Detection frequency and duration of circulating antiphospholipid syndrome markers in patients with verified COVID-19

Yu. V. Mikhailova, N. V. Chepurchenko, A. P. Obriadina
{"title":"Detection frequency and duration of circulating antiphospholipid syndrome markers in patients with verified COVID-19","authors":"Yu. V. Mikhailova, N. V. Chepurchenko, A. P. Obriadina","doi":"10.17749/2313-7347/ob.gyn.rep.2024.504","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"   Aim: to develop enzyme-linked immunosorbent tests for assessing the antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) markers and determine prevalence of three antiphospholipid antibody (aPL) types at different COVID-19 stages.   Materials and Methods. A comparative longitudinal controlled study was conducted by examining 120 subjects with COVID-19 diagnosis verified by reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction. Donor serum samples collected before November 2019 were used as a control group. The laboratory study included measurement of IgA, IgM and IgG against β2-glycoprotein 1 (β2-GP1), cardiolipin, phosphatidylserine-prothrombin complex (PS-PT) by using domestically produced test systems based on indirect two-step enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay.   Results. Validation of the developed experimental tests was carried out in comparison with foreign commercial analogues in accordance with international standards. Alternative antigenic targets for effective diagnosis of antibodies against β2-GP1 were studied. Analyzing rate of aPL in patients at different COVID-19 stages showed that in acute vs. convalescence stage it was higher by 1.3-fold (81.7 and 65.0 %, respectively). The first rank detection place was assigned to IgG against β2-GP1, cardiolipin and PS-PT, the second – IgM against cardiolipin. The profile of the detected antibodies changed at various COVID-19 stages driven by time frame elapsed from the moment of diagnosis.   Conclusion. Recombinant constructs are created and analytical conditions are optimized for determining various aPL types. It was shown that along with other viral infections, COVID-19 triggers autoantibody production demonstrating that 54.2 % individuals infected with SARS-CoV-2 were positive at least for one autoantibody type. The majority of such virus-associated aPL are presumably transiently positive.","PeriodicalId":36521,"journal":{"name":"Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproduction","volume":"104 24","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproduction","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17749/2313-7347/ob.gyn.rep.2024.504","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

   Aim: to develop enzyme-linked immunosorbent tests for assessing the antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) markers and determine prevalence of three antiphospholipid antibody (aPL) types at different COVID-19 stages.   Materials and Methods. A comparative longitudinal controlled study was conducted by examining 120 subjects with COVID-19 diagnosis verified by reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction. Donor serum samples collected before November 2019 were used as a control group. The laboratory study included measurement of IgA, IgM and IgG against β2-glycoprotein 1 (β2-GP1), cardiolipin, phosphatidylserine-prothrombin complex (PS-PT) by using domestically produced test systems based on indirect two-step enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay.   Results. Validation of the developed experimental tests was carried out in comparison with foreign commercial analogues in accordance with international standards. Alternative antigenic targets for effective diagnosis of antibodies against β2-GP1 were studied. Analyzing rate of aPL in patients at different COVID-19 stages showed that in acute vs. convalescence stage it was higher by 1.3-fold (81.7 and 65.0 %, respectively). The first rank detection place was assigned to IgG against β2-GP1, cardiolipin and PS-PT, the second – IgM against cardiolipin. The profile of the detected antibodies changed at various COVID-19 stages driven by time frame elapsed from the moment of diagnosis.   Conclusion. Recombinant constructs are created and analytical conditions are optimized for determining various aPL types. It was shown that along with other viral infections, COVID-19 triggers autoantibody production demonstrating that 54.2 % individuals infected with SARS-CoV-2 were positive at least for one autoantibody type. The majority of such virus-associated aPL are presumably transiently positive.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
经证实的 COVID-19 患者体内循环抗磷脂综合征标记物的检测频率和持续时间
目的:开发用于评估抗磷脂综合征(APS)标记物的酶联免疫吸附试验,并确定 COVID-19 不同阶段三种抗磷脂抗体(aPL)类型的流行率。 材料和方法。通过对 120 名经逆转录聚合酶链反应确诊为 COVID-19 的受试者进行了纵向对照比较研究。2019年11月之前采集的捐献者血清样本作为对照组。实验室研究包括使用基于间接两步酶联免疫吸附试验的国产检测系统,检测针对β2-糖蛋白1(β2-GP1)、心磷脂、磷脂酰丝氨酸-凝血酶原复合物(PS-PT)的IgA、IgM和IgG。 结果。通过与符合国际标准的国外商用类似物进行比较,对所开发的实验测试进行了验证。研究了有效诊断β2-GP1抗体的替代抗原靶标。对处于COVID-19不同阶段的患者的aPL率进行的分析表明,急性期与恢复期相比,aPL率高出1.3倍(分别为81.7%和65.0%)。针对β2-GP1、心磷脂和PS-PT的IgG检测排名第一,针对心磷脂的IgM检测排名第二。在COVID-19的不同阶段,检测到的抗体情况会随着诊断时间的推移而发生变化。 结论为确定各种类型的 aPL,创建了重组构建体并优化了分析条件。结果表明,与其他病毒感染一样,COVID-19 也会引发自身抗体的产生,54.2% 的 SARS-CoV-2 感染者至少有一种自身抗体呈阳性。大多数与病毒相关的自身抗体可能是短暂阳性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
68
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊最新文献
Immunological testing for female infertility: a modern view on the problem Septic shock in obstetrics: the role of efferent techniques for endotoxin removal in Gram-negative sepsis Surfactant lung lavage in neonatal meconium aspiration syndrome as a life-saving respiratory strategy: literature review and a case report Maternal death in world literature Primary hyperparathyroidism in pregnancy after in vitro fertilization
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1