Attention Focus and New Opportunities: The Moderating Role of Managerial Attention to Alternative Issues

IF 4.9 2区 管理学 Q1 MANAGEMENT Organization Science Pub Date : 2024-05-21 DOI:10.1287/orsc.2021.15861
John Eklund, Manav Raj, J. P. Eggers
{"title":"Attention Focus and New Opportunities: The Moderating Role of Managerial Attention to Alternative Issues","authors":"John Eklund, Manav Raj, J. P. Eggers","doi":"10.1287/orsc.2021.15861","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The strategy literature highlights the critical role that managerial attention plays in shaping firms’ responses to industry change. However, attention to change alone is not sufficient to precipitate action. The context in which this attention is paid is also critical in determining the translation of attention to action as managers generally pay attention to multiple issues within their strategic agendas. We argue that attention to a competing issue and the breadth of managerial strategic attention impair the relationship between attention to a focal issue and related organizational action as these attentional constraints may lead to hesitancy or confusion at an individual level and reduced coordination at an organizational level. Realizing that at an organizational level, firms vary tremendously with respect to their sizes, resources, and by implication their overall attentional capacities, we argue that the negative moderation impacts of attention to a competing issue and the breadth of strategic attention on the attention to a focal issue–subsequent action relationship are larger for smaller firms. Studying the U.S. electric utility industry and the emerging new distributed electricity generation business model, we find broad support for our arguments and also important nuance. By melding theory, important details of our empirical setting, and intriguing empirical results, we develop greater insights into when and how the other strategic issues to which managers pay attention can shape the translation of managerial attention to a new business model into subsequent organizational action. Supplemental Material: The online appendix is available at https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.2021.15861 .","PeriodicalId":48462,"journal":{"name":"Organization Science","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Organization Science","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.2021.15861","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The strategy literature highlights the critical role that managerial attention plays in shaping firms’ responses to industry change. However, attention to change alone is not sufficient to precipitate action. The context in which this attention is paid is also critical in determining the translation of attention to action as managers generally pay attention to multiple issues within their strategic agendas. We argue that attention to a competing issue and the breadth of managerial strategic attention impair the relationship between attention to a focal issue and related organizational action as these attentional constraints may lead to hesitancy or confusion at an individual level and reduced coordination at an organizational level. Realizing that at an organizational level, firms vary tremendously with respect to their sizes, resources, and by implication their overall attentional capacities, we argue that the negative moderation impacts of attention to a competing issue and the breadth of strategic attention on the attention to a focal issue–subsequent action relationship are larger for smaller firms. Studying the U.S. electric utility industry and the emerging new distributed electricity generation business model, we find broad support for our arguments and also important nuance. By melding theory, important details of our empirical setting, and intriguing empirical results, we develop greater insights into when and how the other strategic issues to which managers pay attention can shape the translation of managerial attention to a new business model into subsequent organizational action. Supplemental Material: The online appendix is available at https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.2021.15861 .
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
关注焦点与新机遇:管理者对其他问题的关注的调节作用
战略文献强调了管理者的关注在企业应对行业变革中的关键作用。然而,仅仅关注变革还不足以促成行动。这种关注所处的环境也是决定关注能否转化为行动的关键,因为管理者通常会关注其战略议程中的多个问题。我们认为,对竞争性问题的关注和管理者战略关注的广度会损害对焦点问题的关注与相关组织行动之间的关系,因为这些关注限制可能会导致个人层面的犹豫或困惑以及组织层面的协调性降低。考虑到在组织层面上,企业在规模、资源以及整体注意力能力方面存在巨大差异,我们认为,对于规模较小的企业而言,对竞争性问题的关注以及战略关注的广度对关注焦点问题与后续行动之间关系的负面调节作用更大。通过研究美国电力公用事业行业和新兴的分布式发电商业模式,我们发现我们的论点得到了广泛支持,同时也发现了重要的细微差别。通过将理论、实证环境的重要细节和引人入胜的实证结果融为一体,我们对管理者关注的其他战略问题何时以及如何影响管理者对新商业模式的关注转化为随后的组织行动有了更深入的了解。补充材料:在线附录见 https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.2021.15861 。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Organization Science
Organization Science MANAGEMENT-
CiteScore
7.90
自引率
4.90%
发文量
166
期刊介绍: Organization Science is ranked among the top journals in management by the Social Science Citation Index in terms of impact and is widely recognized in the fields of strategy, management, and organization theory. Organization Science provides one umbrella for the publication of research from all over the world in fields such as organization theory, strategic management, sociology, economics, political science, history, information science, communication theory, and psychology.
期刊最新文献
Can You Go Home Again? Performance Assistance Between Boomerangs and Incumbent Employees Cautious Exploitation: Learning and Search in Problems of Evaluation and Discovery Embrace the Unexpected: How Organizations Foster Participatory Improvisation with Customers Temporal Miscoupling: The Challenges and Consequences of Enacting a Practice in Decline Mavericks and Diplomats: Bridging Commercial and Institutional Entrepreneurship for Society’s Grand Challenges
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1