Investigation of Early Maladaptive Schemas and Coping Strategies in Turkish Adults under Probation

IF 2 4区 医学 Q3 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Health & Social Care in the Community Pub Date : 2024-05-17 DOI:10.1155/2024/8953611
Ozlem Gulder Altuner, Gorkem Yararbas
{"title":"Investigation of Early Maladaptive Schemas and Coping Strategies in Turkish Adults under Probation","authors":"Ozlem Gulder Altuner,&nbsp;Gorkem Yararbas","doi":"10.1155/2024/8953611","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n <p><i>Purpose</i>. The aim of the study was to examine the relationships of early maladaptive schemas, overcompensation, and avoidant behaviors with sociodemographic, psychological, legal, and substance use status of individuals under probation due to illicit substance use. <i>Methods</i>. The data of this cross-sectional study were collected from adults under probation through self-report. The dependent variables were early maladaptive schemas, overcompensation, and avoidant behaviors. Sociodemographic, legal, and psychological characteristics and characteristics related to illicit substance use were the independent variables of the study. Student-t test and ANOVA or Mann–Whitney-<i>U</i> and Kruskal–Wallis tests were used in bivariate analyses. Multiple linear regression analysis was used in multivariate analyses. <i>Results</i>. A total of 300 adult individuals under probation participated in the study, and the inclusion rate was 93.5%. The mean age of the study group was 27.96 ± 6.40 years. The amount of smoking (<i>B</i> = 0.65 (95% CI: 0.04–1.27), <i>p</i> = 0.038), frequency of illicit substance use (<i>B</i> = 12.15 (95% CI: 2.04–22.25), <i>p</i> = 0.019), and childhood violence (<i>B</i> = 29.24 (95% CI: 16.92–41.56), <i>p</i> &lt; 0.001) were explanatory for schema scores (<i>R</i><sup>2</sup>: 0.240). Frequency of illicit substance use (<i>B</i> = 7.06 (95% CI: 0.58–13.54), <i>p</i> = 0.033) and childhood violence (<i>B</i> = 9.18 (95% CI: 1.36–17.00), <i>p</i> = 0.022) were explanatory for compensation scores (<i>R</i><sup>2</sup>: 0.083). The amount of smoking (<i>B</i> = 0.49 (95% CI: 0.22–0.76), <i>p</i> = 0.001), frequency of illicit substance use (<i>B</i> = 5.16 (95% CI: 0.67–9.65), <i>p</i> = 0.025), being treated for substance use disorder (<i>B</i> = 6.74 (95% CI: 0.30–13.17), <i>p</i> = 0.040), and experiencing violence in childhood (<i>B</i> = 6.02 (95% CI: 0.59–11.45), <i>p</i> = 0.030) were explanatory for avoidant scores (<i>R</i><sup>2</sup>:0.169). <i>Conclusion</i>. Childhood violence and frequency of illicit substance use were associated with early maladaptive schemas, overcompensation, and avoidance. Smoking appears to be a behavioral way of coping with both early maladaptive schemas and schemas through avoidance.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":48195,"journal":{"name":"Health & Social Care in the Community","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1155/2024/8953611","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health & Social Care in the Community","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1155/2024/8953611","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose. The aim of the study was to examine the relationships of early maladaptive schemas, overcompensation, and avoidant behaviors with sociodemographic, psychological, legal, and substance use status of individuals under probation due to illicit substance use. Methods. The data of this cross-sectional study were collected from adults under probation through self-report. The dependent variables were early maladaptive schemas, overcompensation, and avoidant behaviors. Sociodemographic, legal, and psychological characteristics and characteristics related to illicit substance