Acoustic wave simulation in strongly heterogeneous models using a discontinuous Galerkin method

GEOPHYSICS Pub Date : 2024-05-20 DOI:10.1190/geo2023-0525.1
Wenzhong Cao, Wei Zhang, Weitao Wang
{"title":"Acoustic wave simulation in strongly heterogeneous models using a discontinuous Galerkin method","authors":"Wenzhong Cao, Wei Zhang, Weitao Wang","doi":"10.1190/geo2023-0525.1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In recent years, the discontinuous Galerkin method (DGM) has been rapidly developed for the numerical simulation of seismic waves. For wavefield propagation between two adjacent elements, it is common practice to apply a numerical flux to the boundary of each element to propagate waves between adjacent elements. Several fluxes, including the center, penalty, Local Lax–Friedrich (LLF), upwind, and Rankine–Hugoniot jump condition-based (RH-condition) fluxes are widely used in numerical seismic wave simulation. However, some fluxes do not account for media differences between adjacent elements. Although different fluxes have been successfully used in DGM for many velocity models, it is unclear whether they can produce sufficiently accurate or stable results for strongly heterogeneous models, such as checkerboard models commonly used in tomographic studies. We test different fluxes using the acoustic wave equation. We analyzed the accuracy of the penalty, LLF, upwind, and RH-condition fluxes based on the results of the numerical simulations of the homogeneous and two-layer models. We conducted simulations using checkerboard models, and the results indicated that the LLF, penalty, and upwind fluxes may have instability problems in heterogeneous models with long-time simulations. We observed instability issues in the LLF, penalty, and upwind fluxes when the wave-impedance contrast was high at the media interface. However, the results of RH-condition flux remained consistently stable. The series of numerical examples presented in this work provide insights into the characteristics and application of fluxes for seismic wave modeling.","PeriodicalId":509604,"journal":{"name":"GEOPHYSICS","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"GEOPHYSICS","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1190/geo2023-0525.1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In recent years, the discontinuous Galerkin method (DGM) has been rapidly developed for the numerical simulation of seismic waves. For wavefield propagation between two adjacent elements, it is common practice to apply a numerical flux to the boundary of each element to propagate waves between adjacent elements. Several fluxes, including the center, penalty, Local Lax–Friedrich (LLF), upwind, and Rankine–Hugoniot jump condition-based (RH-condition) fluxes are widely used in numerical seismic wave simulation. However, some fluxes do not account for media differences between adjacent elements. Although different fluxes have been successfully used in DGM for many velocity models, it is unclear whether they can produce sufficiently accurate or stable results for strongly heterogeneous models, such as checkerboard models commonly used in tomographic studies. We test different fluxes using the acoustic wave equation. We analyzed the accuracy of the penalty, LLF, upwind, and RH-condition fluxes based on the results of the numerical simulations of the homogeneous and two-layer models. We conducted simulations using checkerboard models, and the results indicated that the LLF, penalty, and upwind fluxes may have instability problems in heterogeneous models with long-time simulations. We observed instability issues in the LLF, penalty, and upwind fluxes when the wave-impedance contrast was high at the media interface. However, the results of RH-condition flux remained consistently stable. The series of numerical examples presented in this work provide insights into the characteristics and application of fluxes for seismic wave modeling.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
使用非连续伽勒金方法模拟强异质模型中的声波
近年来,用于地震波数值模拟的非连续伽勒金方法(DGM)得到了迅速发展。对于相邻两个元素之间的波场传播,通常的做法是在每个元素的边界上应用数值通量来传播相邻元素之间的波。有几种通量,包括中心通量、惩罚通量、Local LaxFriedrich(LLF)通量、上风通量和基于朗金-胡戈尼奥特跃迁条件(RH-condition)的通量被广泛应用于地震波数值模拟。然而,有些通量没有考虑相邻元素之间的介质差异。尽管不同的通量已成功用于许多速度模型的 DGM,但对于强异质模型(如层析成像研究中常用的棋盘模型),这些通量能否产生足够准确或稳定的结果尚不清楚。我们使用声波方程测试了不同的通量。我们根据均质模型和两层模型的数值模拟结果,分析了惩罚通量、LLF 通量、上风通量和 RH 条件通量的准确性。我们使用棋盘模型进行了模拟,结果表明,在长时间模拟的异质模型中,LLF、惩罚和上风通量可能存在不稳定问题。当介质界面的波阻抗对比度较高时,我们观察到 LLF、惩罚和上风通量存在不稳定问题。然而,RH 条件通量的结果始终保持稳定。本研究中介绍的一系列数值示例为地震波建模中通量的特性和应用提供了启示。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Robust unsupervised 5D seismic data reconstruction on both regular and irregular grid Effect of fluid patch clustering on the P-wave velocity-saturation relation: a critical saturation model Strategic Geosteering Workflow with Uncertainty Quantification and Deep Learning: Initial Test on the Goliat Field Data Review on 3D electromagnetic modeling and inversion for Mineral Exploration High dynamic range land wavefield reconstruction from randomized acquisition
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1