Effects of different sodium–glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors in heart failure with reduced or preserved ejection fraction: a network meta-analysis

Xiaohua Lan, Huijing Zhu, Yanjie Cao, Yue Hu, Xingman Fan, Kaijie Zhang, Mengdi Wu
{"title":"Effects of different sodium–glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors in heart failure with reduced or preserved ejection fraction: a network meta-analysis","authors":"Xiaohua Lan, Huijing Zhu, Yanjie Cao, Yue Hu, Xingman Fan, Kaijie Zhang, Mengdi Wu","doi":"10.3389/fcvm.2024.1379765","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to explore the effects of different sodium–glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors (SGLT2i) on prognosis and cardiac structural remodeling in patients with heart failure (HF).Relevant studies published up to 20 March 2024 were retrieved from PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library CNKI, China Biomedical Literature Service, VIP, and WanFang databases. We included randomized controlled trials of different SGLT2i and pooled the prognosis data of patients with HF. We compared the efficacy of different SGLT2i in patients with HF and conducted a sub-analysis based on left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF).We identified 77 randomized controlled trials involving 43,561 patients. The results showed that SGLT2i significantly enhanced outcomes in HF, including a composite of hospitalizations for HF and cardiovascular death, individual hospitalizations for HF, Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ) scores, left atrial volume index (LAVi), and LVEF among all HF patients (P < 0.05) compared to a placebo. Sotagliflozin was superior to empagliflozin [RR = 0.88, CI (0.79–0.97)] and dapagliflozin [RR = 0.86, CI (0.77–0.96)] in reducing hospitalizations for HF and CV death. Dapagliflozin significantly reduced hospitalizations [RR = 0.51, CI (0.33–0.80)], CV death [RR = 0.73, CI (0.54–0.97)], and all-cause mortality [RR = 0.69, CI (0.48–0.99)] in patients with HF with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). SGLT2i also plays a significant role in improving cardiac remodeling and quality of life (LVMi, LVEDV, KCQQ) (P < 0.05). Among patients with HF with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF), SGLT2i significantly improved cardiac function in HFpEF patients (P < 0.05). In addition, canagliflozin [RR = 0.09, CI (0.01–0.86)] demonstrated greater safety compared to sotagliflozin in a composite of urinary and reproductive infections of HFpEF patients.Our systematic review showed that SGLT2i generally enhances the prognosis of patients with HF. Sotagliflozin demonstrated superiority over empagliflozin and dapagliflozin in a composite of hospitalization for HF and CV death in the overall HF patients. Canagliflozin exhibited greater safety compared to sotagliflozin in a composite of urinary and reproductive infections of HFpEF. Overall, the efficacy of SGLT2i was greater in HFrEF patients than in HFpEF patients.","PeriodicalId":510752,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine","volume":"32 8","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fcvm.2024.1379765","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to explore the effects of different sodium–glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors (SGLT2i) on prognosis and cardiac structural remodeling in patients with heart failure (HF).Relevant studies published up to 20 March 2024 were retrieved from PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library CNKI, China Biomedical Literature Service, VIP, and WanFang databases. We included randomized controlled trials of different SGLT2i and pooled the prognosis data of patients with