The 90% minimum effective concentration of ropivacaine for ultrasound‐guided interscalene brachial plexus block in children aged 1–10 years: A biased coin design up‐and‐down sequential allocation trial

Li Yang, Fei Yang, Yaqiong Tian, Ling Liu, Shangyingying Li, Tauseef Ahmad, Yuan Shi, Shengfen Tu
{"title":"The 90% minimum effective concentration of ropivacaine for ultrasound‐guided interscalene brachial plexus block in children aged 1–10 years: A biased coin design up‐and‐down sequential allocation trial","authors":"Li Yang, Fei Yang, Yaqiong Tian, Ling Liu, Shangyingying Li, Tauseef Ahmad, Yuan Shi, Shengfen Tu","doi":"10.1002/pdi3.82","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Ropivacaine is a commonly used local anesthetic for brachial plexus blocks in children, but the minimum effective dose of ropivacaine for interscalene brachial plexus blocks has not been reported. The aim of this study was to determine the 90% minimum effective concentration (MEC90) of ropivacaine for an ultrasound‐guided interscalene brachial plexus block (ISB). A total of 155 patients, aged from 1 to 10 years, underwent unilateral surgical procedures on areas of the upper extremity not innervated by the ulnar nerve. The biased coin design up‐and‐down sequential method (BCD‐UMD) was used to determine the MEC90 of ropivacaine for ultrasound‐guided ISB. In our study, the initial concentration of ropivacaine was 0.07% in the toddler group and 0.09% in the preschool and school‐age groups. During the trial, the concentration of ropivacaine for each subsequent patient was determined by the blocking effect of the previous patient. In case of failure, the concentration for the next patient was increased by 0.01%. Otherwise, the concentration was either decreased by 0.01%, with a probability of 0.11, or kept the same, with a probability of 0.89. Overall, the MEC90 of ropivacaine was 0.104% (95% confidence interval (CI), 0.070%–0.106%) in the toddler group, 0.114% (95% CI, 0.090%–0.117%) in the preschool group, and 0.133% (95% CI, 0.099%–0.136%) in the school‐age group. No adverse events occurred. Our study showed that lower concentrations of ropivacaine could provide effective nerve blocks and reduce the risk of local anesthetics.","PeriodicalId":498028,"journal":{"name":"Pediatric Discovery","volume":"63 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pediatric Discovery","FirstCategoryId":"0","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/pdi3.82","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Ropivacaine is a commonly used local anesthetic for brachial plexus blocks in children, but the minimum effective dose of ropivacaine for interscalene brachial plexus blocks has not been reported. The aim of this study was to determine the 90% minimum effective concentration (MEC90) of ropivacaine for an ultrasound‐guided interscalene brachial plexus block (ISB). A total of 155 patients, aged from 1 to 10 years, underwent unilateral surgical procedures on areas of the upper extremity not innervated by the ulnar nerve. The biased coin design up‐and‐down sequential method (BCD‐UMD) was used to determine the MEC90 of ropivacaine for ultrasound‐guided ISB. In our study, the initial concentration of ropivacaine was 0.07% in the toddler group and 0.09% in the preschool and school‐age groups. During the trial, the concentration of ropivacaine for each subsequent patient was determined by the blocking effect of the previous patient. In case of failure, the concentration for the next patient was increased by 0.01%. Otherwise, the concentration was either decreased by 0.01%, with a probability of 0.11, or kept the same, with a probability of 0.89. Overall, the MEC90 of ropivacaine was 0.104% (95% confidence interval (CI), 0.070%–0.106%) in the toddler group, 0.114% (95% CI, 0.090%–0.117%) in the preschool group, and 0.133% (95% CI, 0.099%–0.136%) in the school‐age group. No adverse events occurred. Our study showed that lower concentrations of ropivacaine could provide effective nerve blocks and reduce the risk of local anesthetics.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
1-10 岁儿童在超声引导下进行椎间臂丛阻滞时,罗哌卡因的 90% 最低有效浓度:偏向硬币设计的上下顺序分配试验
罗哌卡因是一种常用于儿童臂丛神经阻滞的局麻药,但用于桡侧臂丛神经阻滞的罗哌卡因最低有效剂量尚未见报道。本研究旨在确定超声引导下桡侧臂丛间阻滞(ISB)的罗哌卡因 90% 最低有效浓度(MEC90)。共有 155 名年龄在 1 到 10 岁之间的患者接受了单侧外科手术,手术部位为上肢未受尺神经支配的区域。研究采用偏向硬币设计上下顺序法(BCD-UMD)确定了超声引导 ISB 中罗哌卡因的 MEC90。在我们的研究中,幼儿组的罗哌卡因初始浓度为 0.07%,学龄前组和学龄组为 0.09%。在试验过程中,根据前一位患者的阻滞效果来决定之后每位患者的罗哌卡因浓度。如果失败,下一位患者的浓度增加 0.01%。否则,浓度要么降低 0.01%(概率为 0.11),要么保持不变(概率为 0.89)。总体而言,幼儿组罗哌卡因的 MEC90 为 0.104%(95% 置信区间 (CI),0.070%-0.106%),学龄前组为 0.114%(95% CI,0.090%-0.117%),学龄组为 0.133%(95% CI,0.099%-0.136%)。未发生任何不良事件。我们的研究表明,较低浓度的罗哌卡因可提供有效的神经阻滞,并降低局麻药的风险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
High infection rates and risk‐adapted prevention strategies in contemporary pediatric allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation Improved outcomes of pediatric patients with swallowing disorders through a multidisciplinary dysphagia clinic in a tertiary care children's hospital in Colombia SOX9 regulates epithelial‐mesenchymal transformation by mediating the Wnt/β‐catenin signaling pathway in hypospadias Assessing early left ventricular remodeling in pediatric hypertension: A study using transthoracic echocardiography combined with two‐dimensional speckle tracking echocardiography in an immature rabbit model Causal association of metabolic syndrome with chronic kidney disease progression: A Mendelian randomization study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1