Experimental Study on Flexural Performance of lap-spliced and mechanical-spliced (clamp type) rebars in RC Beams

IF 0.8 Q4 ENGINEERING, CIVIL Electronic Journal of Structural Engineering Pub Date : 2024-05-19 DOI:10.56748/ejse.24537
͏. Jafar, Hariadi Yulianto, Zaneta Ambarwati, M. F. Musyaffa
{"title":"Experimental Study on Flexural Performance of lap-spliced and mechanical-spliced (clamp type) rebars in RC Beams","authors":"͏. Jafar, Hariadi Yulianto, Zaneta Ambarwati, M. F. Musyaffa","doi":"10.56748/ejse.24537","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Various methods can be employed to splice reinforcement bars, including lap splicing, welding, and mechanical splicing. Lap splicing is the most used method among these techniques. However, this study primarily focuses on evaluating the potential of mechanical splicing to replace the lap splice method. The investigation involved assessing the flexural performance of six RC beams in a series of laboratory experiments. These beams represented a control beam, an RC beam with lap-spliced rebars, and an RC beam with clamp-type mechanical spliced rebars. The laboratory testing results indicated that the RC beam with lap-spliced rebars had the highest load-bearing capacity, resulting in the highest nominal flexural moment (Mn). In contrast, the control beam demonstrated the highest deflection, signifying a greater level of ductility. However, RC beams with mechanical splices (clamp type), while not achieving the highest flexural moment and ductilities, are still competitive, as the experiment revealed that the difference is not significant. Consequently, it can be concluded that mechanical splicing has the potential to compete with or replace lap splicing in RC beams.","PeriodicalId":52513,"journal":{"name":"Electronic Journal of Structural Engineering","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Electronic Journal of Structural Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.56748/ejse.24537","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CIVIL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Various methods can be employed to splice reinforcement bars, including lap splicing, welding, and mechanical splicing. Lap splicing is the most used method among these techniques. However, this study primarily focuses on evaluating the potential of mechanical splicing to replace the lap splice method. The investigation involved assessing the flexural performance of six RC beams in a series of laboratory experiments. These beams represented a control beam, an RC beam with lap-spliced rebars, and an RC beam with clamp-type mechanical spliced rebars. The laboratory testing results indicated that the RC beam with lap-spliced rebars had the highest load-bearing capacity, resulting in the highest nominal flexural moment (Mn). In contrast, the control beam demonstrated the highest deflection, signifying a greater level of ductility. However, RC beams with mechanical splices (clamp type), while not achieving the highest flexural moment and ductilities, are still competitive, as the experiment revealed that the difference is not significant. Consequently, it can be concluded that mechanical splicing has the potential to compete with or replace lap splicing in RC beams.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
关于钢筋混凝土梁中搭接钢筋和机械拼接钢筋(夹钳式)挠曲性能的实验研究
钢筋的拼接有多种方法,包括搭接、焊接和机械拼接。在这些技术中,搭接是最常用的方法。不过,本研究主要侧重于评估机械拼接取代搭接法的潜力。调查包括在一系列实验室实验中评估六根 RC 梁的抗弯性能。这些梁分别为对照梁、采用搭接钢筋的 RC 梁和采用夹钳式机械拼接钢筋的 RC 梁。实验室测试结果表明,采用搭接钢筋的 RC 梁具有最高的承载能力,从而产生了最高的名义弯曲力矩(Mn)。相比之下,对照梁的挠度最大,表明其延展性更强。然而,采用机械拼接(夹钳式)的 RC 梁虽然没有达到最高的挠曲力矩和延展性,但仍然具有竞争力,因为实验表明两者之间的差异并不显著。因此,可以得出结论,在 RC 梁中,机械拼接具有与搭接拼接竞争或取代搭接拼接的潜力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Electronic Journal of Structural Engineering
Electronic Journal of Structural Engineering Engineering-Civil and Structural Engineering
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
16.70%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: The Electronic Journal of Structural Engineering (EJSE) is an international forum for the dissemination and discussion of leading edge research and practical applications in Structural Engineering. It comprises peer-reviewed technical papers, discussions and comments, and also news about conferences, workshops etc. in Structural Engineering. Original papers are invited from individuals involved in the field of structural engineering and construction. The areas of special interests include the following, but are not limited to: Analytical and design methods Bridges and High-rise Buildings Case studies and failure investigation Innovations in design and new technology New Construction Materials Performance of Structures Prefabrication Technology Repairs, Strengthening, and Maintenance Stability and Scaffolding Engineering Soil-structure interaction Standards and Codes of Practice Structural and solid mechanics Structural Safety and Reliability Testing Technologies Vibration, impact and structural dynamics Wind and earthquake engineering. EJSE is seeking original papers (research or state-of the art reviews) of the highest quality for consideration for publication. The papers will be published within 3 to 6 months. The papers are expected to make a significant contribution to the research and development activities of the academic and professional engineering community.
期刊最新文献
Experimental Study on Flexural Performance of lap-spliced and mechanical-spliced (clamp type) rebars in RC Beams Examining ACI Development Length and Strength Provisions for RC Slabs Strengthened with NSM GFRP Impact of composite and aluminium face sheets on the properties of the 3D-printed cores under quasi-static three-point bending Evaluation of the dynamic additional impact about foundation pit construction on the existing adjacent subway station with the PBA method Seismic Assessment of High-Rise Buildings Having Transfer Elements
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1