Systemic vs. in-irrigation tranexamic acid in percutaneous nephrolithotomy

D. Hinojosa-González, Bhaskar Somani, Daniel Olvera-Posada, Michal Segall, Juliana Villanueva-Congote, Brian H. Eisner
{"title":"Systemic vs. in-irrigation tranexamic acid in percutaneous nephrolithotomy","authors":"D. Hinojosa-González, Bhaskar Somani, Daniel Olvera-Posada, Michal Segall, Juliana Villanueva-Congote, Brian H. Eisner","doi":"10.5489/cuaj.8721","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: Percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) is the gold-standard treatment for large renal stones. One potentially significant complication of PCNL is blood loss, which can result in transfusion requirement and poorer stone-free outcomes. Tranexamic acid (TXA) has emerged as a promising intervention, administered systemically (TXA-S) or as part of irrigation fluid (TXA-I) in endourology. This study aimed to comprehensively analyze existing evidence regarding the applications of TXA in PCNL through a Bayesian network meta-analysis, offering insights into its efficacy and comparative effectiveness.\nMethods: In February 2022, a PRISMA-compliant systematic review (PROSPERO registration number CRD42021270593) was performed to identify randomized controlled clinical trials (RCT) on TXA as either systemic therapy or in irrigation fluid. Studies in other languages other than English and Spanish were not considered. A Bayesian network was built using results from identified studies to create models that were later run through Markov Chain Monte Carlo sampling through 200000 iterations.\nResults: Eight RCTs compared TXA-S vs. placebo, one TXA-I vs. placebo, and one TXA-I vs. TXA-S. TXA-I had lower risk of transfusion (relative risk [RR], 0.63 [0.47,0.84], SUCRA 0.950) than TXA-S (RR 0.79 [0.65,0.95], SUCRA 0.545). TXA-I had a lower risk of complications (RR 0.38 [0.21,0.67], SUCRA=0.957) compared to TXA-S (RR 0.55 [0.39, 0.78], SUCRA 0.539). TXA-I had a lower postoperative decrease in hemoglobin (MD -1.2 [1.3, 1.0], SUCRA 0.849) compared to TXA-S (MD-0.97 [-1.0, -0.93], SUCRA 0.646]).\nConclusions: TXA, regardless of the route of administration, is an effective intervention in decreasing bleeding, postoperative complications, and risk of transfusion when compared with placebo. Further studies directly comparing TXA-S to TXA-I would be useful to determine the optimal route of delivery.","PeriodicalId":38001,"journal":{"name":"Canadian Urological Association Journal","volume":"31 33","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Canadian Urological Association Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5489/cuaj.8721","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) is the gold-standard treatment for large renal stones. One potentially significant complication of PCNL is blood loss, which can result in transfusion requirement and poorer stone-free outcomes. Tranexamic acid (TXA) has emerged as a promising intervention, administered systemically (TXA-S) or as part of irrigation fluid (TXA-I) in endourology. This study aimed to comprehensively analyze existing evidence regarding the applications of TXA in PCNL through a Bayesian network meta-analysis, offering insights into its efficacy and comparative effectiveness. Methods: In February 2022, a PRISMA-compliant systematic review (PROSPERO registration number CRD42021270593) was performed to identify randomized controlled clinical trials (RCT) on TXA as either systemic therapy or in irrigation fluid. Studies in other languages other than English and Spanish were not considered. A Bayesian network was built using results from identified studies to create models that were later run through Markov Chain Monte Carlo sampling