Outcomes of direct oral anticoagulants with aspirin vs warfarin with aspirin: a registry-based cohort study

IF 3.4 3区 医学 Q2 HEMATOLOGY Research and Practice in Thrombosis and Haemostasis Pub Date : 2024-05-01 DOI:10.1016/j.rpth.2024.102449
Jordan K. Schaefer , Josh Errickson , Xiaowen Kong , Mona A. Ali , Deborah DeCamillo , Subhash Edupuganti , Brian Haymart , Scott Kaatz , Eva Kline-Rogers , Jay H. Kozlowski , Gregory D. Krol , Suman L. Sood , James B. Froehlich , Geoffrey D. Barnes
{"title":"Outcomes of direct oral anticoagulants with aspirin vs warfarin with aspirin: a registry-based cohort study","authors":"Jordan K. Schaefer ,&nbsp;Josh Errickson ,&nbsp;Xiaowen Kong ,&nbsp;Mona A. Ali ,&nbsp;Deborah DeCamillo ,&nbsp;Subhash Edupuganti ,&nbsp;Brian Haymart ,&nbsp;Scott Kaatz ,&nbsp;Eva Kline-Rogers ,&nbsp;Jay H. Kozlowski ,&nbsp;Gregory D. Krol ,&nbsp;Suman L. Sood ,&nbsp;James B. Froehlich ,&nbsp;Geoffrey D. Barnes","doi":"10.1016/j.rpth.2024.102449","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>For patients anticoagulated with direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) or warfarin and on aspirin (ASA) for nonvalvular atrial fibrillation and/or venous thromboembolism, it is unclear if bleeding outcomes differ.</p></div><div><h3>Objectives</h3><p>To assess bleeding rates for ASA with DOACs vs warfarin and one another.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Registry-based cohort study of patients followed by a 6-center quality improvement collaborative in Michigan using data from 2009 to 2022. The study included adults on ASA with warfarin or DOACs for atrial fibrillation and/or venous thromboembolism without a recent myocardial infarction or heart valve replacement.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>After propensity matching by anticoagulant class, we compared 2 groups of 1467 patients followed for a median of 18.0 months. Any bleeding and nonmajor bleeding was increased with DOACs + ASA compared with warfarin + ASA (32.2 vs 27.8 and 27.1 vs 22.9 events/100 patient-years; relative risks [RRs], 1.1 and 1.2; 95% CIs, 1.1-1.2 and 1.1-1.3, respectively). After matching by drug, patients on apixaban + ASA vs warfarin + ASA had more bleeding (31.2 vs 27.8 events/100 patient-years; RR, 1.1; 95% CI, 1.0-1.2) and nonmajor bleeding but less major bleeding (3.8 vs 4.7 events/100 patient-years; RR, 0.8; 95% CI, 0.6-1.0) and emergency room visits for bleeding. Patients on rivaroxaban + ASA vs warfarin + ASA had more bleeding (39.3 vs 26.3 events/100 patient-years, RR, 1.5; 95% CI, 1.3-1.6), nonmajor bleeding, and thrombosis. Patients on apixaban + ASA vs rivaroxaban + ASA had significantly less bleeding (22.5 vs 39.3/100 patient-years; RR, 0.6; 95% CI, 0.5-0.7), nonmajor bleeding, major bleeding (2.1 vs 5.5 events/100 patient-years; RR, 0.4; 95% CI, 0.2-0.6), emergency room visits for bleeding, and thrombotic events.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Patients on DOAC + ASA without a recent myocardial infarction or heart valve replacement had more nonmajor bleeding but otherwise similar outcomes compared with warfarin + ASA. Patients treated with rivaroxaban + ASA experienced more adverse clinical events compared with warfarin + ASA or apixaban + ASA.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":20893,"journal":{"name":"Research and Practice in Thrombosis and Haemostasis","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2475037924001389/pdfft?md5=4083a45feeb15328e9c0b6ccd63e6c6f&pid=1-s2.0-S2475037924001389-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Research and Practice in Thrombosis and Haemostasis","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2475037924001389","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

For patients anticoagulated with direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) or warfarin and on aspirin (ASA) for nonvalvular atrial fibrillation and/or venous thromboembolism, it is unclear if bleeding outcomes differ.

Objectives

To assess bleeding rates for ASA with DOACs vs warfarin and one another.

Methods

Registry-based cohort study of patients followed by a 6-center quality improvement collaborative in Michigan using data from 2009 to 2022. The study included adults on ASA with warfarin or DOACs for atrial fibrillation and/or venous thromboembolism without a recent myocardial infarction or heart valve replacement.

