Analyzing the seismic response characteristics of P-, SV-, and SH- waves to reservoir parameters using physical modeling

GEOPHYSICS Pub Date : 2024-05-21 DOI:10.1190/geo2023-0454.1
Pinbo Ding, Feng Zhang, Xiangyang Li, Y. Chai
{"title":"Analyzing the seismic response characteristics of P-, SV-, and SH- waves to reservoir parameters using physical modeling","authors":"Pinbo Ding, Feng Zhang, Xiangyang Li, Y. Chai","doi":"10.1190/geo2023-0454.1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Changes in reservoir parameters cause differences in seismic response characteristics, which can reflect changes in the formation lithology and fluids. Herein, seismic physical modeling and seismic response characteristic analysis of P-, SV-, and SH- wave fields were conducted. A seismic physical model was developed in the laboratory, which included several groups of sandstone blocks for simulating reservoir parameters, such as different fluid and clay contents. Two-dimensional wave field data of P-P, SV-SV, and SH-SH waves were acquired and processed in the laboratory. Compared with P- waves, SV- and SH- waves were insensitive to oil and air mediums and were almost unaffected by pore fluids, and the SH- stack profile was superior to the SV- stack profile. Compared with P- waves, shear waves are insensitive to fluids and are less affected by fluid saturation. The reflection events at the interface were slightly better for the SH- wave section than for the SV- wave section. The reflection coefficient of P- waves varied greatly on AVA gathers and was significantly influenced by factors, such as fluids. The variation in the SV- wave reflection coefficient on AVA gathers was not as significant as that of P- waves, and SV- and SH- wave were more conducive to identifying whether the block contained clay. The SH- wave was more reliable for seismic imaging. Overall, this study can assist in combining different seismic wave data for better hydrocarbon identification and reservoir description.","PeriodicalId":509604,"journal":{"name":"GEOPHYSICS","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"GEOPHYSICS","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1190/geo2023-0454.1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Changes in reservoir parameters cause differences in seismic response characteristics, which can reflect changes in the formation lithology and fluids. Herein, seismic physical modeling and seismic response characteristic analysis of P-, SV-, and SH- wave fields were conducted. A seismic physical model was developed in the laboratory, which included several groups of sandstone blocks for simulating reservoir parameters, such as different fluid and clay contents. Two-dimensional wave field data of P-P, SV-SV, and SH-SH waves were acquired and processed in the laboratory. Compared with P- waves, SV- and SH- waves were insensitive to oil and air mediums and were almost unaffected by pore fluids, and the SH- stack profile was superior to the SV- stack profile. Compared with P- waves, shear waves are insensitive to fluids and are less affected by fluid saturation. The reflection events at the interface were slightly better for the SH- wave section than for the SV- wave section. The reflection coefficient of P- waves varied greatly on AVA gathers and was significantly influenced by factors, such as fluids. The variation in the SV- wave reflection coefficient on AVA gathers was not as significant as that of P- waves, and SV- and SH- wave were more conducive to identifying whether the block contained clay. The SH- wave was more reliable for seismic imaging. Overall, this study can assist in combining different seismic wave data for better hydrocarbon identification and reservoir description.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
利用物理建模分析 P 波、SV 波和 SH 波对储层参数的地震响应特性
储层参数的变化会导致地震响应特征的差异,从而反映出地层岩性和流体的变化。在此,对 P 波、SV 波和 SH 波场进行了地震物理建模和地震响应特性分析。在实验室中建立了地震物理模型,其中包括几组砂岩块,用于模拟储层参数,如不同的流体和粘土含量。实验室采集并处理了 P-P、SV-SV 和 SH-SH 波的二维波场数据。与 P 波相比,SV 波和 SH 波对石油和空气介质不敏感,几乎不受孔隙流体的影响,SH 波叠加剖面优于 SV 波叠加剖面。与 P- 波相比,剪切波对流体不敏感,受流体饱和度的影响较小。SH 波剖面在界面处的反射事件略好于 SV 波剖面。P 波的反射系数在 AVA 波段上变化很大,受流体等因素的影响也很大。SV 波在 AVA 集块上的反射系数变化没有 P 波那么大,SV 波和 SH 波更有利于识别该区块是否含有粘土。在地震成像方面,SH 波更为可靠。总之,这项研究有助于结合不同的地震波数据,更好地识别油气和描述储层。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Robust unsupervised 5D seismic data reconstruction on both regular and irregular grid Effect of fluid patch clustering on the P-wave velocity-saturation relation: a critical saturation model Strategic Geosteering Workflow with Uncertainty Quantification and Deep Learning: Initial Test on the Goliat Field Data Review on 3D electromagnetic modeling and inversion for Mineral Exploration High dynamic range land wavefield reconstruction from randomized acquisition
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1