For the many not the few: introducing just transition for supply chain management

H. Karaosman, Donna Marshall, Irene Ward
{"title":"For the many not the few: introducing just transition for supply chain management","authors":"H. Karaosman, Donna Marshall, Irene Ward","doi":"10.1108/ijopm-07-2023-0587","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"PurposeJust transition is a fundamental concept for supply chain management but neither discipline pays attention to the other and little is known about how supply chains can be orchestrated as socioecological systems to manage these transitions. Building from a wide range of just transition examples, this paper explores just transition to understand how to move beyond instrumental supply chain practices to supply chains functioning in harmony with the planet and its people.Design/methodology/approachBuilding from a systematic review of 72 papers, the paper identifies just transition examples while interpreting them through the theoretical lens of supply chain management, providing valuable insights to help research and practice understand how to achieve low-carbon economies through supply chain management in environmentally and socially just ways.FindingsThe paper defines, elaborates, and extends the just transition construct by developing a transition taxonomy with two key dimensions. The purpose dimension (profit or shared outcomes) and the governance dimension (government-/industry-led versus civil society-involved), generating four transition archetypes. Most transitions projects are framed around the Euro- and US-centric, capitalist standards of development, leading to coloniality as well as economic and cultural depletion of communities. Framing just transition in accordance with context-specific plural values, the paper provides an alternative perspective to the extractive transition concept. This can guide supply chain management to decarbonise economies and societies by considering the rights of nature, communities and individuals.Originality/valueIntroducing just transition into the supply chain management domain, this paper unifies the various conceptualisations of just transition into a holistic understanding, providing a new foundation for supply chain management research.","PeriodicalId":273410,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Operations & Production Management","volume":"24 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Operations & Production Management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/ijopm-07-2023-0587","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

PurposeJust transition is a fundamental concept for supply chain management but neither discipline pays attention to the other and little is known about how supply chains can be orchestrated as socioecological systems to manage these transitions. Building from a wide range of just transition examples, this paper explores just transition to understand how to move beyond instrumental supply chain practices to supply chains functioning in harmony with the planet and its people.Design/methodology/approachBuilding from a systematic review of 72 papers, the paper identifies just transition examples while interpreting them through the theoretical lens of supply chain management, providing valuable insights to help research and practice understand how to achieve low-carbon economies through supply chain management in environmentally and socially just ways.FindingsThe paper defines, elaborates, and extends the just transition construct by developing a transition taxonomy with two key dimensions. The purpose dimension (profit or shared outcomes) and the governance dimension (government-/industry-led versus civil society-involved), generating four transition archetypes. Most transitions projects are framed around the Euro- and US-centric, capitalist standards of development, leading to coloniality as well as economic and cultural depletion of communities. Framing just transition in accordance with context-specific plural values, the paper provides an alternative perspective to the extractive transition concept. This can guide supply chain management to decarbonise economies and societies by considering the rights of nature, communities and individuals.Originality/valueIntroducing just transition into the supply chain management domain, this paper unifies the various conceptualisations of just transition into a holistic understanding, providing a new foundation for supply chain management research.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
为多不为少:为供应链管理引入公正过渡
目的 公正过渡是供应链管理的一个基本概念,但这两门学科都不重视其他概念,而且人们对如何将供应链作为社会生态系统来管理这些过渡知之甚少。本文以大量公正过渡的实例为基础,探讨公正过渡,以了解如何超越工具性供应链实践,使供应链与地球和人类和谐共处。设计/方法/途径本文在对 72 篇论文进行系统回顾的基础上,确定了公正过渡的范例,同时通过供应链管理的理论视角对这些范例进行了解读,为研究和实践提供了有价值的见解,帮助人们了解如何通过供应链管理以环境和社会公正的方式实现低碳经济。研究结果本文通过制定具有两个关键维度的过渡分类法,对公正过渡的概念进行了定义、阐述和扩展。目的维度(利润或共享成果)和治理维度(政府/行业主导与民间社会参与),产生了四种转型原型。大多数过渡项目都是围绕以欧洲和美国为中心的资本主义发展标准制定的,这导致了殖民主义以及社区的经济和文化衰退。本文根据特定背景下的多元价值观来构建公正转型,为采掘式转型概念提供了另一种视角。这可以指导供应链管理,通过考虑自然、社区和个人的权利,实现经济和社会的去碳化。原创性/价值本文将公正过渡引入供应链管理领域,将公正过渡的各种概念统一为一种整体理解,为供应链管理研究提供了新的基础。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Geopolitical disruptions and supply chain structural ambidexterity Geopolitical disruptions and supply chain structural ambidexterity An experimental investigation of environmental knowledge sharing in a supply chain coopetition situation An experimental investigation of environmental knowledge sharing in a supply chain coopetition situation The influence of institutional logics on vaccine development, production and distribution in Africa
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1