Results

After propensity matching by anticoagulant class, we compared 2 groups of 1467 patients followed for a median of 18.0 months. Any bleeding and nonmajor bleeding was increased with DOACs + ASA compared with warfarin + ASA (32.2 vs 27.8 and 27.1 vs 22.9 events/100 patient-years; relative risks [RRs], 1.1 and 1.2; 95% CIs, 1.1-1.2 and 1.1-1.3, respectively). After matching by drug, patients on apixaban + ASA vs warfarin + ASA had more bleeding (31.2 vs 27.8 events/100 patient-years; RR, 1.1; 95% CI, 1.0-1.2) and nonmajor bleeding but less major bleeding (3.8 vs 4.7 events/100 patient-years; RR, 0.8; 95% CI, 0.6-1.0) and emergency room visits for bleeding. Patients on rivaroxaban + ASA vs warfarin + ASA had more bleeding (39.3 vs 26.3 events/100 patient-years, RR, 1.5; 95% CI, 1.3-1.6), nonmajor bleeding, and thrombosis. Patients on apixaban + ASA vs rivaroxaban + ASA had significantly less bleeding (22.5 vs 39.3/100 patient-years; RR, 0.6; 95% CI, 0.5-0.7), nonmajor bleeding, major bleeding (2.1 vs 5.5 events/100 patient-years; RR, 0.4; 95% CI, 0.2-0.6), emergency room visits for bleeding, and thrombotic events.

Conclusion

Patients on DOAC + ASA without a recent myocardial infarction or heart valve replacement had more nonmajor bleeding but otherwise similar outcomes compared with warfarin + ASA. Patients treated with rivaroxaban + ASA experienced more adverse clinical events compared with warfarin + ASA or apixaban + ASA.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
直接口服抗凝药联合阿司匹林与华法林联合阿司匹林的疗效对比:基于登记的队列研究
背景对于因非瓣膜性心房颤动和/或静脉血栓栓塞症而使用直接口服抗凝剂 (DOAC) 或华法林抗凝并服用阿司匹林 (ASA) 的患者,目前尚不清楚出血结果是否存在差异。方法利用 2009 年至 2022 年的数据,对密歇根州 6 个中心质量改进协作组随访的患者进行基于登记簿的队列研究。研究对象包括因心房颤动和/或静脉血栓栓塞症而服用 ASA 与华法林或 DOACs 的成人,且近期未发生心肌梗死或心脏瓣膜置换术。结果经过抗凝剂类别倾向匹配后,我们对两组 1467 例患者进行了比较,随访时间中位数为 18.0 个月。与华法林 + ASA 相比,DOAC + ASA 会增加任何出血和非大出血的发生率(32.2 vs 27.8 和 27.1 vs 22.9 次/100 患者年;相对风险 [RRs],1.1 和 1.2;95% CIs,分别为 1.1-1.2 和 1.1-1.3)。按药物进行匹配后,阿哌沙班+ASA与华法林+ASA患者的出血量(31.2 vs 27.8次/100患者年;RR,1.1;95% CI,1.0-1.2)和非大出血次数较多,但大出血(3.8 vs 4.7次/100患者年;RR,0.8;95% CI,0.6-1.0)和因出血而去急诊就诊的次数较少。利伐沙班+ASA与华法林+ASA相比,患者的出血量(39.3 vs 26.3次/100患者年,RR,1.5;95% CI,1.3-1.6)、非大出血和血栓形成的发生率更高。阿哌沙班+ASA与利伐沙班+ASA相比,患者的出血量(22.5 vs 39.3/100患者-年;RR,0.6;95% CI,0.5-0.7)、非大出血、大出血(2.1 vs 5.5次/100患者-年;RR,0.4;95% CI,0.2-0.6)、因出血导致的急诊就诊次数(2.1 vs 5.5次/100患者-年;RR,0.4;95% CI,0.2-0.6)均显著减少。结论与华法林+ASA相比,使用DOAC+ASA且近期未发生心肌梗死或心脏瓣膜置换术的患者非大出血较多,但其他结果相似。与华法林+ASA或阿哌沙班+ASA相比,接受利伐沙班+ASA治疗的患者发生的不良临床事件更多。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
13.00%
发文量
212
审稿时长
7 weeks
期刊最新文献
The risk of venous thromboembolism in primary central nervous system lymphoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis Is lupus anticoagulant testing with dilute Russell’s viper venom clotting times reliable in the presence of inflammation? Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of low doses of recombinant tissue plasminogen activator to establish a model for biosimilarity comparisons Physician practice patterns on the use of inferior vena cava filters in venous thromboembolism Erratum to ‘Performance of Risk Scores in Predicting Major Bleeding in Left Ventricular Assist Device (LVAD) Recipients: a Comparative External Validation. ’[Res Pract Thromb Haemost. 2024;8:e102437]
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1