Self-initiated protection behavior based on Magna Carta of women: Women health workers, teachers, and minimum-wage earners in the workplace

Jason V. Chavez, Atty. Marti W. Gregorio, Aracelie L. Araneta, M. Asiri, Darwisa S. Sayadi, Fatima Shaira Jaafar-Balla, Marialyn B. Vicente, Kaiser Isham Sabdani Savellon
{"title":"Self-initiated protection behavior based on Magna Carta of women: Women health workers, teachers, and minimum-wage earners in the workplace","authors":"Jason V. Chavez, Atty. Marti W. Gregorio, Aracelie L. Araneta, M. Asiri, Darwisa S. Sayadi, Fatima Shaira Jaafar-Balla, Marialyn B. Vicente, Kaiser Isham Sabdani Savellon","doi":"10.59429/esp.v9i7.2363","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The problem of violence in the workplace continues to expand and it casts a shadow on organizational environments all around the world. This phenomenon extends to different fields or sectors and is pervasive throughout a wide range of job environments, such as those in the healthcare industry, educational institutions, local and informal economies, and service industries. The purpose of this study was to analyze the actions of working women when their rights had been/will be violated. This quantitative study was conducted in Zamboanga Peninsula, Philippines among women in academe (n=121) and health institutions (n=39), and women of minimum-wage earners (n=42). Findings indicated that working women in the region tend to seek information outside their organizations when violence will happen; they also seek information when their rights once were violated. In some instances, they would only file a complaint when they feel discriminated against and when equal rights in the workplace are not well implemented. Notably, minimum-wage earners and health workers are more likely to file a complaint than teachers. The findings resonate with broader societal patterns wherein hesitancy to report workplace violations are deeply embedded. Such behaviors perpetuate gender-based violence and hinder the development of gender-sensitive and conducive workplaces. To deconstruct the gender and development (GAD) limitations, interventions need to extend beyond the present organizational policies to instill a culture of empowerment and safety for all individuals, fostering an environment conducive to open discussions, proactive conflict resolution mechanisms, and reliable report systems.","PeriodicalId":502744,"journal":{"name":"Environment and Social Psychology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environment and Social Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.59429/esp.v9i7.2363","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The problem of violence in the workplace continues to expand and it casts a shadow on organizational environments all around the world. This phenomenon extends to different fields or sectors and is pervasive throughout a wide range of job environments, such as those in the healthcare industry, educational institutions, local and informal economies, and service industries. The purpose of this study was to analyze the actions of working women when their rights had been/will be violated. This quantitative study was conducted in Zamboanga Peninsula, Philippines among women in academe (n=121) and health institutions (n=39), and women of minimum-wage earners (n=42). Findings indicated that working women in the region tend to seek information outside their organizations when violence will happen; they also seek information when their rights once were violated. In some instances, they would only file a complaint when they feel discriminated against and when equal rights in the workplace are not well implemented. Notably, minimum-wage earners and health workers are more likely to file a complaint than teachers. The findings resonate with broader societal patterns wherein hesitancy to report workplace violations are deeply embedded. Such behaviors perpetuate gender-based violence and hinder the development of gender-sensitive and conducive workplaces. To deconstruct the gender and development (GAD) limitations, interventions need to extend beyond the present organizational policies to instill a culture of empowerment and safety for all individuals, fostering an environment conducive to open discussions, proactive conflict resolution mechanisms, and reliable report systems.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
基于妇女大宪章的自发保护行为:工作场所的女卫生工作者、女教师和最低工资劳动者
工作场所的暴力问题不断扩大,给世界各地的组织环境蒙上了阴影。这种现象延伸到不同的领域或部门,在广泛的工作环境中普遍存在,如医疗保健行业、教育机构、地方和非正规经济以及服务行业。本研究的目的是分析职业女性在其权利受到/将要受到侵犯时采取的行动。这项定量研究在菲律宾三宝颜半岛进行,研究对象包括学术界(121 人)和医疗机构(39 人)的妇女,以及最低工资妇女(42 人)。调查结果表明,当暴力事件发生时,该地区的职业妇女倾向于在其组织之外寻求信息;当她们的权利受到侵犯时,她们也会寻求信息。在某些情况下,只有当她们感到受到歧视以及工作场所的平等权利没有得到很好落实时,她们才会提出投诉。值得注意的是,最低工资劳动者和医务工作者比教师更有可能提出投诉。这些发现与更广泛的社会模式产生了共鸣,即对报告工作场所侵权行为犹豫不决的现象根深蒂固。这种行为使性别暴力长期存在,并阻碍了对性别问题有敏感认识的、有利的工作场所的发展。为了打破性别与发展(GAD)的限制,干预措施需要超越目前的组织政策,为所有人灌输一种赋权和安全的文化,营造一种有利于公开讨论、积极主动的冲突解决机制和可靠的报告制度的环境。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Behavior shift through non-traditional math teaching strategies integrating real-life transactions for non-math enthusiasts Attractive appearance, future wealth! How exposure to visual wealth on social media contributes to female self-objectification ‘Heavy’ life satisfaction: Unveiling the intricate relationships between obesity and well-being in Abu Dhabi Problem-solving skills of Sulu State College freshmen students in flexible learning education: An assessment Awareness and implementation confidence of free higher education program under UNIFAST among HEIs in Sulu, Philippines
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1