Outcome of Transjugular Intrahepatic Portosystemic Shunt in Patients with Cirrhosis and Refractory Hepatic Hydrothorax: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

S. Giri, R. Patel, T. Tripathy, Mansingh Chaudhary, P. Anirvan, Swati Chauhan, Mitali Madhumita Rath, M. K. Panigrahi
{"title":"Outcome of Transjugular Intrahepatic Portosystemic Shunt in Patients with Cirrhosis and Refractory Hepatic Hydrothorax: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis","authors":"S. Giri, R. Patel, T. Tripathy, Mansingh Chaudhary, P. Anirvan, Swati Chauhan, Mitali Madhumita Rath, M. K. Panigrahi","doi":"10.1055/s-0044-1786828","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Background Around 5% of patients with cirrhosis of the liver develop hepatic hydrothorax (HH). For patients with refractory HH (RHH), transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) has been investigated in small studies. Hence, the present meta-analysis aimed to summarize the current data on the outcome of TIPS in patients with RHH.\n Methods From inception through June 2023, MEDLINE, Embase, and Scopus were searched for studies analyzing the outcome of TIPS in RHH. Clinical response, adverse events (AEs), mortality, and shunt dysfunction were the primary outcomes assessed. The event rates with their 95% confidence interval were calculated using a random-effects model.\n Results A total of 12 studies (n = 466) were included in the final analysis. The pooled complete and partial response rates were 47.2% (35.8–58.5%) and 25.5% (16.7–34.3%), respectively. The pooled incidences of serious AEs and post-TIPS liver failure after TIPS in RHH were 5.6% (2.1–9.0%) and 7.6% (3.1–12.1%), respectively. The pooled incidences of overall hepatic encephalopathy (HE) and severe HE nonresponsive to standard treatment after TIPS in RHH were 33.2% (20.0–46.4%) and 3.6% (0.4–6.8%), respectively. The pooled 1-month and 1-year mortality rates were 14.0% (8.3–19.6%) and 42.0% (33.5–50.4%), respectively. The pooled incidence of shunt dysfunction after TIPS in RHH was 24.2% (16.3–32.2%).\n Conclusion RHH has a modest response to TIPS in patients with cirrhosis, with only half having a complete response. Further studies are required to ascertain whether early TIPS can improve the outcome of patients with cirrhosis and HH.","PeriodicalId":506648,"journal":{"name":"Indian Journal of Radiology and Imaging","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Indian Journal of Radiology and Imaging","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0044-1786828","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background Around 5% of patients with cirrhosis of the liver develop hepatic hydrothorax (HH). For patients with refractory HH (RHH), transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) has been investigated in small studies. Hence, the present meta-analysis aimed to summarize the current data on the outcome of TIPS in patients with RHH. Methods From inception through June 2023, MEDLINE, Embase, and Scopus were searched for studies analyzing the outcome of TIPS in RHH. Clinical response, adverse events (AEs), mortality, and shunt dysfunction were the primary outcomes assessed. The event rates with their 95% confidence interval were calculated using a random-effects model. Results A total of 12 studies (n = 466) were included in the final analysis. The pooled complete and partial response rates were 47.2% (35.8–58.5%) and 25.5% (16.7–34.3%), respectively. The pooled incidences of serious AEs and post-TIPS liver failure after TIPS in RHH were 5.6% (2.1–9.0%) and 7.6% (3.1–12.1%), respectively. The pooled incidences of overall hepatic encephalopathy (HE) and severe HE nonresponsive to standard treatment after TIPS in RHH were 33.2% (20.0–46.4%) and 3.6% (0.4–6.8%), respectively. The pooled 1-month and 1-year mortality rates were 14.0% (8.3–19.6%) and 42.0% (33.5–50.4%), respectively. The pooled incidence of shunt dysfunction after TIPS in RHH was 24.2% (16.3–32.2%). Conclusion RHH has a modest response to TIPS in patients with cirrhosis, with only half having a complete response. Further studies are required to ascertain whether early TIPS can improve the outcome of patients with cirrhosis and HH.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
肝硬化和难治性肝积水患者经颈静脉肝内门体分流术的疗效:系统回顾和 Meta 分析
背景约有 5%的肝硬化患者会出现肝积水(HHH)。对于难治性肝积水(RHH)患者,经颈静脉肝内门体系统分流术(TIPS)已在一些小规模研究中得到探讨。因此,本荟萃分析旨在总结目前有关 RHH 患者 TIPS 治疗效果的数据。方法 从开始到 2023 年 6 月,在 MEDLINE、Embase 和 Scopus 上搜索分析 RHH 患者 TIPS 效果的研究。临床反应、不良事件(AE)、死亡率和分流功能障碍是评估的主要结果。采用随机效应模型计算事件发生率及其 95% 置信区间。结果 最终分析共纳入了 12 项研究(n = 466)。汇总的完全和部分应答率分别为 47.2%(35.8-58.5%)和 25.5%(16.7-34.3%)。RHH患者TIPS后严重AEs和TIPS后肝功能衰竭的汇总发生率分别为5.6%(2.1-9.0%)和7.6%(3.1-12.1%)。RHH患者在TIPS治疗后出现肝性脑病(HE)和对标准治疗无反应的严重HE的总发病率分别为33.2%(20.0-46.4%)和3.6%(0.4-6.8%)。1个月和1年的总死亡率分别为14.0%(8.3-19.6%)和42.0%(33.5-50.4%)。RHH患者TIPS术后分流功能障碍的总发生率为24.2%(16.3-32.2%)。结论 RHH 对肝硬化患者 TIPS 的反应不大,只有一半患者有完全反应。需要进一步研究以确定早期 TIPS 是否能改善肝硬化合并 HHH 患者的预后。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Efficacy of Ultrasound-Guided Injection of Platelet-Rich Plasma in Treatment of Sports-Related Meniscal Injuries Never Regret Trying Image-Guided Sclerotherapy in Orbital Low-Flow Malformation Diagnostic Imaging Performance of Dual-Energy Computed Tomography Compared with Conventional Computed Tomography and Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Uterine Cervical Cancer Spontaneous Chest Wall Hernias: Intercostal Lung Hernia and Inverted Intercostal Hernia WhatsApp and Its Role in Teleradiology
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1