Static Ultrasonographic Assessment for Central Venous Catheterization Reduces Catheter Dysfunction in the Emergency Department

IF 0.3 Q4 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING JOURNAL OF DIAGNOSTIC MEDICAL SONOGRAPHY Pub Date : 2024-05-23 DOI:10.1177/87564793241252168
Ali Çebişli, Nezihat Rana Dişel, Ömer Taşkın, Ayça Açıkalın Akpınar, Ahmet Sebe
{"title":"Static Ultrasonographic Assessment for Central Venous Catheterization Reduces Catheter Dysfunction in the Emergency Department","authors":"Ali Çebişli, Nezihat Rana Dişel, Ömer Taşkın, Ayça Açıkalın Akpınar, Ahmet Sebe","doi":"10.1177/87564793241252168","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study aimed to investigate the effect of a static ultrasonographic (US) examination of the central venous structures before central venous catheterization (CVC) and the success of the procedure. In this prospective study, patients who underwent CVC, in an emergency department (ED), were divided into two groups: patients who underwent CVC using the anatomical landmark technique (n = 34) and patients who underwent CVC using a static US examination (n = 33). The procedure times, success rates, and number of catheters used were compared. A total of 67 patients who underwent CVC were included in the study. Compared with the anatomical landmark technique, the static US examination had a higher procedural success rate ( P = .001), fewer total interventions ( P = .001), and fewer postprocedural catheter dysfunctions ( P = .048). While there was no difference in the duration of the CVC between groups ( P = .222), the total time spent was longer using a static US examination ( P = .022). The static US examination was a practical, easy-to-apply method that could be used for CVC placement in an ED. This study demonstrated sonography had a high success rate in CVC procedures and contributed to a reduction in the number of interventions and catheters used.","PeriodicalId":45758,"journal":{"name":"JOURNAL OF DIAGNOSTIC MEDICAL SONOGRAPHY","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JOURNAL OF DIAGNOSTIC MEDICAL SONOGRAPHY","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/87564793241252168","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study aimed to investigate the effect of a static ultrasonographic (US) examination of the central venous structures before central venous catheterization (CVC) and the success of the procedure. In this prospective study, patients who underwent CVC, in an emergency department (ED), were divided into two groups: patients who underwent CVC using the anatomical landmark technique (n = 34) and patients who underwent CVC using a static US examination (n = 33). The procedure times, success rates, and number of catheters used were compared. A total of 67 patients who underwent CVC were included in the study. Compared with the anatomical landmark technique, the static US examination had a higher procedural success rate ( P = .001), fewer total interventions ( P = .001), and fewer postprocedural catheter dysfunctions ( P = .048). While there was no difference in the duration of the CVC between groups ( P = .222), the total time spent was longer using a static US examination ( P = .022). The static US examination was a practical, easy-to-apply method that could be used for CVC placement in an ED. This study demonstrated sonography had a high success rate in CVC procedures and contributed to a reduction in the number of interventions and catheters used.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
中心静脉导管插入术的静态超声评估可减少急诊科导管功能障碍
本研究旨在探讨中心静脉导管插入术(CVC)前对中心静脉结构进行静态超声波(US)检查的效果以及手术的成功率。在这项前瞻性研究中,急诊科(ED)中接受 CVC 的患者被分为两组:使用解剖地标技术接受 CVC 的患者(34 人)和使用静态 US 检查接受 CVC 的患者(33 人)。两组患者的手术时间、成功率和使用的导管数量进行了比较。研究共纳入了 67 名接受 CVC 手术的患者。与解剖地标技术相比,静态 US 检查的手术成功率更高(P = .001),总介入次数更少(P = .001),术后导管功能障碍更少(P = .048)。虽然各组之间的 CVC 持续时间没有差异 ( P = .222),但使用静态 US 检查所花费的总时间更长 ( P = .022)。静态 US 检查是一种实用、易于应用的方法,可用于急诊室的 CVC 置放。这项研究表明,超声波检查在 CVC 手术中的成功率很高,并有助于减少介入治疗和导管使用的次数。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
JOURNAL OF DIAGNOSTIC MEDICAL SONOGRAPHY
JOURNAL OF DIAGNOSTIC MEDICAL SONOGRAPHY RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING-
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
122
期刊介绍: The Journal of Diagnostic Medical Sonography (JDMS) is the official journal of the Society of Diagnostic Medical Sonography and publishes peer-reviewed manuscripts aimed at the translational use of ultrasound for diagnosis, intervention, and other clinical applications. The JDMS provides research, clinical, and educational content for all specialties including but not limited to abdominal, women’s health, pediatric, cardiovascular, and musculoskeletal sonography. The journal’s scope may also include research on instrumentation, physics, ergonomics, technical advancements, education, and professional issues in the field of sonography. Types of submissions accepted by the JDMS are Original Research, Literature Review, Case Studies, Symposia (related to education, policy, technology, or professional issues), and Letters to the Editor.
期刊最新文献
SDMS CME Credit – Patient’s Experience Receiving Ultrasonography-Guided Injections by an Advanced Physical Therapy Practitioner: A Qualitative Study SDMS CME Credit – Prenatal Detection of Mosaic Trisomy 14 Secondary to Sonographic Findings SDMS CME Credit – Persistent Left Superior Vena Cava and Agitated Saline: A Strategically Thinking Sonographer’s Perspective SDMS CME Credit – Occlusive Thrombosis of the Superior Mesenteric Vein Following Duodenal Switch Procedure: A Case Study SDMS CME Credit – Transesophageal Echocardiography: Timely Resolution of an Urgent Right Atrial Mass/ Hepatocellular Carcinoma Thrombosis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1