through 200000 iterations. Results: Eight RCTs compared TXA-S vs. placebo, one TXA-I vs. placebo, and one TXA-I vs. TXA-S. TXA-I had lower risk of transfusion (relative risk [RR], 0.63 [0.47,0.84], SUCRA 0.950) than TXA-S (RR 0.79 [0.65,0.95], SUCRA 0.545). TXA-I had a lower risk of complications (RR 0.38 [0.21,0.67], SUCRA=0.957) compared to TXA-S (RR 0.55 [0.39, 0.78], SUCRA 0.539). TXA-I had a lower postoperative decrease in hemoglobin (MD -1.2 [1.3, 1.0], SUCRA 0.849) compared to TXA-S (MD-0.97 [-1.0, -0.93], SUCRA 0.646]). Conclusions: TXA, regardless of the route of administration, is an effective intervention in decreasing bleeding, postoperative complications, and risk of transfusion when compared with placebo. Further studies directly comparing TXA-S to TXA-I would be useful to determine the optimal route of delivery.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
经皮肾镜碎石术中的全身氨甲环酸与灌流氨甲环酸比较
导言:经皮肾镜取石术(PCNL)是治疗巨大肾结石的金标准。PCNL 的一个潜在重大并发症是失血,这可能导致输血需求和较差的无石治疗效果。氨甲环酸(TXA)已成为一种很有前景的干预措施,在腔内泌尿学中可全身给药(TXA-S)或作为灌洗液的一部分(TXA-I)。本研究旨在通过贝叶斯网络荟萃分析,全面分析有关氨甲环酸在 PCNL 中应用的现有证据,深入了解其疗效和比较效果:2022年2月,进行了一项符合PRISMA标准的系统综述(PROSPERO注册号为CRD42021270593),以确定有关TXA作为全身治疗或灌洗液的随机对照临床试验(RCT)。除英语和西班牙语外,未考虑其他语言的研究。利用已确定研究的结果建立了贝叶斯网络,随后通过马尔可夫链蒙特卡洛采样法运行了 200000 次迭代模型:8项研究比较了TXA-S与安慰剂、1项TXA-I与安慰剂以及1项TXA-I与TXA-S。TXA-I 的输血风险(相对风险 [RR],0.63 [0.47,0.84],SUCRA 0.950)低于 TXA-S(RR 0.79 [0.65,0.95],SUCRA 0.545)。TXA-I 的并发症风险(RR 0.38 [0.21,0.67],SUCRA=0.957)低于 TXA-S(RR 0.55 [0.39,0.78],SUCRA 0.539)。与TXA-S(MD-0.97 [-1.0, -0.93],SUCRA 0.646])相比,TXA-I的术后血红蛋白下降率较低(MD-1.2 [1.3, 1.0],SUCRA 0.849):结论:与安慰剂相比,无论通过何种途径给药,TXA 都能有效减少出血、术后并发症和输血风险。直接比较 TXA-S 和 TXA-I 的进一步研究将有助于确定最佳给药途径。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
167
期刊介绍: Published by the Canadian Urological Association, the Canadian Urological Association Journal (CUAJ) released its first issue in March 2007, and was published four times that year under the guidance of founding editor (Editor Emeritus as of 2012), Dr. Laurence H. Klotz. In 2008, CUAJ became a bimonthly publication. As of 2013, articles have been published monthly, alternating between print and online-only versions (print issues are available in February, April, June, August, October, and December; online-only issues are produced in January, March, May, July, September, and November). In 2017, the journal launched an ahead-of-print publishing strategy, in which accepted manuscripts are published electronically on our website and cited on PubMed ahead of their official issue-based publication date. By significantly shortening the time to article availability, we offer our readers more flexibility in the way they engage with our content: as a continuous stream, or in a monthly “package,” or both. CUAJ covers a broad range of urological topics — oncology, pediatrics, transplantation, endourology, female urology, infertility, and more. We take pride in showcasing the work of some of Canada’s top investigators and providing our readers with the latest relevant evidence-based research, and on being the primary repository for major guidelines and other important practice recommendations. Our long-term vision is to become an essential destination for urology-based research, education, and advocacy for both physicians and patients, and to act as a springboard for discussions within the urologic community.
期刊最新文献
Safety and efficacy of ultrasound-assisted bedside ureteric stent placement 2024 Canadian Urological Association endorsement of an expert report: Kidney involvement in tuberous sclerosis complex Sacral neuromodulation in pediatric refractory bladder and bowel dysfunction Fostering the continued growth of our association On vacation
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1