SEX DIFFERENCES IN THE CORONARY SYSTEM OF THE HUMAN HEART

Abstract

The aim of this study is to investigate sex differences in the coronary system of the heart, considering all relevant consequence, and to compile and analyze the gathered data. Materials and Methods. The authors independently conducted a literature search and selection process using the PubMed database for the review, followed by the generalization of the obtained data. Results. Women exhibit a higher propensity than men for certain cardiovascular diseases, including persistent angina, non-obstructive coronary heart disease, coronary microvascular dysfunction, spontaneous coronary artery dissection, stress cardiomyopathy, and heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF). In comparison to men, women typically present with elevated rates of underlying comorbidities, encompassing not only advanced age but also hypertension, diabetes mellitus, obesity, chronic renal failure, peripheral vascular disease, HFpEF, and inflammatory conditions like rheumatoid arthritis. Many of these conditions are linked to diffuse atherosclerosis and microvascular ischemia, with notable parallels between non-obstructive coronary heart disease and coronary microvascular dysfunction. Special attention is paid to patients sharing an increased risk of coronary heart disease events, which is consistent between women and men, except for those with severe coronary flow reserve (CFR) impairment, where women demonstrate an even higher risk. In particular, in cases where CFR impairment is not attributable to obstructive coronary heart disease (precluding revascularization to mitigate cardiovascular risk), there may be justification for a novel therapeutic approach for systemic coronary heart disease management. Cases of severe coronary microvascular dysfunction, often concurrent with non-obstructive coronary heart disease, may indicate a shared mechanism influencing coronary heart disease risk in both genders. This mechanism might involve inflammation, endothelial dysfunction, and heightened cardiomyocyte oxygen demand, culminating in microvascular ischemia, myocardial injury, and compromised cardiac function. Conclusions. Enhanced comprehension of the interplay between coronary vasomotor dysfunction and the concomitance of coronary heart disease with other conditions, such as insulin resistance and heart failure, could foster the advancement of novel systemic treatments aimed at leveraging “complete revascularization” more effectively.