Axillary Management Following Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Clinically Node-Positive Breast Cancer

IF 2.9 3区 医学 Q2 ONCOLOGY Clinical breast cancer Pub Date : 2024-08-01 DOI:10.1016/j.clbc.2024.05.008
{"title":"Axillary Management Following Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Clinically Node-Positive Breast Cancer","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.clbc.2024.05.008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>Clinical trial data indicate that omitting axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) is feasible and may reduce morbidity for carefully selected patients with clinically node-positive breast cancer who achieve a pathological complete response (pCR) after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NCT). However, there remains a need to understand how these findings translate to broader clinical practice and to identify which patients benefit most. This study utilizes a national dataset to assess outcomes in axillary management, aiming to inform best practice in axillary de-escalation.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>The National Cancer Data Base was used to identify women diagnosed with clinically node-positive invasive breast cancer between 2012 to 2020 who received NCT and subsequent ALND. Associations between clinicopathologic factors and axillary pCR were analyzed statistically.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Of the 59,791 patients included, 8,827 (14.76%) achieved nodal pCR. Patients with HR-negative and HER2-positive receptor status more frequently underwent ALND instead of sentinel lymph node biopsy. Conversely, patients over the age of 70, those with private or public insurance, and cases classified as ypT1 or ypT2 were less likely to undergo ALND.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>A subset of patients with clinically node-positive breast cancer received ALND despite achieving axillary pCR following NCT. This highlights an opportunity to enhance precision in identifying candidates for axillary de-escalation, potentially reducing morbidity and tailoring treatment more closely to individual patient needs.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":10197,"journal":{"name":"Clinical breast cancer","volume":"24 6","pages":"Pages 527-532"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical breast cancer","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1526820924001216","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

Clinical trial data indicate that omitting axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) is feasible and may reduce morbidity for carefully selected patients with clinically node-positive breast cancer who achieve a pathological complete response (pCR) after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NCT). However, there remains a need to understand how these findings translate to broader clinical practice and to identify which patients benefit most. This study utilizes a national dataset to assess outcomes in axillary management, aiming to inform best practice in axillary de-escalation.

Methods

The National Cancer Data Base was used to identify women diagnosed with clinically node-positive invasive breast cancer between 2012 to 2020 who received NCT and subsequent ALND. Associations between clinicopathologic factors and axillary pCR were analyzed statistically.

Results

Of the 59,791 patients included, 8,827 (14.76%) achieved nodal pCR. Patients with HR-negative and HER2-positive receptor status more frequently underwent ALND instead of sentinel lymph node biopsy. Conversely, patients over the age of 70, those with private or public insurance, and cases classified as ypT1 or ypT2 were less likely to undergo ALND.

Conclusion

A subset of patients with clinically node-positive breast cancer received ALND despite achieving axillary pCR following NCT. This highlights an opportunity to enhance precision in identifying candidates for axillary de-escalation, potentially reducing morbidity and tailoring treatment more closely to individual patient needs.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
临床结节阳性乳腺癌新辅助化疗后的腋窝管理
导言:临床试验数据表明,对于经过新辅助化疗(NCT)后获得病理完全反应(pCR)的临床结节阳性乳腺癌患者来说,省略腋窝淋巴结清扫(ALND)是可行的,而且可以降低发病率。然而,我们仍需了解这些发现如何转化为更广泛的临床实践,并确定哪些患者受益最大。本研究利用一个全国性数据集来评估腋窝管理的结果,旨在为腋窝去势的最佳实践提供信息。方法利用全国癌症数据库来识别2012年至2020年间被诊断为临床结节阳性浸润性乳腺癌并接受NCT和随后ALND治疗的女性患者。结果在纳入的59791名患者中,有8827人(14.76%)获得了结节pCR。HR阴性和HER2受体阳性的患者更常接受ALND而非前哨淋巴结活检。与此相反,70 岁以上、有私人或公共保险的患者以及被归类为 ypT1 或 ypT2 的病例不太可能接受 ALND。这凸显了提高腋窝去势候选者识别精确度的机会,有可能降低发病率,并使治疗更符合患者的个体需求。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Clinical breast cancer
Clinical breast cancer 医学-肿瘤学
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
3.20%
发文量
174
审稿时长
48 days
期刊介绍: Clinical Breast Cancer is a peer-reviewed bimonthly journal that publishes original articles describing various aspects of clinical and translational research of breast cancer. Clinical Breast Cancer is devoted to articles on detection, diagnosis, prevention, and treatment of breast cancer. The main emphasis is on recent scientific developments in all areas related to breast cancer. Specific areas of interest include clinical research reports from various therapeutic modalities, cancer genetics, drug sensitivity and resistance, novel imaging, tumor genomics, biomarkers, and chemoprevention strategies.
期刊最新文献
Editorial Board Table of Contents Clinical and Imaging Features Associated With Malignant Focal Nonmass Enhancement on Breast MRI. Real-World Outcomes of Pyrotinib-Based Therapy for HER2-Positive Breast Cancer With Brain Metastases: A Multicentre, Retrospective Analysis. Another Biosignature for Ductal Carcinoma In Situ-Have We Moved the Needle?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1