Effect of single-dose intravenous lignocaine versus fentanyl on neuromuscular recovery time after general anesthesia in elective pediatric surgery: A randomized controlled pilot study

Mridul Dhar, Ruhi Sharma, Yashwant S. Payal, Vaishali Gupta, Jyoti Rawat, Sachin Sogal
{"title":"Effect of single-dose intravenous lignocaine versus fentanyl on neuromuscular recovery time after general anesthesia in elective pediatric surgery: A randomized controlled pilot study","authors":"Mridul Dhar, Ruhi Sharma, Yashwant S. Payal, Vaishali Gupta, Jyoti Rawat, Sachin Sogal","doi":"10.4103/joacp.joacp_460_23","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n \n \n Intravenous (IV) lignocaine is often used to prevent the airway response to extubation, especially in children to prevent respiratory adverse events. It is known to prolong the duration of action of neuromuscular blocking drugs, but data in children are limited. The primary objective of this study was to compare neuromuscular recovery time with IV lignocaine versus fentanyl, in pediatric patients undergoing elective surgery under general anesthesia (GA). Secondary objectives included the comparison of clinical parameters and respiratory complications.\n \n \n \n A randomized double-blind pilot study was conducted in 42 children aged 2–8 years undergoing GA with neuromuscular blockade, who received either 1.5 mg/kg of lignocaine or 0.5 mcg/kg of fentanyl IV, just prior to giving reversal at a train of four (TOF) count of 2–3. Time to achieve a TOF ratio of 0.9 and extubation and hemodynamic and respiratory parameters were noted. Incidences of coughing, bucking, laryngospasm, etc., were also noted. P value < 0.05 was considered significant.\n \n \n \n Demographic and operative data were similar. Time from reversal to TOF ratio of 0.9 was similar with both lignocaine (6.79 ± 3.03 mins) and fentanyl (6.79 ± 3.31 mins), P = 0.99. Time to extubation was also similar in both groups (8.14 ± 3.31 vs 9.19 ± 2.89 min), P = 0.28. Bucking incidence was higher with fentanyl (23.8%) vs lignocaine (9.5%), P = 0.41.\n \n \n \n Single-dose IV lignocaine administered before reversal did not prolong neuromuscular recovery time compared to fentanyl, with a similar (low) incidence of respiratory events in pediatric patients.\n","PeriodicalId":508221,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Anaesthesiology Clinical Pharmacology","volume":"15 21","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Anaesthesiology Clinical Pharmacology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/joacp.joacp_460_23","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Intravenous (IV) lignocaine is often used to prevent the airway response to extubation, especially in children to prevent respiratory adverse events. It is known to prolong the duration of action of neuromuscular blocking drugs, but data in children are limited. The primary objective of this study was to compare neuromuscular recovery time with IV lignocaine versus fentanyl, in pediatric patients undergoing elective surgery under general anesthesia (GA). Secondary objectives included the comparison of clinical parameters and respiratory complications. A randomized double-blind pilot study was conducted in 42 children aged 2–8 years undergoing GA with neuromuscular blockade, who received either 1.5 mg/kg of lignocaine or 0.5 mcg/kg of fentanyl IV, just prior to giving reversal at a train of four (TOF) count of 2–3. Time to achieve a TOF ratio of 0.9 and extubation and hemodynamic and respiratory parameters were noted. Incidences of coughing, bucking, laryngospasm, etc., were also noted. P value < 0.05 was considered significant. Demographic and operative data were similar. Time from reversal to TOF ratio of 0.9 was similar with both lignocaine (6.79 ± 3.03 mins) and fentanyl (6.79 ± 3.31 mins), P = 0.99. Time to extubation was also similar in both groups (8.14 ± 3.31 vs 9.19 ± 2.89 min), P = 0.28. Bucking incidence was higher with fentanyl (23.8%) vs lignocaine (9.5%), P = 0.41. Single-dose IV lignocaine administered before reversal did not prolong neuromuscular recovery time compared to fentanyl, with a similar (low) incidence of respiratory events in pediatric patients.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
单剂量静脉注射木质素与芬太尼对儿科择期手术全身麻醉后神经肌肉恢复时间的影响:随机对照试验研究
静脉注射(IV)利诺卡因常用于预防拔管时的气道反应,尤其是在儿童中,以防止呼吸系统不良事件的发生。众所周知,它可延长神经肌肉阻滞药物的作用时间,但在儿童中的数据有限。本研究的主要目的是比较在全身麻醉(GA)下接受择期手术的儿童患者使用静脉注射利格诺卡因和芬太尼的神经肌肉恢复时间。次要目标包括比较临床参数和呼吸系统并发症。 我们在 42 名接受神经肌肉阻滞全身麻醉的 2-8 岁儿童中进行了随机双盲试验研究,这些儿童在四组(TOF)数为 2-3 时给予逆转之前,静脉注射了 1.5 毫克/千克的木质素或 0.5 微克/千克的芬太尼。记录达到 TOF 比率 0.9 和拔管的时间以及血液动力学和呼吸参数。还记录了咳嗽、呛咳、喉痉挛等情况。P值小于0.05为有意义。 人口统计学和手术数据相似。利格诺卡因(6.79 ± 3.03 分钟)和芬太尼(6.79 ± 3.31 分钟)从逆转到 TOF 比率达到 0.9 的时间相似,P = 0.99。两组的拔管时间也相似(8.14 ± 3.31 vs 9.19 ± 2.89 分钟),P = 0.28。芬太尼(23.8%)与利诺卡因(9.5%)的降压发生率更高,P = 0.41。 与芬太尼相比,逆转前单次静脉注射木质素不会延长神经肌肉恢复时间,而且儿科患者的呼吸事件发生率相似(较低)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Analgesic efficacy of ultrasound-guided retrolaminar block in truncal surgeries: A narrative review Anesthetic challenges in using posterior retroperitoneoscopic approach for phaeochromocytoma in pregnancy A case of lost endotracheal tube PONV, beyond “Apfel” score Clinical experience with stellate ganglion block in a neonate
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1