Chinese People’s Child Bearing and Rearing Beliefs: The Interplay Between Confucianism and Neoliberalism

IF 2.4 3区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology Pub Date : 2024-05-22 DOI:10.1177/00220221241248596
Shuning Liu, Hongli Wang
{"title":"Chinese People’s Child Bearing and Rearing Beliefs: The Interplay Between Confucianism and Neoliberalism","authors":"Shuning Liu, Hongli Wang","doi":"10.1177/00220221241248596","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Previous research on Chinese people’s child bearing and rearing beliefs (CBRBs) has overwhelmingly focused on how Chinese view specific issues about child bearing and rearing and shown Confucian and neoliberal perspectives on these issues. However, limited studies have adopted a holistic view to analyze Chinese people’s CBRBs and explored the influence of the interplay between Confucianism and neoliberalism on their CBRBs comprehensively. This study aimed to bridge this gap by examining 2,590 pieces of posts (microblogs published by users) containing the hashtag “#The proper beliefs about child bearing and rearing#” on Weibo, one of the most popular social media sites in China. Corpus analysis and reflexive thematic analysis methods were used to quantitatively and qualitatively analyze the data, and five themes with various subthemes about Chinese people’s CBRBs were generated. This study uncovered that the three themes, namely, Parenthood Is Optional, How to Raise Children and Rewards of Child Bearing and Rearing, reflect an integration of Confucianism and neoliberalism, while Blind Compliance (to Parents’ Demands) Is Not Advisable and Costliness to Women show a neoliberal perspective. The findings enhance the understanding of Chinese people’s CBRBs and the influence of the interplay between Confucian and neoliberal cultures on their CBRBs, and provide insight for all concerned to improve fertility and health care programs.","PeriodicalId":48354,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00220221241248596","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Previous research on Chinese people’s child bearing and rearing beliefs (CBRBs) has overwhelmingly focused on how Chinese view specific issues about child bearing and rearing and shown Confucian and neoliberal perspectives on these issues. However, limited studies have adopted a holistic view to analyze Chinese people’s CBRBs and explored the influence of the interplay between Confucianism and neoliberalism on their CBRBs comprehensively. This study aimed to bridge this gap by examining 2,590 pieces of posts (microblogs published by users) containing the hashtag “#The proper beliefs about child bearing and rearing#” on Weibo, one of the most popular social media sites in China. Corpus analysis and reflexive thematic analysis methods were used to quantitatively and qualitatively analyze the data, and five themes with various subthemes about Chinese people’s CBRBs were generated. This study uncovered that the three themes, namely, Parenthood Is Optional, How to Raise Children and Rewards of Child Bearing and Rearing, reflect an integration of Confucianism and neoliberalism, while Blind Compliance (to Parents’ Demands) Is Not Advisable and Costliness to Women show a neoliberal perspective. The findings enhance the understanding of Chinese people’s CBRBs and the influence of the interplay between Confucian and neoliberal cultures on their CBRBs, and provide insight for all concerned to improve fertility and health care programs.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
中国人的生儿育女观念:儒家思想与新自由主义的相互作用
以往关于中国人生育和养育子女观念(CBRBs)的研究绝大多数集中在中国人如何看待有关生育和养育子女的具体问题上,并展示了儒家和新自由主义在这些问题上的观点。然而,采用整体视角分析中国人的生养观念,并全面探讨儒家思想与新自由主义之间的相互作用对中国人生养观念的影响的研究还很有限。本研究通过对中国最受欢迎的社交媒体之一--微博上2590条包含 "#正确的生儿育女观念#"标签的帖子(用户发布的微博)进行研究,旨在弥补这一空白。研究采用语料库分析法和反思性主题分析法对数据进行定量和定性分析,得出了关于中国人生儿育女观念的五个主题及不同的副主题。研究发现,"为人父母是可选项"、"如何养育子女 "和 "生儿育女的回报 "这三个主题反映了儒家思想与新自由主义的融合,而 "盲目顺从(父母的要求)是不可取的 "和 "女性的代价 "则显示了新自由主义的视角。这些研究结果加深了人们对中国人的生育和养育行为以及儒家文化和新自由主义文化的相互作用对中国人生育和养育行为的影响的理解,并为有关各方改进生育和保健计划提供了启示。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
6.70%
发文量
69
期刊介绍: Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology publishes papers that focus on the interrelationships between culture and psychological processes. Submitted manuscripts may report results from either cross-cultural comparative research or results from other types of research concerning the ways in which culture (and related concepts such as ethnicity) affect the thinking and behavior of individuals as well as how individual thought and behavior define and reflect aspects of culture. Review papers and innovative reformulations of cross-cultural theory will also be considered. Studies reporting data from within a single nation should focus on cross-cultural perspective. Empirical studies must be described in sufficient detail to be potentially replicable.
期刊最新文献
A Quantitative Systematic Review to Evaluate the Favorability of the DSM-5 Cultural Formulation Interview (CFI) on the Acceptability, Feasibility, and Clinical Utility for Clinicians, Patients, and Relatives Studying Culture, a Methodological Endeavor Exploring Professional and Carer Stakeholder Conceptualizations of Child and Adolescent Mental Health in Malawi Using a Contextual Co-Design Methodology: The Interplay of Pathology, the Supernatural, and a Pathway to Healing The Role of Perceived Forms of Discrimination Within the Psychological Acculturation Process of First-Generation Immigrants: A Scoping Review Who Is Your Biggest Critic? Cultural Variation in Moral Judgments of the Self and Others
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1