use were the independent variables of the study. Student-t test and ANOVA or Mann–Whitney-U and Kruskal–Wallis tests were used in bivariate analyses. Multiple linear regression analysis was used in multivariate analyses. Results. A total of 300 adult individuals under probation participated in the study, and the inclusion rate was 93.5%. The mean age of the study group was 27.96 ± 6.40 years. The amount of smoking (B = 0.65 (95% CI: 0.04–1.27), p = 0.038), frequency of illicit substance use (B = 12.15 (95% CI: 2.04–22.25), p = 0.019), and childhood violence (B = 29.24 (95% CI: 16.92–41.56), p < 0.001) were explanatory for schema scores (R2: 0.240). Frequency of illicit substance use (B = 7.06 (95% CI: 0.58–13.54), p = 0.033) and childhood violence (B = 9.18 (95% CI: 1.36–17.00), p = 0.022) were explanatory for compensation scores (R2: 0.083). The amount of smoking (B = 0.49 (95% CI: 0.22–0.76), p = 0.001), frequency of illicit substance use (B = 5.16 (95% CI: 0.67–9.65), p = 0.025), being treated for substance use disorder (B = 6.74 (95% CI: 0.30–13.17), p = 0.040), and experiencing violence in childhood (B = 6.02 (95% CI: 0.59–11.45), p = 0.030) were explanatory for avoidant scores (R2:0.169). Conclusion. Childhood violence and frequency of illicit substance use were associated with early maladaptive schemas, overcompensation, and avoidance. Smoking appears to be a behavioral way of coping with both early maladaptive schemas and schemas through avoidance.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
调查土耳其缓刑期成年人的早期适应不良模式和应对策略
研究目的本研究旨在探讨因使用非法药物而被缓刑的人的早期适应不良模式、过度补偿和回避行为与社会人口学、心理学、法律和药物使用状况之间的关系。研究方法这项横断面研究的数据是通过自我报告的方式从被判缓刑的成年人中收集的。因变量为早期适应不良模式、过度补偿和回避行为。社会人口学、法律和心理特征以及与非法药物使用相关的特征是本研究的自变量。双变量分析采用了Student-t检验和方差分析,或Mann-Whitney-U检验和Kruskal-Wallis检验。多元线性回归分析用于多变量分析。结果。共有 300 名成年缓刑犯参与了研究,纳入率为 93.5%。研究对象的平均年龄为(27.96 ± 6.40)岁。吸烟量(B = 0.65 (95% CI: 0.04-1.27),p=0.038)、非法药物使用频率(B = 12.15 (95% CI: 2.04-22.25),p=0.019)和童年暴力(B = 29.24 (95% CI: 16.92-41.56),p<0.001)对模式得分有解释作用(R2:0.240)。使用非法药物的频率(B=7.06(95% CI:0.58-13.54),p=0.033)和童年暴力(B=9.18(95% CI:1.36-17.00),p=0.022)可解释补偿得分(R2:0.083)。吸烟量(B = 0.49 (95% CI: 0.22-0.76), p=0.001)、使用非法药物的频率(B = 5.16 (95% CI: 0.67-9.65), p=0.025)、接受药物使用障碍治疗(B = 6.74(95% CI:0.30-13.17),p=0.040)和童年遭受暴力(B=6.02(95% CI:0.59-11.45),p=0.030)对回避评分有解释作用(R2:0.169)。结论童年暴力和非法药物使用频率与早期适应不良模式、过度补偿和回避有关。吸烟似乎是一种通过回避来应对早期适应不良图式和图式的行为方式。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
8.30%
发文量
423
期刊介绍: Health and Social Care in the community is an essential journal for anyone involved in nursing, social work, physiotherapy, occupational therapy, general practice, health psychology, health economy, primary health care and the promotion of health. It is an international peer-reviewed journal supporting interdisciplinary collaboration on policy and practice within health and social care in the community. The journal publishes: - Original research papers in all areas of health and social care - Topical health and social care review articles - Policy and practice evaluations - Book reviews - Special issues
期刊最新文献
The Place of Intuition in the Clinical Reasoning of Occupational Therapists: A Multiple-Case Study Service User Perspectives of Family Involvement and Mental Health Care Outcomes in Queensland Predictors of Discharge from Hospital to Supported Accommodation and Support Needs Once in Supported Accommodation for People with Serious Mental Illness in Scotland: A Linked National Dataset Study Assessing Social Networks: Validation of the Informal Supporter Readiness Inventory (ISRI) for Use in an Australian Context Urban-Rural Disparity and Economic Geography Variation in the Likelihood of Meeting Physical Activity Recommendation–Results from the Study of Community Sports in China
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1