Unvaccinated employees during Covid-19 emergency: Debating the Italian labour court referral

Abstract

This contribution examines the inadmissibility of a preliminary reference order submitted by the Court of Padua, Italy to the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU). The case involved the suspension of a worker, who, while legally obliged, declined to have the Covid-19 vaccine. The Italian court temporarily halted proceedings initiated by the worker's appeal. The author provides a comprehensive analysis facts of the case, the applicable national legislation, and the content of the preliminary reference order. The order scrutinised the compatibility of the conditional authorisation issued by the European Commission for the release of vaccines in circulation at that time. Additionally, it explored potential discrimination against workers who, by refusing vaccination, faced suspension from work without pay, as per explicit legal provisions. The contribution concludes by addressing the specific details of the inadmissibility ruling from the CJEU. Case: Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 13 July 2023. D. M. v Azienda Ospedale-Università di Padova. Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunale Ordinario di Padova. Reference for a preliminary ruling – Public health – National legislation imposing a vaccination obligation on health professionals – Suspension from duty without pay for personnel refusing the vaccine – Regulation (EC) No 726/2004 – Medicinal products for human use – Vaccines against Covid-19 – Regulation (EC) No 507/2006 – Validity of conditional marketing authorisations – Regulation (EU) 2021/953 – Prohibition of discrimination between vaccinated and unvaccinated persons – Inadmissibility.