HF. We compared the efficacy of different SGLT2i in patients with HF and conducted a sub-analysis based on left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF).We identified 77 randomized controlled trials involving 43,561 patients. The results showed that SGLT2i significantly enhanced outcomes in HF, including a composite of hospitalizations for HF and cardiovascular death, individual hospitalizations for HF, Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ) scores, left atrial volume index (LAVi), and LVEF among all HF patients (P < 0.05) compared to a placebo. Sotagliflozin was superior to empagliflozin [RR = 0.88, CI (0.79–0.97)] and dapagliflozin [RR = 0.86, CI (0.77–0.96)] in reducing hospitalizations for HF and CV death. Dapagliflozin significantly reduced hospitalizations [RR = 0.51, CI (0.33–0.80)], CV death [RR = 0.73, CI (0.54–0.97)], and all-cause mortality [RR = 0.69, CI (0.48–0.99)] in patients with HF with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). SGLT2i also plays a significant role in improving cardiac remodeling and quality of life (LVMi, LVEDV, KCQQ) (P < 0.05). Among patients with HF with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF), SGLT2i significantly improved cardiac function in HFpEF patients (P < 0.05). In addition, canagliflozin [RR = 0.09, CI (0.01–0.86)] demonstrated greater safety compared to sotagliflozin in a composite of urinary and reproductive infections of HFpEF patients.Our systematic review showed that SGLT2i generally enhances the prognosis of patients with HF. Sotagliflozin demonstrated superiority over empagliflozin and dapagliflozin in a composite of hospitalization for HF and CV death in the overall HF patients. Canagliflozin exhibited greater safety compared to sotagliflozin in a composite of urinary and reproductive infections of HFpEF. Overall, the efficacy of SGLT2i was greater in HFrEF patients than in HFpEF patients.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
不同钠-葡萄糖共转运体 2 抑制剂对射血分数降低或保留的心力衰竭的影响:网络荟萃分析
本系统综述和荟萃分析旨在探讨不同钠-葡萄糖共转运体-2抑制剂(SGLT2i)对心力衰竭(HF)患者预后和心脏结构重塑的影响。我们从PubMed、EMBASE、Web of Science、Cochrane Library CNKI、中国生物医学文献服务网、VIP和万方数据库中检索了截至2024年3月20日发表的相关研究。我们纳入了不同 SGLT2i 的随机对照试验,并汇总了心房颤动患者的预后数据。我们比较了不同 SGLT2i 对 HF 患者的疗效,并根据左心室射血分数(LVEF)进行了子分析。结果表明,与安慰剂相比,SGLT2i能显著改善HF患者的预后,包括HF住院和心血管死亡的综合情况、HF的单次住院情况、堪萨斯城心肌病问卷(KCCQ)评分、左心房容积指数(LAVi)和所有HF患者的LVEF(P<0.05)。在减少HF住院和CV死亡方面,Sotagliflozin优于empagliflozin [RR = 0.88,CI (0.79-0.97)]和dapagliflozin [RR = 0.86,CI (0.77-0.96)]。达帕格列净可显著减少射血分数降低的 HF(HFrEF)患者的住院次数[RR = 0.51,CI (0.33-0.80)]、CV 死亡[RR = 0.73,CI (0.54-0.97)]和全因死亡率[RR = 0.69,CI (0.48-0.99)]。SGLT2i 对改善心脏重塑和生活质量(LVMi、LVEDV、KCQQ)也有显著作用(P < 0.05)。在射血分数保留型心房颤动(HFpEF)患者中,SGLT2i 能显著改善 HFpEF 患者的心功能(P < 0.05)。此外,在HFpEF患者泌尿和生殖系统感染的综合治疗中,卡格列净[RR = 0.09, CI (0.01-0.86)]比索他格列净更具安全性。我们的系统综述显示,SGLT2i 一般可改善高血压患者的预后。在高血压住院和心血管疾病死亡的综合指标方面,索他利氟嗪优于恩格列净和达帕格列净。在HFpEF患者泌尿系统和生殖系统感染的综合治疗中,Canagliflozin的安全性高于sotagliflozin。总体而言,SGLT2i 对 HFrEF 患者的疗效高于 HFpEF 患者。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Case Report: Asymptomatic SARS-COV2 infection triggering recurrent Takotsubo syndrome Population-wide impact of a pragmatic program to identify and manage individuals at high-risk of cardiovascular disease: a cluster randomized trial in 120 villages from Northern China Novel components in the nuclear factor-kappa B (NF-κB) signaling pathways of endothelial cells under hyperglycemic-ischemic conditions Age-associated declined function of endothelial progenitor cells and its correlation with plasma IL-18 or IL-23 concentrations in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction Challenging of ECMO application in pediatric restrictive cardiomyopathy: case report of a novel TNNI3 variant
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1