivate an interdisciplinary approach and great critical attention, eschewing monocausal explanations. This paper addresses the question of the essentially political nature of conspiracism, confronting the recent epistemological debate that, by putting the positivist paradigm aside, has sought to explore and understand the socio-cultural roots of conspiracy rhetoric, with its sceptical, antagonistic and hermetic traits. By integrating the reflections of epistemologists such as Cassam or Harris with the considerations of political scientists such as Taggart and with Schmitt’s radical reflections on politics, it is perhaps possible to reintegrate the different approaches to populist conspiracism into an overall social genealogical perspective, thanks also to recent demographic elaborations. Thus, we could ascribe the spread of conspiracism to the prevalence in societies of a hyperpolitical discursive regime, i.e., founded on the principle of opposition, without the possibility of compromise, between different groups and interests. At the basis of such Manichaeism, it is plausible to place in the first place the growing inequalities and related social disintegration, which hinder the circulation of trust and recognition between individuals and groups, thus ending up undermining democracy at its roots, as a political system that legitimises and thus peacefully regulates conflict.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
超政治背景下民粹主义阴谋论的社会政治谱系
阴谋论的广泛流传及其与民粹主义言论的频繁交织,既是一个值得关注的因素,也是一个激烈的科学和哲学辩论话题。阴谋论与民粹主义之间联系的深度是一个关键问题,理解这一问题有助于了解阴谋论的具体性质及其在公共传播中传播的背后因素。为此,有必要培养一种跨学科的方法和高度的批判性关注,摒弃单一因果关系的解释。本文探讨了阴谋论本质上的政治性问题,直面最近的认识论辩论,抛开实证主义范式,试图探索和理解阴谋论修辞的社会文化根源,以及其怀疑、对立和神秘的特征。通过将卡萨姆(Cassam)或哈里斯(Harris)等认识论学者的思考与塔格特(Taggart)等政治学家的考虑以及施米特(Schmitt)对政治的激进思考结合起来,或许可以将对民粹主义阴谋论的不同研究方法重新整合到一个整体的社会谱系视角中,这也要归功于最近的人口学阐述。因此,我们可以将阴谋论的传播归因于社会中盛行的超政治话语体系,即建立在不同群体和利益之间的对立原则之上,没有妥协的可能。在这种摩尼教的基础上,首先可以说是日益加剧的不平等和相关的社会解体,这阻碍了个人和团体之间信任和认可的流通,从而最终从根本上破坏了民主这一使冲突合法化、从而以和平方式调节冲突的政治制度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
11 weeks
期刊最新文献
MALAMA: Cultivating Food Sovereignty through Backyard Aquaponics with Native Hawaiian Families. Traces in the History of Swedish Transnational Adoption—A Diffractive Mapping through the Voices of Adoptees and Their Parents Sociopolitical Genealogy of Populist Conspiracy Theories in the Context of Hyperpolitics Mongolian Interethnic Marriage, Ethnic Relations, and National Integration in the PRC Adoption in the Era of Secrecy: Practical and Ethical Challenges Facing Adult Adoptees in the Search for Birth Families
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1