Topographic Effect on Body-Wave Polarization and Near-Surface Wave Speed Estimation

Yuanshen Li, Sunyoung Park
{"title":"Topographic Effect on Body-Wave Polarization and Near-Surface Wave Speed Estimation","authors":"Yuanshen Li, Sunyoung Park","doi":"10.1093/gji/ggae181","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n This study examines the topographic effect on the body-wave polarization and, subsequently, on near-surface wave speed estimation. We first derive 3D P- and S-wave polarization angles in the presence of ground tilt, where the angles are functions of the ground tilt orientation, the near-surface wave speeds, and the incident wave direction. We find that S-wave polarization angle varies considerably (e.g., more than 100 %) when the incident angle is close to the critical angle. The counter-intuitive phenomenon for flat surface, that is, P-wave polarization being only sensitive to S- but not P-wave speeds, breaks down in the presence of ground tilt, i.e., P-wave polarization becomes sensitive to both P- and S-wave speeds. Examining the differences in the inferred wave speeds with and without the flat-surface assumption reveals that bias in wave speed estimates is, in general, higher for smaller incident angles, e.g., about 50 % or higher for a 15○ ground tilt and near-vertical (<5○) incidence. The effect on P-wave speed estimates is also significant when the S-wave incident angle approaches the critical angle. In order to investigate the topographic effect on wave speed estimates inferred using teleseismic polarization data, we revisit the near-surface wave speeds estimates at Hi-net stations from Park and Ishii (2018). Based on the ground tilt and strike angles measured at 300-m scale for each Hi-net site, we constrain P- and S-wave speeds utilizing the P-wave polarization data. We find that P-wave polarization data alone can effectively constrain not only S- but also P-wave speeds, especially when the ground tilt is sufficiently large (e.g., >5○). Furthermore, our additional test suggests that including S-wave polarization data with the tilt consideration will improve the near-surface wave speeds estimates significantly compared to when the tilt effect is ignored.","PeriodicalId":502458,"journal":{"name":"Geophysical Journal International","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Geophysical Journal International","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/gji/ggae181","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study examines the topographic effect on the body-wave polarization and, subsequently, on near-surface wave speed estimation. We first derive 3D P- and S-wave polarization angles in the presence of ground tilt, where the angles are functions of the ground tilt orientation, the near-surface wave speeds, and the incident wave direction. We find that S-wave polarization angle varies considerably (e.g., more than 100 %) when the incident angle is close to the critical angle. The counter-intuitive phenomenon for flat surface, that is, P-wave polarization being only sensitive to S- but not P-wave speeds, breaks down in the presence of ground tilt, i.e., P-wave polarization becomes sensitive to both P- and S-wave speeds. Examining the differences in the inferred wave speeds with and without the flat-surface assumption reveals that bias in wave speed estimates is, in general, higher for smaller incident angles, e.g., about 50 % or higher for a 15○ ground tilt and near-vertical (<5○) incidence. The effect on P-wave speed estimates is also significant when the S-wave incident angle approaches the critical angle. In order to investigate the topographic effect on wave speed estimates inferred using teleseismic polarization data, we revisit the near-surface wave speeds estimates at Hi-net stations from Park and Ishii (2018). Based on the ground tilt and strike angles measured at 300-m scale for each Hi-net site, we constrain P- and S-wave speeds utilizing the P-wave polarization data. We find that P-wave polarization data alone can effectively constrain not only S- but also P-wave speeds, especially when the ground tilt is sufficiently large (e.g., >5○). Furthermore, our additional test suggests that including S-wave polarization data with the tilt consideration will improve the near-surface wave speeds estimates significantly compared to when the tilt effect is ignored.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
地形对体波极化和近表面波速估算的影响
本研究探讨了地形对体波极化的影响,以及随后对近表面波速度估算的影响。我们首先推导了地面倾斜情况下的三维 P 波和 S 波极化角,其中极化角是地面倾斜方向、近地表波速和入射波方向的函数。我们发现,当入射角接近临界角时,S 波极化角变化很大(例如,超过 100%)。在地表平坦的情况下,P 波极化只对 S 波速度敏感,而对 P 波速度不敏感,这种与直觉相反的现象在地面倾斜的情况下被打破,即 P 波极化对 P 波和 S 波速度都变得敏感。通过研究使用和不使用平坦表面假设时推断波速的差异,可以发现,一般来说,入射角度越小,波速估计值的偏差就越大,例如,地面倾斜度为 15○和接近垂直(5○)时,偏差约为 50%或更高。此外,我们的附加测试表明,与忽略倾斜效应时相比,将 S 波极化数据与倾斜考虑在一起将显著提高近地表波速估计值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Waveform modeling of hydroacoustic teleseismic earthquake records from autonomous Mermaid floats Real-Time Dual-Parameter Full-Waveform Inversion of GPR Data Based on Robust Deep Learning Graph-learning approach to combine multiresolution seismic velocity models An iterative weighted least square fitting method for crustal anisotropy using receiver functions Electrical conductivity of the suboceanic upper mantle constrained by satellite-derived tidal magnetic fields: 3-D inversion, validation and interpretation
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1