Landan MacDonald, Jesse Ory, T. Pulakunta, Dawn L. MacLellan
{"title":"Standardizing male pelvic anatomy teaching using a clinical enrichment video","authors":"Landan MacDonald, Jesse Ory, T. Pulakunta, Dawn L. MacLellan","doi":"10.5489/cuaj.8712","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: Evolving trends in medical education and modern curricular changes have reduced the amount of time and resources allocated for anatomy education. As the amount of dedicated anatomy education time decreases, more self-directed learning is required. Cadaveric dissection and didactic teaching have been supplemented with multimedia, clinical anatomy, and imaging for over 20 years with mixed results. Specifically, the use of video-based anatomy teaching increases medical learning, if done methodically.\nMethods: A 20-minute video was produced highlighting surgical anatomy using the following operative cases: perineal anatomy (artificial urinary sphincter case), inguinal and testicular anatomy (scrotal orchidopexy for acute testicular torsion), prostate anatomy (robotic radical prostatectomy), and bladder anatomy (endoscopy). The annotated video was shown to first-year medical students. Pre- and post-multiple-choice question quizzes were given to the students. Once submitted, the students completed a survey.\nResults: Overall, 191 first-year medical students participated in our study. Average scores were similar between each quiz (50±16% vs. 49±17%); there was no statistically significant change. Seventy-seven percent of participants felt the video improved their knowledge of urologic anatomy and 83% agreed the video should be shown to future classes. Sixty percent of participants felt the video solidified their anatomy knowledge. Although 78% felt the video was stimulating and entertaining, 43% of the students felt the video increased their interest in pursuing urology as a career choice.\nConclusions: Anatomy teaching can be supplemented using surgical videos, especially in a time when in-person anatomy teaching is limited. Further study is required to determine if this teaching modality improves long-term anatomy knowledge retention.","PeriodicalId":38001,"journal":{"name":"Canadian Urological Association Journal","volume":"115 13","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Canadian Urological Association Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5489/cuaj.8712","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Introduction: Evolving trends in medical education and modern curricular changes have reduced the amount of time and resources allocated for anatomy education. As the amount of dedicated anatomy education time decreases, more self-directed learning is required. Cadaveric dissection and didactic teaching have been supplemented with multimedia, clinical anatomy, and imaging for over 20 years with mixed results. Specifically, the use of video-based anatomy teaching increases medical learning, if done methodically.
Methods: A 20-minute video was produced highlighting surgical anatomy using the following operative cases: perineal anatomy (artificial urinary sphincter case), inguinal and testicular anatomy (scrotal orchidopexy for acute testicular torsion), prostate anatomy (robotic radical prostatectomy), and bladder anatomy (endoscopy). The annotated video was shown to first-year medical students. Pre- and post-multiple-choice question quizzes were given to the students. Once submitted, the students completed a survey.
Results: Overall, 191 first-year medical students participated in our study. Average scores were similar between each quiz (50±16% vs. 49±17%); there was no statistically significant change. Seventy-seven percent of participants felt the video improved their knowledge of urologic anatomy and 83% agreed the video should be shown to future classes. Sixty percent of participants felt the video solidified their anatomy knowledge. Although 78% felt the video was stimulating and entertaining, 43% of the students felt the video increased their interest in pursuing urology as a career choice.
Conclusions: Anatomy teaching can be supplemented using surgical videos, especially in a time when in-person anatomy teaching is limited. Further study is required to determine if this teaching modality improves long-term anatomy knowledge retention.
期刊介绍:
Published by the Canadian Urological Association, the Canadian Urological Association Journal (CUAJ) released its first issue in March 2007, and was published four times that year under the guidance of founding editor (Editor Emeritus as of 2012), Dr. Laurence H. Klotz. In 2008, CUAJ became a bimonthly publication. As of 2013, articles have been published monthly, alternating between print and online-only versions (print issues are available in February, April, June, August, October, and December; online-only issues are produced in January, March, May, July, September, and November). In 2017, the journal launched an ahead-of-print publishing strategy, in which accepted manuscripts are published electronically on our website and cited on PubMed ahead of their official issue-based publication date. By significantly shortening the time to article availability, we offer our readers more flexibility in the way they engage with our content: as a continuous stream, or in a monthly “package,” or both. CUAJ covers a broad range of urological topics — oncology, pediatrics, transplantation, endourology, female urology, infertility, and more. We take pride in showcasing the work of some of Canada’s top investigators and providing our readers with the latest relevant evidence-based research, and on being the primary repository for major guidelines and other important practice recommendations. Our long-term vision is to become an essential destination for urology-based research, education, and advocacy for both physicians and patients, and to act as a springboard for discussions within the urologic community.